• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

Progression bets are nothing more than different size bets on different spins. You could get lucky and win big, or unlucky and lose even more.

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

Dyksexlic

Started by Blueprint, Sep 28, 07:11 PM 2018

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Blueprint

Can we stay on topic or lock this thread?   We get it, Steve.  Your way is the only way and you're blind to everything else that's been shared on your forum.   Moving on.

Blueprint

Here's what Dyskexlic had to say about all that nonsense.

It's NOT concerned with "the house edge". Who CARES ?

It's NOT recording the patterns of red / black / high /low / odd / even etc.

It's NOT doubling up if you win / lose etc.

It's NOT waiting for "HOT" numbers or any other 'essential' event.

It's NOT restricted to casinos using Playtech software

It's NOT based on pseudo-random number sequences for success

It's NOT to do with calculating wheel bias. (Give me a $%#@ing break!)

It's NOT about calculating the velocity / wind direction / density of the ball / varnish on the wood etc.

It's NOT BS, or a figment of my imagination.


Steve

Quote from: Blueprint on Oct 03, 09:27 AM 2018
Can we stay on topic or lock this thread?   We get it, Steve.  Your way is the only way and you're blind to everything else that's been shared on your forum.   Moving on.

Did you even just read what i said? Wake up.
"The only way to beat roulette is by increasing the accuracy of predictions"
Roulettephysics.com ← Professional roulette tips
Roulette-computers.com ← Hidden electronics that predicts the winning number
Roulettephysics.com/roulette-strategy ← Why most systems lose

Steve

Btw, Dyksexlic was just a troll who used other usernames. His intention was clearly to string people along for self gratification. He caught many,  hook, line and sinker.

Unfortunately many people didnt see it. And his manipulation has had lasting effects, because many people have such bad understanding.

Anyway, continue on.  It has all been said before. Happy winnings.  :twisted:
"The only way to beat roulette is by increasing the accuracy of predictions"
Roulettephysics.com ← Professional roulette tips
Roulette-computers.com ← Hidden electronics that predicts the winning number
Roulettephysics.com/roulette-strategy ← Why most systems lose

Madi

Quote from: PassionRuleta on Oct 03, 04:16 PM 2018
[quote author = Steve link = topic = 20821.msg210520 # msg210520 date = 1538597294]
Btw, Dyksexlic was just a troll who used other usernames. His intention was clearly to string people along for self gratification. I have caught many, hook, line and sinker.

Unfortunately many people did not see it. And his manipulation has had lasting effects, because many people have such bad understanding.

Anyway, continue on. It has been said before. Happy winnings : twisted:
[/ quote]

I do not know if for you or for others dyksexlic was a troll or a sell fumes, what if I can tell you that I have deciphered it and it is super easy to apply and comes out once 100% sure always.
It is the only way I can say and confirm that what the author says is totally true, it always happens and that is to win with security.
I have also studied visual balisitica and I know good prediction forms, but it does not work on all roulettes, and that means it is not 100% reliable, whether you like it or not.
But if I can assure you that what dyksexlic says is an irremediable mathematical principle for the game, it will have to do one thing if or if, it can not avoid it, even though it is manipulated.

I would give you a great track, but as you will not believe in it and many despise me in this forum, I will never give any clue because here in this forum everything is smarter and more good than the rest ... :xd: :xd: :lol: :thumbsup:


Omg 😮. Its the number 3 HG . How much??

Blueprint

Quote from: Steve on Oct 03, 04:02 PM 2018Did you even just read what i said? Wake up.

Didn't.  And won't.

Blueprint

Quote from: Steve on Oct 03, 04:08 PM 2018Btw, Dyksexlic was just a troll who used other usernames. His intention was clearly to string people along for self gratification. He caught many,  hook, line and sinker.

You're wrong.  If there was no Dyksexlic then there would be no reddwarf/rrbb and Priyanka.   Think about that.   

You're out of your league, my friend.  Way out of your league.  Stick to your cheating methods and we will continue to beat the game in front of your eyes.


The General

Quote from: Blueprint on Oct 03, 04:47 PM 2018
You're wrong.  If there was no Dyksexlic then there would be no reddwarf/rrbb and Priyanka.   Think about that.   

You're out of your league, my friend.  Way out of your league.  Stick to your cheating methods and we will continue to beat the game in front of your eyes.

You should prove us wrong.  Go to the casino and increase your bet!  ::)
Basic probability and The General are your friend.
(Now hiring minions, apply within.)

Steve

Quote from: PassionRuleta on Oct 03, 04:16 PM 2018super easy to apply and comes out once 100% sure always. It is the only way I can say and confirm that what the author says is totally true, it always happens and that is to win with security.

So why are you still looking for methods to win?

Quote from: PassionRuleta on Oct 03, 04:16 PM 2018I have also studied visual balisitica and I know good prediction forms, but it does not work on all roulettes, and that means it is not 100% reliable, whether you like it or not.

Correct, its not magic. But it beats enough wheels, and with a high enough edge, to be easily viable.

Frankly, bullshit Dyksexlic's systems work 100% of the time. There's a lot of talk here, but the talkers cant even beat MPR.

Quote from: PassionRuleta on Oct 03, 04:16 PM 2018But if I can assure you that what dyksexlic says is an irremediable mathematical principle for the game, it will have to do one thing if or if, it can not avoid it, even though it is manipulated.

What principle? I recall he only published incorrect gibberish.

Again if it's guaranteed, why are you still looking for winning systems? Why arent you winning fortunes?

Quote from: PassionRuleta on Oct 03, 04:16 PM 2018many despise me in this forum

Its probably something to do with what you were selling, and claiming it also never lost. You may need to redefine what you call "never lose".

Quote from: Blueprint on Oct 03, 04:44 PM 2018Didn't.  And won't.

That's probably why you learn slowly.

I think a major problem here is some members are quite immature. Specifically, even when they are clearly wrong, they don't like to be told that. They take offense to it. Even in the face of obvious truth, being "right" is more important than actual truth.

Personally if someone tells me I'm wrong, I'm not offended. I simply ask them to "show me". If they can't, then there's no reason to change what I consider fact. If they show me proof, I'll gladly change my belief, without stomping my feet.

One could argue I've been shown proof. Yes, things like 2 comes after 1, 3 comes after 2. I remember. And charts showing 22 or so spins. I've also been lectured lots by members who even have MPR win rates lower than random.

Quote from: Blueprint on Oct 03, 04:47 PM 2018If there was no Dyksexlic then there would be no reddwarf/rrbb and Priyanka.   Think about that.   

Reddwarf spoke much the same nonsense as Dyksexlic. Maybe even the same person. I remember checking IPs and Dyksexlic was a serial troll who had done the same thing before, much like CEH. As for Priyanka, nobody followed him until he got great results on MPR. And when it was revealed he exploited a loophole in the game to cheat, many followers continued to follow the nonsense. He even clearly eventually said his approaches are not the holy grail, and eventually lose. Good of him to come clean at least. Still ignored.

Quote from: The General on Oct 03, 05:27 PM 2018You should prove us wrong.  Go to the casino and increase your bet! 

Not likely when none of them can even beat a simulation.. unless you're looking only at 22 spins.

Quote from: Blueprint on Oct 03, 04:47 PM 2018You're out of your league, my friend.  Way out of your league.  Stick to your cheating methods and we will continue to beat the game in front of your eyes.

You're a bit lost. I sincerely hope it doesnt take you much longer to figure it out.
"The only way to beat roulette is by increasing the accuracy of predictions"
Roulettephysics.com ← Professional roulette tips
Roulette-computers.com ← Hidden electronics that predicts the winning number
Roulettephysics.com/roulette-strategy ← Why most systems lose

Madi

Quote from: PassionRuleta on Oct 03, 06:36 PM 2018
[quote author = Blueprint link = topic = 20821.msg210524 # msg210524 date = 1538599624]
You're wrong. If there was no Dyksexlic then there would be no reddwarf / rrbb and Priyanka. Think about that.

You're out of your league, my friend. Way out of your league. Stick to your cheating methods and we will continue to beat the game in front of your eyes.
[/ quote]

Do not worry about Blueprint, they are very wrong, dyksexlic is the true expert, he knows what he is talking about, it is better than all the ones I have seen and studied, even better than Turbo and Vaddis, it is so simple that you can not imagine it.

:thumbsup:

O my god.
Vaddi is better than turbo
Dysexlic is better than vaddi

Whats next

Passion is wasier than all

Madi

I think ,next passion is targetting blueprint to suck up some more info.

Dont be surprised if there is call for skype invitation.

Dont be fool

Blueprint

Ok, Steve.  Whatever you say.  I’m not the one that has been to court for my delusions. 

The immature people are the ones who feel they need to drop in on every post with the same nonsense touting there own agenda.

Steve

Quote from: Blueprint on Oct 03, 07:51 PM 2018Ok, Steve.  Whatever you say.

Great logic, solid proof. As always.

Quote from: Blueprint on Oct 03, 07:51 PM 2018I’m not the one that has been to court for my delusions. 

Seems like a blind stab with no idea. People tend to get personal when their arguments dont hold water.

Quote from: Blueprint on Oct 03, 07:51 PM 2018The immature people are the ones who feel they need to drop in on every post with the same nonsense touting there own agenda.

The agenda is truth. Really simple. I'm sorry, I dont believe in fairies unless someone shows me evidence they exists. And I don't believe you can consistently win in roulette unless you improve your odds of winning to overcome the unfair payout. In layman's terms, I don't believe 35 is greater than 37.
"The only way to beat roulette is by increasing the accuracy of predictions"
Roulettephysics.com ← Professional roulette tips
Roulette-computers.com ← Hidden electronics that predicts the winning number
Roulettephysics.com/roulette-strategy ← Why most systems lose

Steve

Passion, unfortunately you and others have no idea and cant even grasp the basics. It's unfortunate, but it's not like it isnt all right in front of you. Anyway good luck, if you're winning, keep doing it.
"The only way to beat roulette is by increasing the accuracy of predictions"
Roulettephysics.com ← Professional roulette tips
Roulette-computers.com ← Hidden electronics that predicts the winning number
Roulettephysics.com/roulette-strategy ← Why most systems lose

Blueprint

Keep baiting... like your 1995 pop up to get more suckers. 

I won’t be sharing or proving anything.  You wouldn’t understand and I sure as hell won’t devalue it by sharing with you.


-