Dyksexlic

[The General]

This is exactly the kind of application which algorithms like dijkstra can help to optimize.

Money management  can't turn a losing game into a winning won in the long run.

[Joe]

I didn't say it could, did I? 

[The General]

Joe, if you had wanted I would have given you very good information to create a winning program, but you did not want to.
Now another person already created the simple program as dyksexlic, but there is another one working hard on the dijkstra algorithm to do something much better and soon I will have it.
I will show that you can win by playing only 1-3 numbers with the dijkstra algorithm program in a live casino.
Although what makes dyksexlic really wins in any casino.

A scam.

[6th-sense]

Money management  can't turn a losing game into a winning won in the long run.

Is that just the game of roulette your referring too itself ?

Or just Systems

[Joe]

Joe, if you had wanted I would have given you very good information to create a winning program, but you did not want to.

Not quite true. I only work for nothing on projects which interest me, otherwise I charge (and not very much either). You weren't even interested in hearing how much I was going to charge; as soon as I mentioned payment that was enough. ;-)
Apparently you thought that the information was payment enough. Get real. If you knew your system was a winner why would you need to have it coded?
So supposing I code it and show that it works, in that case my time has been well spent and you are happy; I don't care that I wasn't paid because now I've got a winning system which is much more valuable than the small amount I would have charged for coding. But the overwhelming likelihood would be that it doesn't work, in which case you learned something. But what did I get out of it if I wasn't paid? I put the time and effort into coding but all I got was a chart going south, just another system which didn't work. I took all the risk, you took none. That's not my idea of good business.
Gamblers, they always want something for nothing. 

So here's the deal for anyone who wants a system coded : if it works I won't charge, if it doesn't I want to be paid for my work. Fair enough?

[The General]

There's no secret formula for beating the random game of roulette.

[Steve]

The scam is you and your gang that you still think you are in the 90s to win with ballistics ...

Another guy talking about something he has no experience with.

Passion if you want to code something, try a freelance programmer site. If you had a system that worked, surely you could afford that, right?

[Steve]

That I can pay for it, does not mean that I have to look for someone to pay for it, I can look for someone without paying and who benefits from it.

If you have the HG, why waste time struggling to find a free coder when you can get it done quickly by paying a programmer?

It might cost you around $500, which is nothing if you have the HG.

[luckyfella]

You know it's a funny thing; the harder I work the luckier I get. ;-)

Thomas Edison found the ways that don't work 1st
That's down to sheer hard work
He is destined to live his life
Imo

Some may not agree

[luckyfella]

This is exactly the kind of application which algorithms like dijkstra can help to optimize.

Betselection and MM

Horse before the cart
Cart before the horse

What role can each play ?
Is it dysfunctional if it's inverted ?

The high road leads to well known destination

[Gandhi]

PassionRuletta, how many numbers does Diksexlic play?  1 - 3 ?

[Herby]

By the way, I already have the dijkstra algorithm program.

It's a 1 minute search (if you are slow) in the internet.

You are able to find out stable patterns in dynamic sequences (be careful the Britts will kill you like Alan Turing).
You found this patterns 9 months ago.
But you are not able to learn a programming language within this 9 months. Any more questions ? 

[Joe]

On the other hand I think it's good that you think it's not going to work, it's your decision, but that was not the case, because if it works and only with having told you the theory, you would have understood that it is impossible to lose.

Here's what doesn't make sense : if it's impossible to lose, why do you need to have it coded? My point is that you don't know whether it wins or not long term, and you're relying on a naive programmer to find out for you. If it loses, you haven't lost anything, but the programmer has wasted time and effort. Some may be happy to do it for nothing, not me.
So anyway, looking forward to seeing you blow the MPR out of the water, then I'll kick myself. 

[Steve]

5 players with the hg can't combine funds to pay a programmer to test a system they know works but want to get a free programmer to see if it works.

It makes sense.

[Let Me Win]

Anyone can have any system made for Roulette Extreme which can also play as a bot for just $50 US Dollars.

link:://:.uxsoftware.com/pages/custom.html

So there you have it, just $10 each you cheapskates.