Dyksexlic

[Tinsoldiers]

So anyway, looking forward to seeing you blow the MPR out of the water, then I'll kick myself.

Seriously I don’t understand this argument while I agree to everything else you say as you talk sense. Why would anyone spend their time and energy on proving something that works.  What’s in it for them . If he’s a scammer, it will fail. If ones a winner what’s in it for him to prove it works.  Out of my league.

[luckyfella]

Seriously I don’t understand this argument while I agree to everything else you say as you talk sense. Why would anyone spend their time and energy on proving something that works.  What’s in it for them . If he’s a scammer, it will fail. If ones a winner what’s in it for him to prove it works.  Out of my league.

And risk the system get stolen

[Tinsoldiers]

And risk the system get stolen

There is no system that wins, so that’s the least of any ones worries.

[Joe]

Seriously I don’t understand this argument while I agree to everything else you say as you talk sense. Why would anyone spend their time and energy on proving something that works.  What’s in it for them

Good question, what's in it for them? But you could also ask why certain members feel the need to boast about their supposedly infallible systems. Is it mere attention seeking? or perhaps they feel that they're doing us mere mortals a favor by giving us hope to carry on the search. If that's the case, why not actually demonstrate that their systems work instead of offering mere words?
Turbo claimed he never lost and put a lot of effort into his posts, but getting to the top of the mpr leaderboard would have been much more eloquent, yet somehow he was never able to do it.

There is no system that wins, so that’s the least of any ones worries.

I agree. 

[The General]

Good question, what's in it for them? But you could also ask why certain members feel the need to boast about their supposedly infallible systems. Is it mere attention seeking? or perhaps they feel that they're doing us mere mortals a favor by giving us hope to carry on the search. If that's the case, why not actually demonstrate that their systems work instead of offering mere words?
Turbo claimed he never lost and put a lot of effort into his posts, but getting to the top of the mpr leaderboard would have been much more eloquent, yet somehow he was never able to do it.

Because his system didn't work any better than just random guessing.

[Joe]

If you're talking about his bet selection, yes I agree.

[Steve]

Come to the dark side..

[luckyfella]

There is no system that wins, so that’s the least of any ones worries.

(Fill in your name) believe no system wins [itlr]

No surprise there

[luckyfella]

Good question, what's in it for them? But you could also ask why certain members feel the need to boast about their supposedly infallible systems. Is it mere attention seeking? or perhaps they feel that they're doing us mere mortals a favor by giving us hope to carry on the search. If that's the case, why not actually demonstrate that their systems work instead of offering mere words?
Turbo claimed he never lost and put a lot of effort into his posts, but getting to the top of the mpr leaderboard would have been much more eloquent, yet somehow he was never able to do it.

I agree. 

Yup, Mpr is the gold standard

[Gandhi]

[quote author = Gandhi link = topic = 20821.msg210625 # msg210625 date = 1538713173]
PassionRuletta, how many numbers does Diksexlic play? 1 - 3?
[/ quote]

No, the form of dyksexlic plays on the fly to several and sometimes to many.

The other form that plays between 1-3 numbers is something more advanced that we have created on the dijkstra algorithm, it is something of our own.

Ok what is the maximum numbers that Diksexlic plays?

[Joe]

I repeat, why should I bother to try to win in a simulator?

Because actions speak louder than words?

A simulator is nothing like a roulette game, nor a dealer, I assure you, but do the tests.

Now you're just contradicting yourself. dyksexlic claims he wins whether RNG or real spins, what's RNG if not a simulator?

I don't get it. All these people (Turbo, dyksexic, reddwarf etc etc) are made out to be heroes and gurus based on what exactly? Nothing apart from talk, hints, bluster and self-promotion, there isn't a shred of real evidence that they have holy grails.
Now I enjoy tinkering with and playing systems, and it does get annoying sometimes hearing the constant refrain of "it won't work" or "it's a fallacy", but although I have done pretty well playing roulette with systems, I don't claim that there is or can be such a thing as an infallible one. I'm not saying that there aren't good and bad systems, but eventually they all tank and anyone who believes that they can just mindlessly play the same system forever and keep winning is deluding themselves.

[Kattila]

Quote:
**I don't get it. All these people (Turbo, dyksexic, reddwarf etc etc) are made out to be heroes and gurus based on what exactly? Nothing apart from talk, hints, bluster and self-promotion, there isn't a shred of real evidence that they have holy grails. **

Very well said     

[Steve]

Yes it's good to see some reason, instead of blindly and naively believing unsubstantiated claims.

There have been many others, but dyksexic was just another troll posting nonsense, and some people were stupid enough to believe him. Sorry its just the truth.

[nottophammer]

I'm not saying that there aren't good and bad systems, but eventually they all tank and anyone who believes that they can just mindlessly play the same system forever and keep winning is deluding themselves.

Exactly Joe.
Joe why do you think i collect all spins and then place how the non-hit come.
I have data for airball, the General's starburst numbers, you're UK i believe, i have FOBT's and last but not lease, the recommended Random.org, by the great General and even Tuner.

Joe they are all  the same data.

I posted 34 spins from corals and won 81 units, by just watching how the non-hits come.

As Winkel says watch the TROT of if you like 1/37 spins, those starting 37 non-hit have an average

[nottophammer]

Joe
The question where to post, so here hope not cluttering this thread.
Above said best to just watch.
This on the gold standard MPR, Steve could if he wantd get the programmer to find these spins, but guess he won't, don't suit his agenda.

It started bets for non-hit, then repeats with R1's to go to R2 and again R2's to go to R3
+546

Here is the laminated sheet, probably a bit messy, so here is the countback sheet as well

See the 9. 7. 12 going perfect for the averages.





Taotie or Bombus or what ever AKA you use, where you on as Monkey has landed sounds about right for an idiot like you.