Unicorns Aren't Real

[-Katalyst-]

....& 'holy grain' can be harvested in a multitude of ways! ........with the right seeds! 

[The General]

The thread seems to upset some people, but it shouldn't have. 

Walking into the casino there was an add that would come up about once every minute or so on various TV monitors in the casino.  The add, actually an informative note read, "It's true...that unicorns aren't real, but the house advantage is."


How many of you would have been bent out of shape reading that in the casino? 
It seems that the casino isn't always a safe place from the facts either.

[Steve]

thing I don't understand is why is it so hard for some on here to digest that system players can and are making profits

The thing you're not getting is we've all made profits with a bad system too. Almost every system wins for a while, then tanks. That's not what we're talking about.

[luckyfella]

Almost every system wins for a while, then tanks.

Why do you qualify your statement?

And that's your opinion

[-Katalyst-]

 - not getting what you’ll are spraying on here? - sure! 

....and I'm not talking about winning for a while - *as noted - you are entitled to your opinion though 


@ Caleb - you implying that you are in shape?
  Pls! 

[Steve]

Why do you qualify your statement?

Because not every system has no effect on prediction accuracy

and I'm not talking about winning for a while - *as noted - you are entitled to your opinion though 

Show me one long-term chart with realistic conditions.

Understand my opinion is based on knowledge of the system and its principles, the fact that the talkers here tank on mpr, and all the short term charts they're posting to supposedly prove their system works.

My opinions are actually just facts. Show me otherwise.

[Roulettebeater]

Steve, general :

RX? Do you think is needed ?
Maybe, but the issue is that I don’t have the predictions at hand!
I get the predictions from a computer program.
The program requires data, actually I am inputting the data manually.

By the way, if you check the outcome, you will see that the edge achieved is approx 7% against the house!

I tested in the past many „flatearthers“ systems ! All failed after 100 spins, as you know the variance gets aggressiver with the time.

I don’t always believe in bullshit but sometimes you should take the shit out of the bull and make from bull‘s steaks delicious barbecue.

[Steve]

Rx just makes it easier to test enough spins. It would take too long to test enough spins manually. Think in terms of hundreds of thousands of spins.

[Roulettebeater]

Steve

I can make a deal with you, if you want !
Do you know how the prototype of an electronic device that can be used on land based casino should look like ?

I am planing to start developing a device that can do the work for me, the device should be small, smart and undetectable!

It should take some data in input and provide result.

Device won’t work as a traditional computer that needs to be hang over the wheel !

The player needs to input data manually and be able to read the result from a small display !

Do you have any idea ? Or experience ?

The algorithm should be handled secretly!

[Steve]

Coding an app with key input and analysis is easy.

Device won’t work as a traditional computer that needs to be hang over the wheel !

You've got the wrong idea about roulette computers. They don't hang over the wheel. Players with my hybrid could even be strip searched and all there'd be is a normal phone.

Do you have any idea ? Or experience ?

Piss easy.

But you can't be vague with programmers. You need precise algorithms that can code.

[-Katalyst-]

@ Steve -  - your opinion is 'based on knowledge of the system and it's principles' ....who's system and who's principles?! - your view and take on it? - competent at VB/AP you guys maybe - but system play?

**to an extent - I see your logic/angle ......at the same I am voicing for certain posters past and present that have graciously shared info and have been ridiculed/barked at - just because things weren’t apparent, it didn’t necessarily mean that they did not have something
**to be clear - I’m in no way referring to majority of system plays on here - been at this for 20 plus yrs to know that even when you have got something special on paper/comp - the real test comes when successfully applied in real cash conditions

**I have said this before - do you honestly think the ones that have got something would have divulged/layed it out for all to see
**When you were doing your ground work -  did you find all the answers in one place, **were they obvious and did they make sense at the start!? ....**they were all ideas/leads - you had to go and wrk at it for self before you convinced yourself that they were indeed axioms! ....same with system plays 

Haha! Yes - best we move on
- it's cycles of circles here!

[Roulettebeater]

Coding an app with key input and analysis is easy.

You've got the wrong idea about roulette computers. They don't hang over the wheel. Players with my hybrid could even be strip searched and all there'd be is a normal phone.

Piss easy.

But you can't be vague with programmers. You need precise algorithms that can code.

I guess you mean mobile app !
But the issue is that lots of casino don’t let you use your mobile when you are near the roulette table!

That’s a big concern for me, as this solution isn’t viable at least in the long term

What other possible solutions are left ?

[luckyfella]

Because not every system has no effect on prediction accuracy

Good eyesight, strong legs and functioning brain

[Steve]

But the issue is that lots of casino don’t let you use your mobile when you are near the roulette table!

They never see it.

That’s a big concern for me, as this solution isn’t viable at least in the long term

Do you know what I've been doing for over a decade? This is right up my alley. Hiding it is never a problem. Neither is covert use. The problem is more avoiding detection if you are winning larger more worthwhile amounts.

What other possible solutions are left ?

What you want is easily done. Ive already done it with different versions and I worth with this technology and associated issues literally almost every day. First I suggest do proper testing of your algorithms as there's no point if you arent 1005 sure it works.

Good eyesight, strong legs and functioning brain

Welcome to the club. Have a cookie.

[Steve]

who's system and who's principles?!

Whoever invented the universe.

your view and take on it?

It's not a view or opinion. It's just understanding of basic verifiable principles.

I am voicing for certain posters past and present that have graciously shared info and have been ridiculed/barked at

When they are incorrect, i explain their mistake and how to verify it themselves.

do you honestly think the ones that have got something would have divulged/layed it out for all to see

No but I'm not talking about that. Im talking about clearly incorrect theories and logic.

When you were doing your ground work -  did you find all the answers in one place, **were they obvious and did they make sense at the start!? ....**they were all ideas/leads - you had to go and wrk at it for self before you convinced yourself that they were indeed axioms! ....same with system plays 

Youre missing what I'm saying. Im only talking about clear mistakes