MATRIX 9

[ignatus]

Well now, let's see what do we got? This one, from 3 short testings is Not a flatbet winner, strange enough? it will win with a very mild progression Steve/Atlatis-like ...i promised myself not to reveal it until i got to top 3 on the MPR, so i did...in 2 days..haha  nice one, this can give good profits, in short time,,...perhaps one of my better ones? well? test it youself and see?...furthermore, as i said, i don't belive in keeping anything "secret" or "selling systems" Because this forum and you guy keeps me motivated to keep playing through these years.. so knock yourself out! 

Procedure: BET 12 splits covering 15 numbers. (see pic!) Now, the main focus here, are the 9 "inner numbers" (within the green square, see pic!). THIS is a static bet, (doesn't change) only progression/bets are increased and decreased.

Progression: Mild negative, +1u for each 4 spins the 9 "inner numbers" are Not hit. As soon as you get 1 hit within any of the 9 "inner numbers" and reach a new high, reset to 1u bet.

This is not exactly how i play ...but i rather stop at +100 etc (or more) not more than +500 (played with 5u bets), then i reset.

Test 1 (5u bets, Random spins), This was played witrh a little more agressive progression (+1 for each loss of a cycle of 4 spins, when not any of the 9 inner number hit And/OR +1u when hit within the 9 inner numbers..) Then reset.

[Ricky]

Hi ignatus
Any reason you chose that set of static number? The challenge I see with this bet selection is the need for timing your entry to ensure you don’t get caught  betting during a long period where these numbers go cold.
There are methods we can employ to check the distribution of numbers in the wheel prior to placing this sort of bet. Eg you may check that there is a repeat of both high numbers and low numbers before you ex cute the bet selection. This ensures that the wheel or RNG is distributing its numbers in recent spins evenly

Also, maybe we can chose 3 sections of be wheel to apply this bet selection and let the wheel determine which section we should place these bets.

These suggestions may improve the outcome for long term play

Cheers
Ricky

[Mako]

Ricky, how are you man, good to see you posting. 

I've been testing this over the weekend and it's extremely strong.  Even with static number choices (no bet selection system) I'm finding that in 70% of the tests it doesn't matter, it wins dramatically, without large drawdowns.

The other 30% of the time, you accidentally chose the 9 inside numbers that wound up being either the lowest hit during the 300+ spins, or say 2 of the 3 streets of those 9 inside numbers were the lowest hit.

In that specific scenario, 3 out of every 10 games basically, the drawdowns are much bigger...but...it still recovers to win, amazingly.

I even went and ran through downloaded spins to purposely "find" the worst 3x streets in a spin set, then used those exact bad streets/numbers to go back and replay the entire session with bets just to try and sabotage it, and again just the drawdowns were affected.

If someone finds a better bet selection for the 9-inside numbers to better take advantage of what the wheel is showing, something like Ricky mentioned to make it more precise, the drawdowns could be largely eliminated.

It's a great fun method to play though, it recovers so fast.

But even just as it is now, 

[ignatus]

Thanks, now.. i don't believe in "changing/switching bets"? but you could try this if you like,..perhaps wait for 2-3 virtual losses before placing a bet, that's the only thing i can figure?,..idk... i play non-stop..sometimes you get a run from hell, yes? happened once on  the MPR, i reached Max bet (20*5u, 100u bets, then i flatbet until i reached a somewat good positive balance before before i reset, That was scary as hell...anyway, to be realistic, a large BR would be needed incase these runs-from-hell would happen, what exact BR that would be idk yet?, But for now i'd say a minimum of 1000u (played with 1u bets) would be a good start. As you can see in this example, a small drawdown, but it recovers soon, and reached the wingoal (+500u)... ofc, more testing is needed, but this was just a demonstration, because i don't feel like you really believe in this bet? Test it yourself, would be the best thing, (and share your result?)....it would not be so difficult to code this one, i cannot , because i don't know how to code the progression "stop/reset when reached a new high" etc..

btw. i forgot to mention, how i play it,..(progression +1u after 4 spins) IF you get Any hit (Within the 9 inner numbers), while calculating these 1-4 steps, RESET and start calculating anew from 1...

Test 2. (1u bets, Live-spins)

[Mako]

#2 on MPR now, Normy's in trouble...! 

Good job Iggy 

[ignatus]

#2 on MPR now, Normy's in trouble...! 

Good job Iggy 

haha yess, just give me some time, i get him! 

[ignatus]

Test 3-4 (1u bets, Live-spins)

[ignatus]

Test 5. (1u bets, Live-spins)

[ignatus]

Well now, it's the Second time i reach Maximum bet on the MPR with the +1 After 4 spins,....obviously, although this is a "mild"-negative progression, it has proven to be "too agressive",..i reached 100u and flatbetted myself up again, wasn't scared because i knew sooner or later my "bad luck" would turn, as it always (or in most cases happen?) "After a bad run, comes a good one etc"...so? I'd say this may not be a Flatbet winner(?) BUT using, what i figured now a "Flatbet-progression" seems to work better?, (and it feels much more safe) ..This is an experiment so far, but this is how i play now;

Begin with 1u bet (i play with 5u) Now as soon as you drop -500u *Double Bets* ..."wingoal" now, is always +500 (from the original BR) IF i reach that i reset to 1u, every time....Next- i doubled up Once...so the NEXT level is -1000u IF i reach a -1000u i double up again,...same thing, IF i reach my wingoal of +500u (from the original BR, I reset)...continue this procedure Until you reach a new high/wingoal (+500u with 5u bets)....for each -1000u doubleup etc...

I haven't gone Further than 1 2 4 now, But, it *Seems* to work better/"be safter", although as i said it may take longer to play..etc

[Thanatos]

Reallly good selection. Played it yesterday with a 331 unit bankroll and ended with a about 805-ish. Did take a good 2 hours. Also i must admit i moved the selection around a bit, especially as when one of the dealers started being all dozen 1& then all dozen 2. So you can certainly argue if "covering the last dozen" would also work as the h/l or doz 1/2/3 changing constantly is fairly uncommon too. Also betting after 1 virtual loss probably wouldnt hurt either. Sure you do loose on "streaks" but the didnt really happen that much or last that long that the wait isnt worth it.

[ignatus]

Reallly good selection. Played it yesterday with a 331 unit bankroll and ended with a about 805-ish. Did take a good 2 hours. Also i must admit i moved the selection around a bit, especially as when one of the dealers started being all dozen 1& then all dozen 2. So you can certainly argue if "covering the last dozen" would also work as the h/l or doz 1/2/3 changing constantly is fairly uncommon too. Also betting after 1 virtual loss probably wouldnt hurt either. Sure you do loose on "streaks" but the didnt really happen that much or last that long that the wait isnt worth it.

Great  congratz to your winnings! 

[Ricky]

really

To play this safe without getting into a losing streak for continuous spins try playing after a virtual win for 1 spin. If lose wait for next virtual win. Eventually you will get two wins in a row big avoid the LLLLLLLL from hell

[Ricky]

Ricky, how are you man, good to see you posting. 

Hi Mako doing well. Yeah I do not post here actively these days. Just doing my own thing with what I learnt and just reading other posts. If I like something posted I respond as here.
Still playing baccarat and roulette building my bankroll.

Cheers
Ricky

[ignatus]

Well, not everything i did was a failure, now, i stick to whats Works. And THIS betselection WORKS. That i know,....

To take ricky's advice, I meet you there, half-ways, now testing this with a POSITIVE-progression--crazy oscar's grind i call it!  it's exactly that! same as "oscar's grind" But *double up* for each hit,(each hit within the 9 "inner numbers" until reached a new high....seems to work very well...+1000u in 250spins, (randomspins, 1u bets)

[ignatus]

No need being "crazy"--A simple "Oscar's Grind" works just perfect +2000u in 160 spins. (5u bets)

OG=+1u for each HIT (within the 9 "inner numbers", IF not reached a new high, Until Any hit that you reach a new high, then reset/restart)