• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

Every system can win in the short-term. It just depends on the spins you play.

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

Test a simple Red-Black System

Started by RP501, Oct 29, 01:26 PM 2018

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

RP501

I'm not savvy as far as testing goes, so I was wondering if someone can test a very simple Roulette strategy for me.  I am using Online RNG Roulette Casino.

The Strategy is basically chasing the Red & Black.  The Progression is also very simple - Just re-bet and keep adding 1-Unit after each Loss or Win, until your Bankroll reaches a new +high, then just RE-SET back to 1-Unit.

I would like to find out what is the biggest Bet Unit, and what would be the max Bankroll Unit needed.  I know Table Limits will be hit, but I just want to know what the statistics would be for a NO-Limit Table, like for them High-Roller Whales in Vegas.  ;D

I'm figuring a 150,000 Unit Bankroll would cover it.  Not sure what the max Bet Unit would be.

Thanks!   :thumbsup:
If you believe it is IMPOSSIBLE to win at Roulette long-term, then you will never win. ... But, if you believe anything is possible, then you will find the way.

RP501

I was editing my post, but "time limit" expired.   :(  Here's my re-post:

---------------------

I'm not savvy as far as testing goes, so I was wondering if someone can test a very simple Roulette strategy for me.  I am using Online RNG Roulette.  Single Zero European Table.

The Strategy is basically chasing the Red & Black.  Just bet whatever shows up - Red or Black.  The Progression is also very simple - Just re-bet and keep adding 1-Unit after each Loss or Win, until your Bankroll reaches a new +high, then just RE-SET back to 1-Unit.

The Theory is -- The combined "runs / streaks" from both Red & Blacks will eventually cover (at some point) the alternating Red/Black RBRBRB... patterns because of the Progression.  It's a very mild progression, so there will be very long "grinding sessions".  But the mild progression will also reduce the size of the Bets to the bare-minimum, for those rare periods of drastic "losing patterns".

I would like to find out what is the biggest Bet Unit, and what would be the max Bankroll Unit needed.  I know Table Limits will be hit, but I just want to know what the statistics would be for a NO-Limit Table, like for them High-Roller Whales in Vegas.  ;D

I'm figuring a 150,000 Unit Bankroll would cover it.  Not sure what the max Bet Unit would be.

Thanks!   :thumbsup:
If you believe it is IMPOSSIBLE to win at Roulette long-term, then you will never win. ... But, if you believe anything is possible, then you will find the way.

Mako

Quote from: RP501 on Oct 29, 01:26 PM 2018
I'm not savvy as far as testing goes, so I was wondering if someone can test a very simple Roulette strategy for me.  I am using Online RNG Roulette Casino.

The Strategy is basically chasing the Red & Black.  The Progression is also very simple - Just re-bet and keep adding 1-Unit after each Loss or Win, until your Bankroll reaches a new +high, then just RE-SET back to 1-Unit.

I would like to find out what is the biggest Bet Unit, and what would be the max Bankroll Unit needed.  I know Table Limits will be hit, but I just want to know what the statistics would be for a NO-Limit Table, like for them High-Roller Whales in Vegas.  ;D

I'm figuring a 150,000 Unit Bankroll would cover it.  Not sure what the max Bet Unit would be.

Thanks!   :thumbsup:

A user named bellagiowner once talked about taking this idea to the double dozens, he basically played as you're describing, but bet on two of the dozens using a +1u progression that only lowered or reset once the balance got back to profit.  Since the hitrate is higher for the DDs versus ECs, it seemed like a fun way to play so long as you didn't make a career out of it and limited yourself to small sessions.

His premise really relied on streaks, that a DD could streak for a long amount of hits, and thus erase any negative balance more quickly than the EC version.

In a few quick tests with live spin data I had the units climb past 100u per dozen (1u base bets to start) and the recovery time went through the roof, i.e., would have to sit at the session for too long of a timespan to make it interesting...spending countless spins in recovery.

RP501

Quote from: Mako on Oct 29, 01:47 PM 2018In a few quick tests with live spin data I had the units climb past 100u per dozen (1u base bets to start) and the recovery time went through the roof, i.e., would have to sit at the session for too long of a timespan to make it interesting...spending countless spins in recovery.

I know what you mean!  I was playing another System (Practice mode, online RNG) and it took just over 1,000 spins and past 20,000-Unit bets (1-cents) and took just over 2 hours to recover and made a profit of around 1,300 Units!!!  I think I squeaked by with a 100,000-Unit Bankroll (1-cent).

I think the System was placing bets on the Corner 0-1-2-3-4 and Street 4-5-6.  I used TinyTask to semi-automate the betting, which made it much easier & faster!
If you believe it is IMPOSSIBLE to win at Roulette long-term, then you will never win. ... But, if you believe anything is possible, then you will find the way.

RP501

Quote from: RP501 on Oct 29, 02:05 PM 2018past 20,000-Unit bets

Miscalculated, it was just 2,000-Unit bets.
If you believe it is IMPOSSIBLE to win at Roulette long-term, then you will never win. ... But, if you believe anything is possible, then you will find the way.

Bigbroben

Hi,
ok, so just bet last outcome? I'll work something out, if you accept Excel random.

Thanks!
Life is hard, and then you die.
Mes pensées sont le dernier retranchement de ma liberté.

RP501

Quote from: Bigbroben on Oct 29, 02:44 PM 2018ok, so just bet last outcome? I'll work something out, if you accept Excel random.

Sure!  I just want to have an "idea" of what would be needed, just curios.

Single-Zero European.  Thanks, appreciate it!   :thumbsup:
If you believe it is IMPOSSIBLE to win at Roulette long-term, then you will never win. ... But, if you believe anything is possible, then you will find the way.

RP501

Quote from: Bigbroben on Oct 29, 02:44 PM 2018I'll work something out, if you accept Excel random.

... And please Test minimum 50,000 spins.  Thanks!
If you believe it is IMPOSSIBLE to win at Roulette long-term, then you will never win. ... But, if you believe anything is possible, then you will find the way.

Bigbroben

Tried to attach the file, it'S 5,5 Mb, max allowed is 2.

Will try in another way.  Will run a macro and send results.

PM or email maybe if you really want the sheet with the process?

Life is hard, and then you die.
Mes pensées sont le dernier retranchement de ma liberté.

Bigbroben

Ok,
so here are the results of150 runs of 50k spins each, playing the way you described.

Column B is the max prog reached in 50k spins, normally the one at the 50k-th spin since it mostly failed.
Column C is the max score achieved.
Column D: the highest the prog it went until recovery.
Column E: lowest score before it recovered.

The overall results are really bad.
Here is a typical graph:


Attached, the results file.

If you want the process sheet, please send twice 5000$.   O0
Life is hard, and then you die.
Mes pensées sont le dernier retranchement de ma liberté.

RP501

Quote from: Bigbroben on Oct 29, 05:33 PM 2018The overall results are really bad.

Thanks for the Test!  I wasn't quite clear on how that translates to what I understand it to be. So, what size "max" Bankroll Units did I need, using 1-Unit progression until Bankroll hits +positive, then re-set back to 1-Unit?
If you believe it is IMPOSSIBLE to win at Roulette long-term, then you will never win. ... But, if you believe anything is possible, then you will find the way.

RouletteGhost

the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

Bigbroben

Quote from: RP501 on Oct 29, 05:56 PM 2018
Thanks for the Test!  I wasn't quite clear on how that translates to what I understand it to be. So, what size "max" Bankroll Units did I need, using 1-Unit progression until Bankroll hits +positive, then re-set back to 1-Unit?

That would be column D plus E.
Life is hard, and then you die.
Mes pensées sont le dernier retranchement de ma liberté.

Bigbroben

Quote from: RouletteGhost on Oct 29, 07:37 PM 2018


Indeed RG, 50k spins graphs are uglier than cherry picked 100 spin graph.
It really doesnt compensate for inflation! 
Life is hard, and then you die.
Mes pensées sont le dernier retranchement de ma liberté.

RP501

Quote from: Bigbroben on Oct 29, 08:13 PM 2018That would be column D plus E.

<img src="link:://:.pichost.org/images/2018/10/30/ExcelTest.png" alt="ExcelTest.png" border="0" />

Min :  95 +  -1,425,367 = -1,425,272
Max :  11,897 +  -259 = 11,638

Never saw a Test done before, so I'm not quite clear on this.  :question:  Would that mean I would need a 1,425,272 - Unit Bankroll?  If that's the case, then that's hard to believe!!  :o  Or is it a 11,638 - Unit Bankroll, which would be more logical.
If you believe it is IMPOSSIBLE to win at Roulette long-term, then you will never win. ... But, if you believe anything is possible, then you will find the way.

-