My own system!

[Robbert]

Alright!

I finaly came up with my own system. Its an 8 number bet.

Tommorow when i am a little less tired i Will explain the rules.

I hand tested it for +- 670 spins.
Betting Numbers 1 till 8.

Props to ignatus for hotzone 8, it was my insperation.

Anyone knows a good betselection for the 8 Numbers?

[Bigbroben]

Was that flat betting?

[Mako]

Good job Rob, once the details are out we'll put it through thousands of actual spins, give you some feedback on where it's strong and where it's weak.

[Robbert]

Its with progression, involving quads/splits/singles.

[Robbert]

Alright here it goes.

Begin betting 2 quads (any quads?) with 1 unit., so 2 units.
With the progression 111/222/44

If you occur a loss, transform those quads into splits and again 111/222/444. Stay until new high.

Lost again? Transform the splits into singles with again the prog 111/222/444

If you lose that one. Return to the quads but then go for the 222/444/888 progresion and so on so on until you have reached a new high.


Feedback is welcome!

[Mako]

I am a sucker for elaborate parachute systems, particularly those extend my losing session into endless marathons of grinding torture, so I'm game...

Jokes aside, thanks for posting Robbert, appreciated. Will definitely test.

[Robbert]

I am a sucker for elaborate parachute systems, particularly those extend my losing session into endless marathons of grinding torture, so I'm game...

Jokes aside, thanks for posting Robbert, appreciated. Will definitely test.

No problem! Just my 2 cents.

[Robbert]

Alright here it goes.

Begin betting 2 quads (any quads?) with 1 unit., so 2 units.
With the progression 111/222/44

If you occur a loss, transform those quads into splits and again 111/222/444. Stay until new high.

Lost again? Transform the splits into singles with again the prog 111/222/444

If you lose that one. Return to the quads but then go for the 222/444/888 progresion and so on so on until you have reached a new high.


Feedback is welcome!

Always stay on the prog until you reach new high or lost, only if lost go to the next.

[Mako]

So I've been goofing around with another quad/corner bet that's been doing well, and thought I'd apply a piece of it to yours Robbert.

Basically I start fresh, spin the wheel, and wait until there are just 3 corners that haven't yet had a number hit in them.  3 unhit corners essentially.

Once that happened (typically 10 to 16 spins in) I began betting 2 of the 3 unhit corners using Robbert's progression/method, choosing the 2 corners that are in different dozens. 

On a hit, I reset the process, starting fresh, and waiting for 3 unhit corners again before proceeding. 

First test below, used downloaded spins from Duisburg, consecutively at the same table.  As if you had sat down at Table 13 there and played for 306 spins.  The progression never got past Robbert's 111/222/44 first level, the two largest dips are the first and second "4" bets winning on the initial corner bets.

Looks good, fun to play, easy, will continue testing later tonight. 

[Robbert]

Great!

Only, its not my progression. Its from ignatus, so props to him!

[Robbert]

Mako, how is the testing going?

[Mako]

I fooled around last night and didn't get to test more, will put it through another session today.  It's good though, can tell that it would take a long time to bust using the hybrid method where you're starting the parachute after already having probability in your favor anyway by selecting corners that are overdue anyway.

I've said it previously but if it's all fallacy, (and it is yes of course we admit it freely, not a problem) then at least lets use fallacy systems that can go a good bit before having trouble, or ones that don't demolish the bankroll so quickly when the black swan finally arrives. 

[daveylibra]

I love a graph like that Mako !
But we don't seem to have a stop-loss. How about just using 111-222-444 and then reset, as I notice you didn't get past that point in your test?

[Robbert]

Think its better to stick with the prog. Cant wait for the graph with many many spins mako!

[Bigbroben]

Programming the original version with any corner would be rather easy.  If playing the ''coldest'' 2 corners it would be harder,at least for me, since a decision has to be made between 3 or 4 corners.

Could do the 1st version with Excel, it's pretty simple if all corners split nrs remain the same.

First fun game I tried with cold corners is promising.  Did not bust yet.