Question to the expert ...

[Roulettebeater]

Hi roulette experts !


Suppose we have a system that uses variable (a) in order to predict the outcome which itself is variable (b).

In order to produce accurate predictions these two variables have to be correlated... now the question that comes to mind is, what is the minimal required level of the coefficient (r) that needs to be met in order to say that a system has an advantage.

[The General]

Hi roulette experts !


Suppose we have a system that uses variable (a) in order to predict the outcome which itself is variable (b).

In order to produce accurate predictions these two variables have to be correlated... now the question that comes to mind is, what is the minimal required level of the coefficient (r) that needs to be met in order to say that a system has an advantage.

In order to win, you need to be able to predict a single number with a greater than 1/36 frequency.  Ten numbers 10/36.  Twelve number 12/36.
Anything less and you will break even or lose in the long run...even with an up as you lose progression.

By the way, once you do get the edge, then never ever waste your time and money running an inefficient up as you lose progression.
Here's why...

1. The initial bets are too low.
2. The draw downs are horrible.
3. You can't win much using one.

[RouletteGhost]

good luck finding an expert on a negative expectation casino game LMAO!

[Roulettebeater]

good luck finding an expert on a negative expectation casino game LMAO!

you seem have lost all the hope in roulette.. did you already give up?