$100,000 Holy Grail Roulette System Challenge

[Joe]

Ignatus, good effort but this just isn't a playable system in practice. The second chart is worse than the first in terms of win rate. You made roughly 1350 units in say 230,000 bets. That's 1 unit every 170 spins on average, and there are some pretty harsh draw-downs. Even if the system was a real long-term winner, you would have to use large stakes to make it worth your while, and therefore you would need a massive bankroll.

[pepper]

REALLY? Try to invent a system that pass 100 000 spins...Even that is not easy... idk what you talk about.. eh?

I have looked at and identified things I could do to possibly beat millions of spins. Of coarse, it eventually losses. Since you guys are using computers and everything, why not run the system through like 25 million spins or more just to make sure? Let the computer do the work and go eat lunch.

[Steeefan2014]

I have looked at and identified things I could do to possibly beat millions of spins. Of coarse, it eventually losses. Since you guys are using computers and everything, why not run the system through like 25 million spins or more just to make sure? Let the computer do the work and go eat lunch.

Well... if you think that someone will leave a bot working continously for 47 years to play 25mil spins......

[Steve]

I have a system that beats 100m rng spins about 90% of the time.

Here's how it works...

The trigger focuses on betting against rare events. The trigger means we bet just once in 100m spins. We bet about 30 numbers.

I win almost every time. Cool huh?

FORGET ABOUT "SURVIVING" SPINS.

[Steve]

I promise anyone still chasing their tail, keep going and you'll eventually understand what I've said is true.

You'll also understand most if what I've said is really old news.... in circles of well educated people, or other professionals in this industry.

And you'll also understand you've been wasting your time.

But it seems everyone just needs to learn for themself.

[Clf7]

As i understand steve rng cant be beaten by a method, you only offering this challenge in case(1 in 1 million) a miracle appears.

[Steve]

Im offering it for a few reasons. Including but not limited to a genuine offer to buy a non exclusive licence, and plain putting my money where my mouth is. There's more though.

The hg would need to decode the nature of reality. That doesn't mean crap like the law of a third.

Also I don't need the hg or any system. So my motives are different to what people might think.

[Clf7]

Im offering it for a few reasons. Including but not limited to a genuine offer to buy a non exclusive licence, and plain putting my money where my mouth is. There's more though.

The hg would need to decode the nature of reality. That doesn't mean crap like the law of a third.

Also I don't need the hg or any system. So my motives are different to what people might think.

Ah so you mean basically it could be beaten only by a method based like for example Tesla or something else more "metaphysical" that finally could explain and be applied on many other things in life......If yes i dont understand how can something like that be mechanical?

[Steve]

That's like science vs religion. It's the same thing.

I've mentioned what i think has potential, and what is clearly just repackaged crap.

[Steeefan2014]

Ah so you mean basically it could be beaten only by a method based like for example Tesla or something else more "metaphysical" that finally could explain and be applied on many other things in life......If yes i dont understand how can something like that be mechanical?

CLF, I know we've had our contradictions in the past, but this time I have to agree with you (except the part where you say that it can be applied in other things in life)! In my opinion, there is 99.99999999999% impossible to have a mechanical system that meets all Steve's requirements.

Not even roulette computers that Steve promotes are not made to win every single bet! Or to bet every single spin!

[Clf7]

CLF, I know we've had our contradictions in the past, but this time I have to agree with you (except the part where you say that it can be applied in other things in life)! In my opinion, there is 99.99999999999% impossible to have a mechanical system that meets all Steve's requirements.

Not even roulette computers that Steve promotes are not made to win every single bet! Or to bet every single spin!

I have zero problem with differences of opinion or with criticism, unless there are  insults. So all cool Buddy  ..... Btw yes i cant understand also how can a method meet steve's criteria, the chance of finding such a method is like the chance of winning in Lotto

[Steeefan2014]

such a method is like the chance of winning in Lotto

I think I'll take my chances at Lotto!

[Clf7]

I think I'll take my chances at Lotto!

So you will try the 2m Challenge too?

[Steeefan2014]

So you will try the 2m Challenge too?

Right at this moment I am testing my system for the 2m spins (the one file that Steve recommended). We'll see how it works, I'm pretty confident.
Of course I can't meet Steve's requirements, but... if it shows to be profitable................ it won't be cheap

[Moxy]

They're common limits. I'd like to be able to use it widely.

Yes, because I've seen losing systems beat 1m spins many times before.

Not necessarily. But it should be a significant profit.

Good question. But I'm offering regardless. I'd offer more if there were exclusive rights, but I wouldn't be able to enforce that, would I?

It's not like I'm forcing anyone.

Desperate and/or uninformed people will always bite. 

Here's the flip side to your argument.  So one could settle for only 100k due to non-enforceable NDA, according to you, and then you could turn around and sell it for an actual fortune a la a Micheal Jordan Nike contract, to some rich investor who actually agrees to a signed NDA from you?

You really don't need it as you stated but doesn't mean you can't pilfer a fortune from it.

Come on now, Steve.  I'm on to you.