General your opinion

[nottophammer]

You missed the best one thou.

How many re-sets to Bank Roll

I don't see a problem with resets.

BR is bigger than winnings; so must be re-sets, so more re-sets method must be no good.

[The General]

BR is bigger than winnings; so must be re-sets, so more re-sets method must be no good.

Notto,
I'm not sure I understand what it is that you're trying to say.  You're not exactly articulating your point. 

Again, I don't see a problem with more than one account.    I don't see a problem with resets when you're just messing around with something.  But if you're trying to claim that you have something significant, then you should do so by demonstrating a relevant number of spins, not just a few hundred or thousand.  The win rate that you show above doesn't convey anything of value because we don't know how many spins were bet, or how far away from the theoretical you are performing.  It just shows that you're barely winning on one of several accounts.   

[nottophammer]

Thats not me by the way.

But you can't keep getting extra bankrolls; if you could why would you bother with roulette.
Most on here; if kept losing their bankroll would be bankrupt.
So it has to be one bankroll to prove you have something.

It has played 2276 spins

Now for your info: back some time i was top with a player name of TTTKA using double dozens when ghost was in 3rd and before the re-set of spins; etc: But even that had many re-sets, so pointless result.

Unlike my player here


See the starting BR is in tact, no getting another 5000 and another 5000, who'd have a bottom less pocket; i guess only you.

Do you like the name; i got it from you with your constant MPR is the gold "standard".

Here's a good example of re-set to  bank roll
Pointless

[Taotie]

Bombus has 4 resets. Playing inside numbers at the table limit of 100 units with a starting bankroll of 5000 units does not leave much room for error. A bad start will necessitate a few resets, big deal.




Keep playing, and it is only a matter of time before standard's bankroll does this....




 

[nottophammer]

A bad start will necessitate a few resets, big deal.

[nottophammer]

suppose Little bombus will lock me out now, and show what a tosser he is.
Turner going the forum will be a waste of time

[Taotie]

why would I lock you out?

Everybody logs on the MPR just to cause trouble and insult people, don't they?

You log on, don't even make any bets, and hang around calling people names, like Aussie twat, wanker, cuntie, idiot, useless loser, etc etc, and call steve a c0cksucker among other things.

And you admit to refreshing your browser in hope of causing a glitch to bump other players off...

No, why would I even consider locking you out?

[Steve]

But you can't keep getting extra bankrolls; if you could why would you bother with roulette.

"Keep getting extra bankrolls" is exactly what almost every player does, also known as "going back to the ATM".

Constantly resetting the bankroll wont make a difference. What matters is winnings vs losings.

And Notto, you are a deliberate troublemaker. You complain about trolls, but you're a troll yourself. You're like Maestro. You do whatever you can to cause trouble, then act innocent. You lose on MPR, then blame the game instead of looking at your system.

If you dont like MPR, then dont play on it. Nobody cares. Just move on.

[maestro]

You're like Maestro. You do whatever you can to cause trouble, then act innocent. You lose on MPR, then blame the game instead of looking at your system.

i will not post again so no more troubles

[RouletteGhost]

The opinion has always been the same

study the wheel
read the history of the game

its only been told 27 million times

[Steve]

RG would the truth change?

Why would someone not repeat themselves if the truth didnt change?

Why are so many simple questions repeatedly avoided?

I've said many times now.... attack the message, not the messenger. If everyone did that, they'd better understand the message from some of the more experience members is a lot more beneficial than rubbish like "random has limits" (without any substantiating information).

i will not post again so no more troubles

I understand. Your credibility went to a new low after being caught lying to members.

[maestro]

I understand. Your credibility went to a new low after being caught lying to members.

no i did not...you can say whatever you like and members can think whatever they want..good luck

[Steve]

Again anyone can check the images for themselves.

[maestro]

Again anyone can check the images for themselves.

yes there are online sites you can upload image and they will tell you if has been edited or not..easy

[maestro]

like so