Conclusion

[Nimo]

"unbeatable" ? We will see, i'm working on it but Rx fail to follow me... 
Almost half million spins done!

Looks similar to the 0.20 per spin win rate of my Dozens post.  Thanks for the code by the way.   

[Roulettebeater]

It's not the hit rate, its how they are played that matters.  Passion is correct it's a process.

Nimo

Maybe you and mister graph (passionruletta) have higher IQ than us.

What if do us a favor and explain what’s the hell are you talking about when you say the process that matters and not hitrate?

This logic is fuc**d up because it’s like you say, exam’s score doesn’t matter but the time of the exam !!

[Nimo]

Nimo

Maybe you and mister graph (passionruletta) have higher IQ than us.

What if do us a favor and explain what’s the hell are you talking about when you say the process that matters and not hitrate?

This logic is fuc**d up because it’s like you say, exam’s score doesn’t matter but the time of the exam !!

If you just play each number that hits flat bet, and stop each time you are in profit, you will actually make a tiny profit over a few hundred spins, before you get to a run where the repeaters aren't enough to cover the house edge any longer.  Usually around 50-100 units per 700-1000 spins.  Not really worth the time and effort.  However if you follow a process of how the numbers and repeats come up, you will get graphs with upward trends consistently.

There are more than one processes,  Passion is using Dyslexics, I'm using a different parameter, but results are the same. 

[Roulettebeater]

If you just play each number that hits flat bet, and stop each time you are in profit, you will actually make a tiny profit over a few hundred spins, before you get to a run where the repeaters aren't enough to cover the house edge any longer.  Usually around 50-100 units per 700-1000 spins.  Not really worth the time and effort.  However if you follow a process of how the numbers and repeats come up, you will get graphs with upward trends consistently.

There are more than one processes,  Passion is using Dyslexics, I'm using a different parameter, but results are the same.

Really ?
Come on mate, what you doing is hit and run, wait trigger then hit !

This approach is bad and you can use with whatever bets possible in roulette, you can for example bet last colour, or last dozen, stop for a while and play again  ...

In short, what you call process can be summarized in one sentence:

Hit and run, and be patient !

[Nimo]

Really ?
Come on mate, what you doing is hit and run, wait trigger then hit !

This approach is bad and you can use with whatever bets possible in roulette, you can for example bet last colour, or last dozen, stop for a while and play again  ...

In short, what you call process can be summarized in one sentence:

Hit and run, and be patient !

This is not how the process works.  I'm showing you what happens.  Its not what I do .  its a good basis to learn of what needs to be done. 

[Winner]

Play for lunch money this long term ,if you ain’t making 100.000 on a weekend give up all forum system.

[Roulettebeater]

Play for lunch money this long term ,if you ain’t making 100.000 on a weekend give up all forum system.

Many jusT want that, but the game has an awful sociological effect!

You step in for only a lunch in return but you exit with empty pockets so you fast for a couple of days !

[Winner]

Many jusT want that, but the game has an awful sociological effect!

You step in for only a lunch in return but you exit with empty pockets so you fast for a couple of days !

Those are the ones that become hypnotized as they walk in . Staying consciencely AWAKE takes practice.

[Winner]

[quote author = Roulettebeater link = topic = 21119.msg213900 # msg213900 date = 1544186207]
Really?
Come on mate, what you doing is hit and run, wait trigger then hit!

This approach is bad and you can use with whatever possible in roulette, you can for example last color, or last dozen, stop for a while and play again ...

In short, what you call process can be summarized in one sentence:

Hit and run, and be patient!
[/ quote]

You're wrong if you think I use a trigger!
I do not use trigger!
My game is continuous until I'm tired of playing!
But if I can tell you that all those who talk about ballistics, repetition, parachute, etc, do not really know what I mean by the process of play or it seems, if they knew that the process of the game would be dedicated to winning with it, Because it is safe and easy.

Well good luck to you

[daveylibra]

If you just play each number that hits flat bet, and stop each time you are in profit, you will actually make a tiny profit over a few hundred spins, before you get to a run where the repeaters aren't enough to cover the house edge any longer.  Usually around 50-100 units per 700-1000 spins.   

Really? Have you tried my basic program in my other thread? I'm convinced it shows that playing each number that hits flatbet (or any other way) does not often reach profit at all.

[nottophammer]

Davey
This sheet has 3 types of bet, i/we will know the answer in about 50 days time.



Perhaps all three will be minus

[daveylibra]

The 3rd column, flat bet spins 1-10.   Does this mean we are only betting on the last 10 numbers?

[nottophammer]

spins 1-10.

So you see it's the opening 10 spins of the daily televised game from jackpot247.com

[daveylibra]

Now I understand you! So after 48 runs, flat-bet, we see a 134 profit. That's promising!!
After all, we could choose any table, any time. 10 spins. Results should be the same.
Could this be "variance" (another word for luck) or maybe you are on to something?

[Mako]

We still don't have an RX .dgt that accurately plays the First 10 as Rik does, which could allow us not to have to do batches manually by going through historical spins by hand.

Iggy has done First 10 code previously (thank you!) but his doesn't pause/reset once the repeat is found (meaning if you hit the first repeat at spin 3 of the 10, it doesn't then remove bets and wait out final 7 spins before beginning a "new" First 10 when continuously testing at the same table).

Obviously pausing and "waiting" for a new 10 is fallacy, there's no difference in a wheel spinning with or without that gap in terms of likely results, but for accuracy's sake to exactly match the system's parameters...we don't have it coded.

We also haven't had the +1/Reset at BR positive version of MM coded as well, just flatbetting I believe. 

Big Ben, have you ever done the exact system in Excel with the +1/Reset MM, I can't remember...