• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

Progression bets are nothing more than different size bets on different spins. You could get lucky and win big, or unlucky and lose even more.

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

The new hopefull system of mine

Started by Jordan, Nov 03, 05:49 PM 2010

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Jordan

OK here is the  system all complete.
It is VERY simpleââ,¬Â¦BUT u will need a pen and a paper to track the progression.(It has 2 stages)

BETTING SELECTION
We bet in every spin THE SAME DOZ + THE SAME COLUM OF THE LAST OUTCOME.
(there is a reason for this because of the Possibilities + the Progressionââ,¬Â¦I will NOT  post the reason as it is very simple for an experienced player to understand but very complex to explain it)

PROGRESSION
1)We always start with 1 chip in every DOZ and COL(ALWAYS of the last outcome)
2)When we have to MINUS(because of a win) and we had bet 1 chip in a doz or col we still bet 1 chip(because we can t bet 0 chipsââ,¬Â¦lolââ,¬Â¦I am saying because I have seen that kind of questions in many forums)
3)The betting has 2 attempts-stages.
Eg. We bet 1 chip on a doz and we winââ,¬Â¦so we say that we won on the 1st stage
Eg We bet 1 chip on a DOZ and we lostââ,¬Â¦we then bet 1 more time the same amount ââ,¬Â¦so 1 chip againââ,¬Â¦So this is the 2nd stage-attempt..IF we will win with the 2nd attempt ââ,¬Â¦we say that we won in the 2nd stage.
4)IF we will win in the 1st attempt-bet of the stage we MINUS 1 chip.(in the DOZ or COLââ,¬Â¦depending of WHAT was the win on)
5)IF we will win in the 2nd attempt-bet we STILL bet the same amount of chips and we count again as the 1st stage of this amount of chips betââ,¬Â¦
6) IF we will lose all the 2 stages then we ADD 1 more chip in the DOZE OR COOLUM that has lost.

THATââ,¬â,,¢S IT!
ALL INSIDEââ,¬Â¦Maths and Possibilities!

DO NOT FORGETââ,¬Â¦.we follow the progression (in any stage) BUT we ALWAYS bet on the DOZ and COL of the LAST OUTCOME!


Jordan

So far I have tested 16 sessions of 100 spins each session(I belive is the best way to test any system)

The resaults were

1)+23
2)+42
3)+44
4)+6
5)+55
6)+12
7)+9
8)+27
9)-2
10)+10
11)+39
12)+22
13)+7
14)+30
15)+38
16)-26 (the hell session)

let s all do testing

TwoCatSam

Jordan

Well this is unusual.  Let me see if I have it right.

I bet on last dozen (or column) that came.  Say 3rd dozen, for example.  Now--2nd dozen comes and I lose.  I then bet two units on 2nd dozen as it is now the one that just came.  We are seeking back-to-back dozens, right?

Am I correct so far?

Sam
If dogs don't go to heaven, when I die I want to go where dogs go.  ...Will Rogers

sekuritati

Jordan, if I may make a suggestion

it is a statistical fact that repeated dosens/cols come in clusters, you as an experienced player should be aware of that. Its not uncommon to have 10 spins of chops followed by almost equal amount of double, triple repeated dosens/cols.

why dont you instead of betting every spin, just wait for a virtual WIN then start betting, sometimes it could save 10-15 steps of the progression

and by the way, I did not understand quite well do you bet on dosen+column when you lose

with TWOCATSAM's example:

I bet on last dozen (or column) that came.  Say 3rd dozen, for example.  Now--2nd dozen comes and I lose.  I then bet two units on 2nd dozen as it is now the one that just came.

ok this was 1 chip on 3rd dosen + let us say 2nd column. = BET OF 2 CHIPS
2nd dosen came and we did not hit 2nd column either.
Now we bet on 2nd dosen 2 CHIPS + let us say 1st column came 2 CHIPS on 1st column = bet of 4 chips

is this the correct way of the system?
if it is not a big problem would you explain it again in more details, we would appreciate it much, thank you

Jordan

TwoCAtSam

U are correct about the bet selection...BUT u are wrong in the progression that is the 80% of the systems succes.
Let me explain....

Because U lost the 1st attempt ,NOW u are in the 2nd attempt of the progression(2nd stage).
SO U MUST BET IN THE 2nd DOZ(that came) AGAIN 1 chip (and NOT 2 as u said)....
So now IF u will lose again in this second attempt...then and only then u will bet the new DOZ with 2 chips(u add 1 more chips)

so it is like that:

1 chip  LOSE
1 chip  LOSE
2 chip LOSE
2 chip  LOSE
3
3
4
4
ETC......

SO I reapeat again...
IF we will win in the 1st attempt...we MUST  MINUS 1 chip in the next spin.
IF we will win in the 2nd attempt ...we must BET again the same amount of chips...and we must start counting again from the 1st stage (of the certain amount of chips)

IF we will lose BOTH 2 attmpts then in the next spin we are betting +1 chip....

This is happening because the DOZ and the COL bets are 2-1 8)

sekuritati

NO my friend ...virual losses will ONLY mess mess the system UP!!!!
Virtual losses NEVER helped any system because U do not know when the WIN will come...so u can t afford losing wins......

Just stick to the system as It is......
Later when u will be testing an making good profits I will explain to u why it wins...
But as I posted above it is easy to understand.....

The progrssion is made for the most safe play...so even IF we have 10 chops..the bet will be ONLY 5 chips in that bet.

ps. IMPORTANT

I forgot to mention that....IF we have a win in a spin that BOTH DOZ AND COL won....WE MUST MINUS the bets 1 chip IN any stage that they are(even at the 2nd one)

Droganson

Made 150 units total with a drawdown in one session of -100. Working very well for me so far. Great work, Jordan!

Jordan

Droganson
Thanks man.

Are you sure that you were using the progression (of the 2 stages) correct my friend? Because the -100 inside the session sounds to me like  a VERY rare case!
But as you saw the Possibilites +the progression worked in the LONG tesrm and gave you a HUGE prifit.

With this system the more you lose...the more you will win after...Because this kind of possibility should hit MORE after a bad fluxuation....

2 more 100 spin sessions from me.

1)+9
2)+43

The sooner we will all test the sooner we will abort or take this system to real Casino and make money :)

Jordan

Here is the way I am tracking the progression NICE and EASY (it will also help you to understadn the progression

1   loss
1   loss
______

2  (because we lost the 2 stages of the 1 chip per bet)
2  WIN

______

2  ( we are betting 2 chips again because we won in the 2nd bet)  WIN

_______

1 (Now we bet 1 chip because we MINUS 1 chip because we WON in the 1st bet )

and so on.......

Here are more examples

1 L
1 L
____

2 L
2 L

_____

3 W

_____

2  L
2  L
_____

3  L
3  W
_____

3 W
_____
2

and so on
It cound be more easy mates!

Ps...make sure that in the paper that you will be tracking you are using a LIne (____) to spot the stages of the betting

I gave you all......it really couldn t be more easy ;D

We are betting IN EVERY SPIN..so it is easy and possible and not boring to play in REAL Casino.......

After a 0 you will still bet the same DOZ + COL of the number before the 0 (with the correct progression of cource)

Bayes

Not bad so far!

After some tests the results are quite good. I wasn't sure at first if the progression should be used separately (independently - so if a doz hits but a col loses you should increase bet on col and reduce it on doz) , but I see from the examples that it isn't played this way.
"The trouble isn't what we don't know, it's what we think we know that just ain't so!" - Mark Twain

Jordan

Please lets not change subject.
This is a system topic. I had to remove 2 posts that were off topic
thanks

And yes Bayes the progression is INDEPENDENT on the DOZEN and INDEPENDENT on the columns...

The examples that I gave above are ONLY for the DOZ ....U must do the same to columns ....
We are betting in every spin a DOZ and a column.,...we use INDEPENTENTLY PROGRESSIONS on each
thanks for the interest.

Jordan

0 is like any other number.
It isn t the 0 that is giving the 2.7 disadvantage to the player....

its the 35-1 .....in other words the ODDS...the payment.

Anyway.... the idea of playing 2 doz and 2 colms is very bad....Just stick to the system if u like it

thanks

chrisbis

It was an OR

Doz or Col

Doz/Col

Jordan

Its same man....not good...stick to the SYSTEM

chrisbis

Im plugged in man.

Upload the Matrix Orphus................

Jordan

MATE...the MATRIX is a Hollywood movie...hahahhaha

It doesn't need any MATRIX to play this so simple system. read again the rules.
Please ...all off topic posts will be deleted because this is a productive system and we do not want this topic to be full of uselles posts as it will confuse and make tired any new readers

thanks

-