The new hopefull system of mine

[Kattila]

Hi Jordan,

Can you be so nice and post an example with numbers(20-30 spins)
to see exactly how to play(what , where we bet and how much ...etc...)
I always do that (post examples in my systems)....so.......

Thanks.

[Jordan]

My friend Katiila

It doesn t need any more examples....

The WHERE is soooooooo simple ...we BET on the LAST OUCOME DOZ AND COL

The HOW MUCH TO BET is being given with perfect example on the DOZ ....
U must do the same on the colum....

Its really a childish system to play

I also gave u the way to track on the paper.....

[Fripper]

One question.

I came down -80 units and then back up again to +13 units, at this point I am at a very high point in the progressions. Shall we reset the progression when we have a new high?

Maybe I have missed this in your explainations.

I will report back with some testings. So far so good..


EDIT: Maybe we should atleast take down both the progressions to 5 units if we have a new high after a big drawdown.

[Ekis]

Thanks for sharing Jordan.  Just did a 100 spin test. 

Ended +96, but was minus 147 after 48 spin(after only 11 of 47 wins at the dozens and 12 of 47 wins at the columns). . . 

Just one question: Do you reset the progression when you are in plus?? 
In my test the bets got quite high in the end.  The highest bet was 15 at the dozen, and I find it strange that all your results have been in the range +/- 55 when the size of the bets are that high.  So I m not sure if I am doing if corectly. .

[Jordan]

FRIPPER

If we have a So much recover(we are in a new profit) and we are so High in the betting...then yes...it is good to minus some chips....But I wouldn t advice to start with 1 and 1 chips...Because wile you were losing as you saw....the wins became MORE and BIGGER...BECAUSE OF THE MATHS AND POSSIBILITIES of the system...this si its power.

It was a good question my friend that I had forgoten to answer

thank You

[Fripper]

My first session ended very good.

1) +114 units in 100 spins

Bankroll attached



OK Jordan, what do you think about taking the bets down to like 5 units on both dozen/column after we have had a big drawdown and we are back to plus?

[Jordan]

Thanks for the testing Fripper

EkisNo...it isn t OK to restart the progreesion after a new PLUS.....because the system lose its POWER and profitability

Fripper

This was strange to me too.

Are you building up the progression with +1 chip when 2 consecutive bets of the same amount of chips are Losing?
Or are you building up +1 chip in EVERY loss?

[Fripper]

I do as the rules says.

I have one independent progression for dozens and one independent for columns.

So, I use this one each of the progressions:
1122334455667788

If lose, one step at the right, if we win one step at the left.

Or maybe I have missunderstood?

[Jordan]

No Fripper... you don't have everything correct

I said 3 times....that :

IF we will win at the 1st step we MINUS 1 chip
IF we will win at the 2nd step(that has include the same amount of chips as the 1st step) we BET the same amount of chips....BUT we are restarting the 2 steps (with the same amount of chips)

IF both DOZ and COL (in the same spin) will win we are MINUS BOTH bets 1 chip(No matter if we were in the 1st or 2nd step)

Please read again all my posts...I have explained everying in FULL details!!!

U are NOT playing it completely wrong though.....
BUT the maths aren't SAFE with the way that you are playing and this is why you experienced a so BIG sown inside the session.

[Jordan]

OK 1 more BIG example  with Ls and Ws:

DOZ and chips we bet

we start with 1 chip so:

1  L
1  L
____

2 L
2 L
____

3 W  (so because we WON in the 1st STEP of the 3 chips bet...we have to MINUS 1 chip)
_____

2  L
2  L
____

3  L
3 W (we must bet AGAIN 3 chips in the next spin because we had the WIN in the 2nd step of the 3 chips betting)
____

3 W(Now we MINUS 1 chip in the next bet because we WON in the 1st attempt of the 3 chips betting )
____

2

And so on!

with this way we are building profit with SAFE PROGRESSION

ps.It was teh most accurate and easy way to show u how we treat this progreesion.
Sorry I can t do more to explain.....
If you will not understand it again I will start ripping my clothes OFF...

I was makeing a joke ppl....

[Fripper]

One thing that I missed, I just saw it.

1  L
1  L
____

2 L
2 L
____

3 W  (so because we WON in the 1st STEP of the 3 chips bet...we have to MINUS 1 chip)
_____So, when you win here, you go back 2 STEPS. I think I get it know, puhh.

2  L
2  L
____

3  L
3 W (we must bet AGAIN 3 chips in the next spin because we had the WIN in the 2nd step of the 3 chips betting)
____

3 W(Now we MINUS 1 chip in the next bet because we WON in the 1st attempt of the 3 chips betting )
____

2

[Jordan]

YES FRIIPER EXACTLY ...This was your mistake....
I also removed some posts of ours in order NOT to confuse the other members....

well done mate...I think now you know how ro play it....
This was the reason why your progression was Building up so dangerous...BUT as you see even with a wrong progression you made a HUGE profit(this is because you obeyed some of the rules)

Now if you want...test this session again to see the Correct results...this will show us the POWER of the correct progression

ps. You have my respect Fripper!

[Fripper]

Ok people, I will try to give you a easier way to understand all this  


We have one independent progression for dozens and one independent progression for columns.

So, we can use this one to each of the progressions:
1 1 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8

1 Step is underlined. So here we have 16 steps.

If we win at lets say the second step of 4, we go back one step. So we will then bet 4 units again, but we are know at the first step.


If we win at lets say the first step of 4, we go back 2 steps. So we will then bet 3 units, but we are at the 1 step of 3 units.


If you lose, you go one step to the right.

One more thing:
If you win with both the dozen and the column at the same time, you should go back 1 unit and start at the first step of that unit.

Jordan, correct me if I am wrong.

[Proofreaders2000]

Will this work on an RNG Wheel?

[ADulay]

OK, I just had to at least try it.

3 runs of 100 spins each.

+18
+9
+31

This was betting only on the dozens and not both the dozens and columns as I wanted to make sure I was getting it right.

The lowest drawdown in any of the three runs was -26 in the first run.

AD