The new hopefull system of mine

[Fripper]

Will this work on an RNG Wheel?

If you have an fair RNG it should be the same, if you ask me.

My first test was on RNG and I will continue to test in RNG.

[Ekis]

Looks good so far did another test + 138 in 100 spin.

Will do some more tests later=)


my testing so far
1: +96 (-147)
2: +138 (-15)

[Jordan]

Well done Fripper...U explained it CORRECTLY!

For me people RNG is NOT roulette....BUT what can I say ... its your personal choise.

BUT please after a testing post IF it was RNG or REAL WHEEL

thank u

I am glad that we are ALLLLLLL winning

Ps. It will be nice for us to post also the DOWNS of the seesions in order to find what is the best BR of the system and also the best Winning Target.

In my testings the bigest DOWN was -96 chips.

I guess that the BR should be 80 chips and the profit target about 40 chips....
But the more tests we will have,the best choises we will make

[Jordan]

3 more 100 spin sessions from me:

1) +37
2) +91
3) +29

I just calculated all the wins-losses sessions we ALL togeather have and we are +1101 chips

the bigest - in the end of a session was -29 chips......

Do you think there is still hope?  LoL

I personally in 3.5 years of experience and member in all the roulette forums...I have never seen something like that.....Lets hope it will last......

we have all together played around 2.500 spins .......
I guess the BIG surprize is to be a long term winner in more than 30.000 spins.
So we need total of 300 X 100 spins sessions

[Jordan]

If it will be proved as a LONG TERM WINNER I will take 3 BRs with me and I will go to the Casino.
I will pick a table and I will stay there .... My bears and hair will grow....I will have meals on the roulette table and i will hire a person to bring me equipment to pee and poop....

I will take piils and drink Coffies and red bulls in order not to sleep and after 1 months of concecutive play I will return home as a MILLIONER!!!!

And i will be sleeping for the next month 24/7 

HAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHA!!!!!!!!!!

DREAMS!

[Monte Carlo]

Jordan,

The separation of the two bets into individual probabilities means we can look at the bets individually.  This part of the system makes sense.

What I can't figure out is the progression.  Simply put it will lose money.

1 W=+2 L=-1
1 W=+1 L=-2
2 W=+2 L=-4
2 W=0   L=-6
3 W=0   L=-9
3 W=-3  L=-12
4 W=-4  L=-16
4 W=-8  L=-20
and so forth

Since you are betting for a repeat and haven't covered all probabilities the odds are 1:3 with the payout at 3:1.  Essentially you will get crushed by the zero and are relying on deviations from the mean in relation to doz or columns repeating.

Perhaps if you stopped earlier in the progression the missed bets would reduce the money on the table in actuality while keeping them in theory.  thereby overcoming the odds.

The other option would be to inverse the bet at a loss.  Statistical clustering could allow for enough wins to occur before losses.  It a chop between the two theoretical outcomes that would hurt you.

Monte Carlo

[Jordan]

The resaults and the MATHS+POSIBILITIES of the system are great.....

the Future will tell

why don t u test with us?

[Hermes]

The progression is OK. What I understand Jordan plays always last dozen and column what give a chance that eg. dozen is choppy but column is streaky. This would balance the system and when both win it is a big celebration.
I would play the progression like that: if both lose rise one level, if one win and one lose keep the same and if both win go to minimum.
I created system like that and was successful most of the time.
Cheers Hermes

[Compa]

Good work Jordan. Make it 30x100 sessions with only one session lost and its a HG.

Cheers

[Monte Carlo]

Hermes,

The bets are progressed independent and therefore separate.  You are simply playing the same system twice in different ways.  This means that they can be looked at independent.

If you modify the bet structure to being co-dependent thereby turning this into one system, you would suffer statistically in the short term at the intersecting bets. 

Monte Carlo

[Ekis]

I have just used numbers from Spielbank Wiesbaden in my tests. In my third test I used the first 100 numbers from table 3 03.01.2010 and I got a heavy loss.. The numbers are attached. Can anyone else test the same numbers?? Hopefully I am doing something wrong:)

[Jordan]

Hermes
Yes you are right...this was my intention
But my progression is better...more profit

Compa
Thanks for the nice words.
We are all trying to finish with the testings...But for me 3.000 spins aren't enough. 30.000 would be something!

Monde Carlo
U are mistaken. Me and Hermes are correct  

__________________________________________
All silly and negative posts will meet the DELETE button.
This is a productiove thread

[Jordan]

Ekis
Did u bet BOTH DOZ and COL? or just the DOZ?

[Fripper]

Got a bad session, ended -40 units.

We have to do something about when we have very high stakes in the progression.

[Jordan]

I really don't think that -40 chips is a BIG loss!
If you look our previous winning sessions it is a NOTHING!

we can t WIN in all the sessions people....it is completely natural! Its the unbeatable roulette that we have to deal with!
I think that all these BIG WINS Blind u and u forgot for 1 minute that we are playing with a beast ....

I am happy so far with the results