The new hopefull system of mine

[Jordan]

I posted a mistake that Monde Carlo was misteken....I thought it was someone else.I apologize to him.
(I can t remove in the post what I have written cause the MODIFY button no longer exist(

[Fripper]

I really don't think that -40 chips is a BIG loss!
If you look our previous winning sessions it is a NOTHING!

we can t WIN in all the sessions people....it is completely natural! Its the unbeatable roulette that we have to deal with!
I think that all these BIG WINS Blind you and you forgot for 1 minute that we are playing with a beast ....

I am happy so far with the results

I'm not saying that it is a big loss, and so far results have been good. I'm not negative at all.

Just saying that in spin 92 I was down 148 units.
Then I got some wins.

In my next tests I will decrease my progressions if I'm near +, I like it safer 

[Jordan]

Ok Fripper.
if u think that u can make any better modification it is welcomed... 

[Hermes]

I agree with Jordan, all games are beasts against the players because not fair rules. The casino almost always smiles on the end.  We have to pay respect to the powerful enemy against us and not to underestimate it, therefore play safely as possible.
We have some advantage against casinos also! We can change strategy or go home with small stop-loss and come next time and be a winners. Patience,patience, patience...
I am going on 21 November to Varadero, Cuba. I hope they have casinos there, otherwise I have only chase women and that's after while boring.
Hermes

[bella]

Jordan    I tryed this before  look up DOZ/COL REPEATER  last post AUG 4 2010

IT don't work to good  I tryed it with progression and flat and it flopped.. Try to use (Time Before Last)    not repeaters  TBL is the way to go with this.......  

[albertojonas]

Jordan    I tryed this before  look up DOZ/COL REPEATER  last post AUG 4 2010

IT don't work to good  I tryed it with progression and flat and it flopped.. Try to use (Time Before Last)    not repeaters  TBL is the way to go with this.......  

Same here

[albalaha]

Dear All,
               One thing that I do not like about Dozens/Columns is their fictitious nature.  These are bets upon table only and have no meaning upon wheel. What we can do is to take chances only. This type of betting ultimately fails very badly. Whether u play last or DBL or sleeper dozen/column, it doesn't matter much.

[Jordan]

Bella

TBL or LAST is exactly the same...Roulette can t understand this deference...lol
The point is to play in every spin the same desision as U started no matter it is TBL or LAST.

Albalaha

Roulette also can not understand if the numbers that we are betting on are wheel based or table based.
ALL wheel based systems are losing with the same way as the table ones.
The ONLY reason to play wheel numbers(cover sectors) is when u play AP

thanks

[albalaha]

Dear Jordon,
               I appreciate your point that sector(wheel) based system does fail also but in a sector, all the numbers are more closely related to each other than a dozen/column on the table. Isn't it? If it is not so, why the wheel is designed as 26-0-32-15-18........and so on and not 0-1-2-3-4-5.....and so on? Our ball moves on wheel and not upon table. Wheel and table are designed differently to create these fictitious set of numbers like dozen/columns/ECs etc. If this is not the reason, can you elaborate why it is so?

[Bayes]

albalaha,

Wheel and table are designed differently to create these fictitious set of numbers like dozen/columns/ECs etc. If this is not the reason, can you elaborate why it is so?

My guess is that it was designed this way to make it harder for wheel watchers to detect AP conditions which might arise. If the ordering of numbers was the same on both the wheel and the layout, it would be easier to spot bias, sector shooting etc. But the fact that the numbers are arranged differently doesn't change the fact that under "normal" conditions, there is no reason why a number should be more likely to fall into one pocket rather than another, so how the labels on the wheel and table are arranged is irrelevant.

[albalaha]

Roulette was designed 400 years ago and designed in this manner to create maximum disadvantage to the players who are staking their bets on table. If you see the wheel, numbers 1 and 2 are poles apart and if you are betting them u are not getting  2/37 chances practically to win.
It would be like putting 2 small nets upon two banks of river. American Roulette, furthered this ambition and created a wheel with neighboring numbers on the table exactly opposit each other and added an extra zero. If what I think is wrong, please enlighten me by telling how concept of so-called advantage playing came in the mind of the creator of wheel design, prior to people started playing upon it? Why in the table's design, zero was kept separate from all other set of numbers? Had this advantage playing been so effective as per the principals of physics/mathematics, why one of the greatest scientists on earth (Einstein) commented that only way of earning from it is to steal chips? Advantage playing is a vague concept and doesn't exist in reality.

[Jordan]

Albalaha

Bayes post is correct...THIS IS THE ONLY REASON WHY the WHEEL NUMBERS ARE SPREAD.
There is NO other reason.....

"""Advantage playing is a vague concept and doesn't exist in reality.""""

U are 100% WRONG!
Ap is for real!@
But these days is a lot harder because Casinos know about it.

[albalaha]

Albalaha

Bayes post is correct...THIS IS THE ONLY REASON WHY the WHEEL NUMBERS ARE SPREAD.
There is NO other reason.....

"""Advantage playing is a vague concept and doesn't exist in reality.""""

U are 100% WRONG!
Advantage-play is for real!@
But these days is a lot harder because Casinos know about it.

Yes, both of you are genius and Einstein was an idiot. Keep finding a biased wheel or counting speed of ball. Even roulette computers can't predict where the ball will land because of deflectors set on the wheel.

[esoito]

I've read the last few posts with great interest.

If a visitor from another planet were to read them he/she/it might ask why anyone bothers to play roulette at all -- given all the hurdles and difficulties!! LoL

Wouldn't it be a fair question?

[Jordan]

Einstein is out of the topic mate....He just said that with Maths you can t win in Roulette.

If you don't have the knowledje and having spent time to see what VB really is you can T make a conclusion.

I am the 1st of all the apers that say that winning with VB nowdays is VERY hard to imposible.

I really don't know how your post about the wheel sectors of the wheel converted into a fight about VB....

U mention the wheel number order in order for the math - possibilities system...this was the case......
And I told you that its same.....