Doz & Col

[Carsch]

This is doing good after testing 200 spins; and quite stable (it makes about 25 units per 100 spins).

Bet

1u on a Doz & 1u on a Col

Bet selection: SAME as LAST Doz & Col

If both sides (Doz & Col) lose 2x in a row all at the same time, bet on the NEXT Doz/Col that comes after the last hit Doz & Col.

Example of what I mean by NEXT Doz/Col:

Last hit Doz was Doz2 (13-24), the next Doz will be Doz3 (25-36)
Last hit Col was Col1 (1-34), the next Col will be Col2 (2-35)

Last hit Doz was Doz3 (25-36), the next Doz will be Doz1 (1-12) (we go around)
Last hit Col was Col3 (3-36), the next Col will be Col1 (1-34)

Must be -4 or more to start progression (no separate progression)

Progression:  2 - 3 - 4 - 6 - 8 - 10

Go back down in the progression as you win.

If a win brings your total balance in the plus (+) and your next bet is more than 1u, bet half that amount.

Ex: your next bet is 4, then instead bet 2.


* If a Doz or Col repeats 3x in a row, go same as last on both sides.

[Monte Carlo]

This is in essence the same system that Jordan proposed the other day.  The only difference is that you are combining the bets as a single system allowing a win in either field to count as a reset for both bets.

Again it's the progression that kills you right form the start.  Wins do not make up for cumulative losses.

For a progression to work in this case you would need to bet in each field

1-3-9-27-81

The win would always be 1u.

Hardly worth the downside risks (-121u)

Monte Carlo

[Carsch]

I'll test 1000 spins MC. If it makes it, i'll take it to the casino. If not, then it was just another idea.