F_LAT_INO - Promised Constant Win Bet (Sectors-Splits) Proving Grounds

[Twisteruk]

Ok another 103 spin test results in !

Played Recent every time except when Furthest was only option

Spins 103

Wins 14

Loss 9

(took ages to get bets tonight ! and then only 23 out of 103 spins !)

LLR 3

LWR 5

Z-Score 1.71

+136 Units

[albertojonas]

Ok another 103 spin test results in !

Played Recent every time except when Furthest was only option

Spins 103

Wins 14

Loss 9

(took ages to get bets tonight ! and then only 23 out of 103 spins !)

LLR 3

LWR 5

Z-Score 1.71

+136 Units

what means llr and lwr twister?

[chrisbis]

Longest Losing Run  (llr)

and

Longest Winning Run (lwr)

he posted it early .

[albertojonas]

Longest Losing Run  (llr)

and

Longest Winning Run (lwr)

he posted it early .

thx
too tired

[albertojonas]

After everything will be sorted out we can create soft for android based phones to play in real casino

by the way: official recomended proggresion is 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10?

they will smash our phones and kick us out!

[F_LAT_INO]

Jordan mate,

5,6,1,3 ---ARE NOT PLAYABLE

3 of the 4 sectors must be in 3 different dozens.

Rules are; To be playable 4 sectors must touch each column and dozen.Capito

Capito 
These rules were for further.
I just bet it differently for latest.
Just my choice.
But if you think it's better to stick to this rule for the last 4,
ok I will try it.
But do you think it's really important ? thanks for your reply.


MOST IMPORTANT

This is your chance to start believe.

[F_LAT_INO]

what means llr and lwr twister?

And z score?

[F_LAT_INO]

what means llr and lwr twister?

And z score?

[jordan69]

MOST IMPORTANT

This is your chance to start believe


Ok, i'll check it on my first tests (to see how it changes final result).
And stick to it for the next tries.

[F_LAT_INO]

MOST IMPORTANT

This is your chance to start believe


Ok, i'll check it on my first tests (to see how it changes final result).
And stick to it for the next tries.

Its should be tested by the rules,so we have
final result at the end.

Then you can start visiting casinos wit bags in your hands...LOL

[flukey luke]

I have put it through a few tests over the last few days, both furthest and most recent.
On the furthest, I set myself a profit target of 200 units. Yesterday, I got to a profit of 198 and then it collapsed going to stage 10 in the progression.
Today it did manage to just get over the 200+ profit barrier and then it collapsed going to stage 10 in the progression.

[attachimg=#]

Here is the way I see it. This system is not that much different to the Street Method I posted over on VLS and put up here. In that one, you wait for 5 streets to be absent for so many spins and then use a progression. The reality is that these types of systems are not really that much different from a martingale. Probably the difference is that you will not get wiped out as quick because of the waiting time involved to qualify a bet. This gives you the illusion that it is a winning bet. My hunch is that both methods will prove to be long term losers. Like the martingale, it will appear impressive because of the buildup of wins. But the sharp losses like you can see in the graph will wipe away all the profits.

[jordan69]

Its should be tested by the rules,so we have
final result at the end.

Then you can start visiting casinos wit bags in your hands...LoL

lol ! yes you're right mate !

but you know, i just look at it...
and it changes all my results... 
(remember, i play the lastest, not furthest)
for example, my first 108 spins : only 17 bets instead of 49...
and a lot of winning bets have been cancelled 
i'm not in + anymore.
maybe i'm doing wrong but i don't think so.

[chrisbis]

I find furthest gives best results with the occasional recent played
or even play both for a reduced but earlier profit.

[ophis]

Tracker v0.2

link:://rouletteforum.cc/other-software/constant-win-bet-tracker/msg20926/#msg20926

[GLC]

Flukie Luke,

Thanks for your tests.  I guess that what you're afraid of is that the 20,000 + spins FLATINO tested this on don't count because of your 450 spins.

It is entirely possible that you are correct and doomsday is coming. 

On the other hand, you may have just had a bad run which resulted in a loss which always makes one feel like crap and get a little depressed.

Kind of makes you wish someone would post another system with excellent potential so you could go over there and start testing it.  That usually cheers me up for a while.

I think you had a bad streak.  I have to give Flatino's 3 years of wins more weight than your 6 or 7 hours of tests.

I know you are just trying to be as honest with everyone as you can and we appreciate that.  I think we are all testing with a little anxiousness that this could, after everything, turn out to be another loser long term.

The more we test it under different circumstances and casinos, the better data we will gather and some will start playing for real money and others will start moving to other systems.  All for their own reasons.

If we proved to 99.99% certainty that this was a winning system, only a handful of members would go on to play it for real and generate money with it on a consistent basis.

Hey, maybe your wrong about this system and your street system, and they're both winners.

We all have a lot of respect for your knowledge about roulette and level headed approach to the game, so don't think the red flag you sent us is going unnoticed.

We're hoping that this system is not like the Titanic and you have just notified us that we have had a major encounter with an iceberg.

Hopefully, we will all be cautious if we decided to play for real money.

In the mean time, sounds like FLAT's taking the casino with his airball machine in it to the cleaners.

Regards,

George