F_LAT_INO - Promised Constant Win Bet (Sectors-Splits) Proving Grounds

[A3on]

Yes.

1. Original version stated to play on Furthest sectors.  (you can ignore Recent)

2. Version for AirBall stated to play on Recent sectors. (you can ignore Furthest)

3. F_LAT_INO recently wanted to test ZigZag Mod to play Furthest/Recent/Furthest/Recent etc. and NOT betting when Furthest AND Recent are available at the same time. You can read this few post before I think.

Recomended progression for now is 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10.  (-1 on win / back to 1st step when profit +10) but this may change if we will find something more efective

As I play at live roulette only, the right way to play will be:
Play on furthest sectors (even if are the two available)
Play on furthest sectors only when recent sectors are not available (not betting whn the 2 are available)
Play furthest and recent (only one of then when it's only one available and the 2 when are the 2 availale)

Witch one?

Best regards,
Afonso

[Twisteruk]

It does show both furthest and recent whenever they qualify.

Excellent !

Wish I cud see George's face when he reads all this  


He will be testin while we are sleepin  

[ophis]

As I play at live roulette only, the right way to play will be:
Play on furthest sectors (even if are the two available)
Play on furthest sectors only when recent sectors are not available (not betting whn the 2 are available)
Play furthest and recent (only one of then when it's only one available and the 2 when are the 2 availale)

Witch one?

Best regards,
Afonso

Play on furthest sectors ONLY (even if are the two available)

that's the original rules.

[A3on]

Thank you Ophis

I will post here my tets results as soon as I've some free time =)

Afonso

[flukey luke]

Went to the wolverhampton racecourse today and after finishing there, I decided to visit the city's casino and give this a quick workout.
I used the 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10 progression and only played the furthest back.
First of all, I would suggest not playing this in a land based casino before you are very comfortable with it. Some dealers like to spin quick and it can be hard to work everything out and then get it all down on time. Playing online is easier because you can just press repeat and add or subtract one depending on what stage you are at.
Anyway, I reached stage 6 once in the progression and stage 8 in another. At one point I was about 300 units down. Luckily I ended up breaking even and quit at that point. It was a bit of a rollercoaster and not what I am really used to when playing roulette. So on that score, it was a bit of an eyeopener 
I decided not to test it any further because the dealer was just spinning too quick. Maybe an extra hour or so would have resulted in some profit. Just sharing my experience of it in the trenches. 

[chrisbis]

Nice report there Captain Darling.

Keep up the good work, and well done on the Gee- Gees.

[Twisteruk]

Went to the wolverhampton racecourse today and after finishing there, I decided to visit the city's casino and give this a quick workout.
I used the 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10 progression and only played the furthest back.
First of all, I would suggest not playing this in a land-based casino before you are very comfortable with it. Some dealers like to spin quick and it can be hard to work everything out and then get it all down on time. Playing online is easier because you can just press repeat and add or subtract one depending on what stage you are at.
Anyway, I reached stage 6 once in the progression and stage 8 in another. At one point I was about 300 units down. Luckily I ended up breaking even and quit at that point. It was a bit of a rollercoaster and not what I am really used to when playing roulette. So on that score, it was a bit of an eyeopener  
I decided not to test it any further because the dealer was just spinning too quick. Maybe an extra hour or so would have resulted in some profit. Just sharing my experience of it in the trenches.  

Its good to hear that perspective luke

I posted the other day that I thought I would find it easier in a B&M Casino due to chip denominations
For example when your on 8 you have to do 2 2 2 2 or 5 2 1 as that's the chip levels......doing that 8 times takes too much time !

I am now using the software provided by ophis, speeds up things muchly  

[F_LAT_INO]

As I have said to Twisty,once you get used to it its so
very easy and smooth,and when I play am only looking
in 9 numbers,whenever real number spuns.

And now HELP question;
HOW DO I SHIFT THIS TOOL TO THE DESC.

Am so helpless doing these things.

Step by step pl.

[ophis]

As I have said to Twisty,once you get used to it its so
very easy and smooth,and when I play am only looking
in 9 numbers,whenever real number spuns.

And now HELP question;
HOW DO I SHIFT THIS TOOL TO THE DESC.

Am so helpless doing these things.

Step by step pl.

Just noticed this issue and fixed.
link:://rouletteforum.cc/other-software/constant-win-bet-tracker/msg20480/#msg20480

[flukey luke]

Just did a quick 100 spin test on rextreme.
I used the 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10 progression and only played furthest back. I did notice that the most recent were hitting almost on the first spin every time.
The starting balance was 500, on a win, as long as I was above 500, I just went back to the start of the progression again.
Here are the winning sequences in the progression and I will put up the bankroll chart as well.

1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1,2,3.
1,2.
1.
1,2,3.
1.
1,2,3,4.
1,2,3,4.
1.

[attachimg=#]

Fair play to you Flat, it looks great either way.  

[flukey luke]

The software by ophis really helps as well. Nothing beats a relaxing game of roulette. 

[albertojonas]

Just did a quick 100 spin test on rextreme.
I used the 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10 progression and only played furthest back. I did notice that the most recent were hitting almost on the first spin every time.
The starting balance was 500, on a win, as long as I was above 500, I just went back to the start of the progression again.
Here are the winning sequences in the progression and I will put up the bankroll chart as well.

1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1,2,3.
1,2.
1.
1,2,3.
1.
1,2,3,4.
1,2,3,4.
1.

[attachimg=#]

Fair play to you Flat, it looks great either way.  

this kind of sessions happen to me a lot...
that is why i take more risks.
use grand martingale as GLC sugested once...
my target is half my initial bankroll but in this example session it got me another entire bankroll

matter of taste/insanity/guts

[albertojonas]

Embrace the Madness

[A3on]

Awesome result my friend

I think I will test with that progression as well

[albertojonas]

Awesome result my friend

I think I will test with that progression as well

it will loose a lot...
can anyone test it for thousands of spins?