• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

The only way to beat roulette is by increasing accuracy of predictions (changing the odds). This is possible on many real wheels.

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

F_LAT_INO - Promised Constant Win Bet (Sectors-Splits) Proving Grounds

Started by albertojonas, Nov 06, 11:09 PM 2010

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 16 Guests are viewing this topic.

GLC

Quote from: albertojonas on Nov 09, 08:32 PM 2010
Embrace the Madness

:o

Alberto,

I don't know what to think about that progression. :'(

It was just a wild thought based on the idea that if the bet selection is a winner, we should be able to win with any progression so why not use one of the most aggressive bet methods we can imagine. :o

I didn't actually think anyone would try it, but, if anyone would I knew it would be you. :lol:

Scary results my friend. :o :o :o  

Just imagine if Ophis had been playing this progression when he did his original test and won 35 times to 3 losses.

Seems like you would have to have 4 or 5 banks of 456 units to feel safe in case you started off not so well.

I beg you not to play for real money with this progression until you've tested it "A LOT". :-\

Maybe start off playing for 0.10 units or something.

Just kidding (a little).  I know you're too level headed to do anything rash. :thumbsup:

Keep testing along with A3on.   This will have to pass the 3000 (or maybe 30,000) bet test  well ahead of the game before I could imagine anyone trying it for real.

GLC
In my case it doesn't matter.  I'm both!

albertojonas

Quote from: GLC on Nov 09, 09:20 PM 2010
Alberto,

I don't know what to think about that progression. :'(

It was just a wild thought based on the idea that if the bet selection is a winner, we should be able to win with any progression so why not use one of the most aggressive bet methods we can imagine. :o

I didn't actually think anyone would try it, but, if anyone would I knew it would be you. :LoL:

Scary results my friend. :o :o :o  

Just imagine if Ophis had been playing this progression when he did his original test and won 35 times to 3 losses.

Seems like you would have to have 4 or 5 banks of 456 units to feel safe in case you started off not so well.

I beg you not to play for real money with this progression until you've tested it "A LOT". :-\

Maybe start off playing for 0.10 units or something.

Just kidding (a little).  I know you're too level headed to do anything rash. :thumbsup:

Keep testing along with A3on.   This will have to pass the 3000 (or maybe 30,000) bet test  well ahead of the game before I could imagine anyone trying it for real.

GLC
too late!!
just did it...


and WON  ;D :D :xd:


1368 1Ã,£ chips in tha BAG! YUUPPI.

.not real. Just kidding.. :-[

GLC

One thing I will say is when it's hitting good, it does add up quick.  No long, drawn our sessions with this bet method. :)

You should post this under Esoito's "hit n run" topic. :thumbsup:

GLC
In my case it doesn't matter.  I'm both!

Twisteruk

Just had an awesome session !

Played 100 spins lasted 1.5hrs

Starting Balance was 1000

Played using $5 chips

Closing Balance was 2,260

ALL bets were won by the 4th bet

ALL bets were Recent except when Furthest was the only option

100 Spins

19 Wins

12 Loss

LLR 2

LWR 4

Z-Score 2.03
Its Set In Stone =)

Bayes

In view of the buzz around this system, I thought I'd check it out. First session:

132 spins
+99 units
LLR 5
LWR 3

Played on BV no-zero roulette.

Thanks to Ophis for the software, and of course F_LAT for the system.






"The trouble isn't what we don't know, it's what we think we know that just ain't so!" - Mark Twain

Twisteruk

Quote from: Bayes on Nov 10, 05:43 AM 2010
In view of the buzz around this system, I thought I'd check it out. First session:

132 spins
+99 units
LLR 5
LWR 3

Played on BV no-zero roulette.

Thanks to Ophis for the software, and of course F_LAT for the system.








Nice to have you testing with us Bayes  :thumbsup:

Did you play Furthest or Recent ?
Its Set In Stone =)

Bayes

Quote from: Twisteruk on Nov 10, 06:29 AM 2010
Did you play Furthest or Recent ?

Furthest only. Also, sometimes I would return to the first bet in the progression after a win, even though I was higher than step 2 - playing it safe.
"The trouble isn't what we don't know, it's what we think we know that just ain't so!" - Mark Twain

ophis

Quote from: Bayes on Nov 10, 09:21 AM 2010
Furthest only. Also, sometimes I would return to the first bet in the progression after a win, even though I was higher than step 2 - playing it safe.

Recomended "safe" progression.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

@Lose:
prg+1

@Win:
( IF profit>10u THEN prg=1 ELSE  ->  IF prg<4 THEN prg-1 ELSE prg-2
Multi Systems Tracker
➨ [url="//rmst.forumer.com"]RMST.forumer.com[/url]

jordan69

Hi guys,

I made some tests with FLatino system.
I bet on the last 4 sectors. No bets on further.

I used the following rules :

The 9 sectors have to be shown before i start to bet (19 spins in my first test)
Then i wait for 4 different sectors. When it's ok, i play these 4 sectors.
Ex : 4 8 2 3 or 5 6 1 3.
(In my test, i started to bet at spin 24)

I used this progression : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
+ 1 after a loss
- 2 after a win

I restart at unit 1 when level or ahead of the highest of the session.

After 230 spins : + 142 units  ;)

Highest drawdown : - 130 units after 163 spins.

Many thanks to Flatino and to everybody for the good work :)

Any constructive comments are welcome.

Cheers.

Jordan69

English is not my first language...
but i try my best !
Welcome to my polish friends !

F_LAT_INO

Quote from: albertojonas on Nov 09, 08:58 PM 2010
it will lose a lot...
can anyone test it for thousands of spins?
:-X

I have tested furthest for more then 20000 spins
Dublinbet,and the final score was 7300 chips with 1000 starting BR.
You can always get me on  
ivica.boban@ri.t-com.hr

F_LAT_INO

Quote from: Bayes on Nov 10, 09:21 AM 2010
Furthest only. Also, sometimes I would return to the first bet in the progression after a win, even though I was higher than step 2 - playing it safe.
[/quote
Thats exactly how I played while testong furthest
You can always get me on  
ivica.boban@ri.t-com.hr

albertojonas

Quote from: F_LAT_INO on Nov 10, 02:37 PM 2010
I have tested furthest for more then 20000 spins
Dublinbet,and the final score was 7300 chips with 1000 starting BR.


Dear F_LAT_INo

This was ment to the Embrace the Madness variation that i tried.
Not for the regular version, wich is very steady...


F_LAT_INO

Quote from: jordan69 on Nov 10, 01:18 PM 2010
Hi guys,

I made some tests with F_LAT_INO system.
I bet on the last 4 sectors. No bets on further.

I used the following rules :

The 9 sectors have to be shown before I start to bet (19 spins in my first test)
Then I wait for 4 different sectors. When it's ok, I play these 4 sectors.
Ex : 4 8 2 3 or 5 6 1 3.
(In my test, I started to bet at spin 24)

I used this progression : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
+ 1 after a loss
- 2 after a win

I restart at unit 1 when level or ahead of the highest of the session.

After 230 spins : + 142 units  ;)

Highest drawdown : - 130 units after 163 spins.

Many thanks to F_LAT_INO and to everybody for the good work :)

Any constructive comments are welcome.

Cheers.

Jordan69


Jordan mate,

5,6,1,3 ---ARE NOT PLAYABLE

3 of the 4 sectors must be in 3 different dozens.

Rules are; To be playable 4 sectors must touch each column and dozen.Capito
You can always get me on  
ivica.boban@ri.t-com.hr

F_LAT_INO

Quote from: F_LAT_INO on Nov 10, 02:39 PM 2010
Quote from: Bayes on Nov 10, 09:21 AM 2010
Furthest only. Also, sometimes I would return to the first bet in the progression after a win, even though I was higher than step 2 - playing it safe.
[/quote
that's exactly how I played while testing furthest

You can always get me on  
ivica.boban@ri.t-com.hr

jordan69

Jordan mate,

5,6,1,3 ---ARE NOT PLAYABLE

3 of the 4 sectors must be in 3 different dozens.

Rules are; To be playable 4 sectors must touch each column and dozen.Capito


Capito  ;D
These rules were for further.
I just bet it differently for latest.
Just my choice.
But if you think it's better to stick to this rule for the last 4,
ok :) i will try it.
But do you think it's really important ? thanks for ur reply.
English is not my first language...
but i try my best !
Welcome to my polish friends !

-