• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

Almost every system has been tested many times before. Start by learning what we already know doesn't work, and why.

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

Equilibrium - Imbalance

Started by ego, Nov 17, 03:11 AM 2010

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 6 Guests are viewing this topic.

Print
Go Down Pages1
User actions

ego

Nov 17, 03:11 AM 2010

Equilibrium is the condition of a system in which competing influences are balanced.

I just want to test for fun about this as perfect balance distribution with every event having one equal show is so rare  :twisted:
Denial of gamblers fallacy is usually seen in people who has Roulette as last option for a way to wealth, debt covering and a independent lifestyle.  Next step is pretty ugly-
AP - It's not that it can't be done, but rather people don't really have a clue as to the level of fanaticism and outright obsession that it takes to be successful, let alone get to the level where you can take money out of the casinos on a regular basis. Out of 1,000 people that earnestly try, maybe only one will make it.

ego

#1
Nov 17, 03:23 AM 2010

In every cycel you have a distribution - a dice with six sides wich have one show itch during six attempts is around 98% of probability not to happen - or i even assume is higher.
Nothing is due to happen but we all know imbalance is allways present.

If we take a look at 8 groups of three the imbalcance during 300 trails is clear and present.
Here below is one cycel.
1 stand for R and 2 for B.

2   1   2      212         
2   1   2
1   2   1      121      
1   2   2   122      
1   1   1      111   
1   1   2   112      
2   2   2      222         
1   1   2          
2   1   1   211          
1   1   2         
2   1   1
1   2   1         
1   2   2   
1   2   1
2   2   2      
2   1   1
1   2   1
1   1   1      
2   2   1   221    


Denial of gamblers fallacy is usually seen in people who has Roulette as last option for a way to wealth, debt covering and a independent lifestyle.  Next step is pretty ugly-
AP - It's not that it can't be done, but rather people don't really have a clue as to the level of fanaticism and outright obsession that it takes to be successful, let alone get to the level where you can take money out of the casinos on a regular basis. Out of 1,000 people that earnestly try, maybe only one will make it.

ego

#2
Nov 17, 03:25 AM 2010

Other ways is to use only four formations and no colours like R/B and one cycel would be.

xox
xxo
oxx
xxx

Exampel...

2   1   2 xox               
2   1   2
1   2   1            
1   2   2 xoo         
1   1   1 xxx         
1   1   2 oox
Denial of gamblers fallacy is usually seen in people who has Roulette as last option for a way to wealth, debt covering and a independent lifestyle.  Next step is pretty ugly-
AP - It's not that it can't be done, but rather people don't really have a clue as to the level of fanaticism and outright obsession that it takes to be successful, let alone get to the level where you can take money out of the casinos on a regular basis. Out of 1,000 people that earnestly try, maybe only one will make it.

ego

#3
Nov 17, 03:58 AM 2010

Waves would be three new events out of four with out any repeat if we would isolate it into two bets.
Exampel = WWLLWWWLLWWWLWLWLLWWLLWWLWLWWLWLLWLWLWWWLWW
That is 300 trails with a very even distribution - but nothing is due to happen.
At least some one use a dice with four sides and a wave or capturing repeats wich appers when there is imbalance wich is constant present.

2   1   2 xox               
2   1   2 xox W
1   2   1 xox          
1   2   2 xoo          
1   1   1 xxx
         
1   1   2 xxo
2   2   2 xxx W
1   1   2 xxo    
2   1   1 xoo
             
1   1   2 xxo         
2   1   1 xoo L
1   2   1 xox L         

1   2   2 xoo    
1   2   1 xox W
2   2   2 xxx
      
2   1   1 xoo
1   2   1 xox W
1   1   1 xxx
      
2   2   1 xxo            
1   1   1 xxx W
2   1   1 xoo
   
1   1   1 xxx      
1   2   2 xoo L   
2   1   2 xox L   
   
1   1   1 xxx      
1   1   2 xxo W   
1   1   2 xxo
1   1   1 xxx
2   2   1 xxo    
2   1   2 xox
         
1   2   1 xox
2   1   1 xoo W
1   1   2 xxo

2   2   2 xxx
2   2   1 xxo W
1   2   2 xoo

2   2   1 xxo
1   2   1 xox L
1   2   1 xox W

1   2   1 xox
1   1   2 xxo L
1   2   1 xox W

2   2   1 xxo
1   2   2 xoo L
2   1   2 xox L

1   1   1 xxx
1   1   1 xxx W
2   1   1 xoo

2   1   1 xoo
1   2   2 xoo W
1   2   1 xox
2   2   1 xxo

1   2   2 xoo
2   2   2 xxx L
2   2   1 xxo L

1   2   1 xox
1   2   1 xox W
2   2   1 xxo

1   1   1 xxx
2   2   1 xxo W
2   1   2 xox

1   1   1 xxx
1   2   1 xox L
1   1   1 xxx W

2   2   2 xxx
2   1   1 xoo L
1   2   2 xoo W

2   2   2 xxx
2   2   2 xxx W
2   1   2 xox

2   1   2 xox
1   1   1 xxx L
1   2   1 xox W

1   2   2 xoo
1   1   1 xxx L
2   1   2 xox L

1   1   1 xxx
2   2   1 xxo W
2   1   1 xoo

1   1   2 xxo
2   1   2 xox L
1   2   1 xox W

2   2   2 xxx
1   2   1 xox L
1   1   1 xxx W

1   1   1 xxx
1   1   2 xxo W
2   1   1 oxx

1   2   2 oxx
2   1   1 xoo W
1   2   1 xox
2   2   1 xxo

2   2   1 xxo
1   2   1 xox L
1   1   2 xxo W

2   1   2 xox
1   2   2 xoo W
1   2   1 xox
1   2   2 xoo
2   2   2 xxx
Denial of gamblers fallacy is usually seen in people who has Roulette as last option for a way to wealth, debt covering and a independent lifestyle.  Next step is pretty ugly-
AP - It's not that it can't be done, but rather people don't really have a clue as to the level of fanaticism and outright obsession that it takes to be successful, let alone get to the level where you can take money out of the casinos on a regular basis. Out of 1,000 people that earnestly try, maybe only one will make it.

ego

#4
Nov 17, 04:02 AM 2010
I will run one simulation and using a fibo progression in four to five levels.
It would worka as a step-letter where you increase your bets to recover the two last lost bets and at any level above the first one is to gain +1 or break even and move down to first level again - this way you create a delay and can play for a long period of time before it fails or tank.

Note.
I know it will fail and the house edge will take it all down to zero and beyound - i only do this as i enjoy it to be fun.
Denial of gamblers fallacy is usually seen in people who has Roulette as last option for a way to wealth, debt covering and a independent lifestyle.  Next step is pretty ugly-
AP - It's not that it can't be done, but rather people don't really have a clue as to the level of fanaticism and outright obsession that it takes to be successful, let alone get to the level where you can take money out of the casinos on a regular basis. Out of 1,000 people that earnestly try, maybe only one will make it.

VLS

#5
Nov 18, 12:55 AM 2010
Quote from: ego on Nov 17, 04:02 AM 2010
I will run one simulation and using a fibo progression in four to five levels.

Looking forward to seeing your results :)

Thanks for participating of the forum  :thumbsup:
🡆 ROULETTEIDEAS․COM, home of the RIBOT WEB software, featuring FREE modules for the community! ✔️

ego

#6
Nov 18, 07:32 AM 2010
Quote from: VLS on Nov 18, 12:55 AM 2010
Looking forward to seeing your results :)

Thanks for participating of the forum  :thumbsup:

The simulation works great - 1 units itch visit with no worrys - I assume if some one would like dinner or two drinks for free they could use this as its not so risky.

If you have a dice with four sides how many times in the row for itch cycel will it show 3 out of four sides up front - I have no clue hehehe

One other way is to wait until two groups of three formations goes to sleep and 6 sides of a dice with 8 sides had a show and play six times in a row 1 1 3 4 7 11.

If 121 and 112 is the sleeping ones you just play First 2 if 1 then no bet then if 2 then 2 and if it was 1 then 1 wich is a total of two bets against does two formations.
Different cominations give different canceleation.

Cheers
Denial of gamblers fallacy is usually seen in people who has Roulette as last option for a way to wealth, debt covering and a independent lifestyle.  Next step is pretty ugly-
AP - It's not that it can't be done, but rather people don't really have a clue as to the level of fanaticism and outright obsession that it takes to be successful, let alone get to the level where you can take money out of the casinos on a regular basis. Out of 1,000 people that earnestly try, maybe only one will make it.

albertojonas

#7
Jun 03, 08:38 PM 2011
[reveal]PPP   xxx      
PPP   xxx   w   1
BPP   xoo   l   -1
PPB   xxo   w   1
BPP   xoo   l   -1
PPP   xxx   l   -1
BPP    xoo   w   3
PBP   xox   w   1
PPP   xxx   l   -1
BPP    xoo   l   -1
PPP   xxx   w   3
BPP   xoo   l   -1
PPP    xxx   w   1
BPP   xoo   l   -1
BPB   xox   l   -1
PPB    xxo   l   -3
BPB   xox   w   4
BPP   xoo   w   3
BBB    xxx   l   -1
         5
[reveal]xxx         
x0x   l   -1   
xx0   l   -1   -2
xx0   w   3   1
xx0   w   1   2
xxx   w   1   3
xx0   w   1   4
x00   l   -1   -3
xxx   l   -1   -2
x0x   l   -3   -5
xx0   l   -4   -9
x00   l   -7   -16
xx0   w   11   -5
xx0   w   7   2
x00   l   -4   -2
x00   w   7   5
x0x   w   1   6
xxx   l   -1   5
xox   w   1   6[/reveal]
;)

or even waiting for the cycle to end

[reveal]
PPP   xxx   
PPP   xxx   w
BPP   xoo   
PPB   xxo   
BPP   xoo   
PPP   xxx   
BPP    xoo   
PBP   xox   c
PPP   xxx   
BPP    xoo   l
PPP   xxx   w
BPP   xoo   w
PPP    xxx   
BPP   xoo   
BPB   xox   
PPB    xxo   c
BPB   xox   
BPP   xoo   w
BBB    xxx   [/reveal]

albertojonas

#8
Jun 05, 08:36 PM 2011
after 2 losses why do not play against 4th pattern to appear?
???

albertojonas

#9
Jun 07, 01:29 AM 2011
Here are 2 sessions of 100 "mini-games" each -300 spins each session

played after LL

regression 7-3-1 :stop after any break in decision (LL or LW) then restart after LL again.

numbers are provided from random.org

so far the results are incredible. at least comparable with the use of a fibonacci progression 1-2-3-5-8-13...
==================================

I find strange that no one digs more into this.

this is a step ahead playing EC bets....
O0

albertojonas

#10
Jun 07, 01:32 AM 2011
Quote from: ego on Nov 17, 03:58 AM 2010
Waves would be three new events out of four with out any repeat if we would isolate it into two bets.
example = WWLLWWWLLWWWLWLWLLWWLLWWLWLWWLWLLWLWLWWWLWW
That is 300 trails with a very even distribution - but nothing is due to happen.
At least some one use a dice with four sides and a wave or capturing repeats wich appers when there is imbalance wich is constant present.
[reveal]
2   1   2 xox               
2   1   2 xox W
1   2   1 xox          
1   2   2 xoo          
1   1   1 xxx
         
1   1   2 xxo
2   2   2 xxx W
1   1   2 xxo    
2   1   1 xoo
             
1   1   2 xxo         
2   1   1 xoo L
1   2   1 xox L         

1   2   2 xoo    
1   2   1 xox W
2   2   2 xxx
      
2   1   1 xoo
1   2   1 xox W
1   1   1 xxx
      
2   2   1 xxo            
1   1   1 xxx W
2   1   1 xoo
   
1   1   1 xxx      
1   2   2 xoo L   
2   1   2 xox L   
   
1   1   1 xxx      
1   1   2 xxo W   
1   1   2 xxo
1   1   1 xxx
2   2   1 xxo    
2   1   2 xox
         
1   2   1 xox
2   1   1 xoo W
1   1   2 xxo

2   2   2 xxx
2   2   1 xxo W
1   2   2 xoo

2   2   1 xxo
1   2   1 xox L
1   2   1 xox W

1   2   1 xox
1   1   2 xxo L
1   2   1 xox W

2   2   1 xxo
1   2   2 xoo L
2   1   2 xox L

1   1   1 xxx
1   1   1 xxx W
2   1   1 xoo

2   1   1 xoo
1   2   2 xoo W
1   2   1 xox
2   2   1 xxo

1   2   2 xoo
2   2   2 xxx L
2   2   1 xxo L

1   2   1 xox
1   2   1 xox W
2   2   1 xxo

1   1   1 xxx
2   2   1 xxo W
2   1   2 xox

1   1   1 xxx
1   2   1 xox L
1   1   1 xxx W

2   2   2 xxx
2   1   1 xoo L
1   2   2 xoo W

2   2   2 xxx
2   2   2 xxx W
2   1   2 xox

2   1   2 xox
1   1   1 xxx L
1   2   1 xox W

1   2   2 xoo
1   1   1 xxx L
2   1   2 xox L

1   1   1 xxx
2   2   1 xxo W
2   1   1 xoo

1   1   2 xxo
2   1   2 xox L
1   2   1 xox W

2   2   2 xxx
1   2   1 xox L
1   1   1 xxx W

1   1   1 xxx
1   1   2 xxo W
2   1   1 oxx

1   2   2 oxx
2   1   1 xoo W
1   2   1 xox
2   2   1 xxo

2   2   1 xxo
1   2   1 xox L
1   1   2 xxo W

2   1   2 xox
1   2   2 xoo W
1   2   1 xox
1   2   2 xoo
2   2   2 xxx
[/reveal]

the above session would have resulted in a profit of +47units if played with regression 7-3-1
:D
-
Print
Go Up Pages1
User actions