A system from a member in VLS

[Jordan]

Who wants to be a Pro Roulette player?
The answer is easy! But do you have the right skills to do it?

1) Patience
2) Discipline

If you think that you have them, then here is the only mathematical method that is a winner in the long term.
You should also think of this:
"Is this the kind of JOB that I would like to do? Or is this the kind of JOB that fits in my character?"

But 1st of all please let me educate some new and old members in here:  (it is important for all of you to read it)

1) No system can win by playing every single spin. (You simply can not find any merit in that)
2) Any system that includes a winning target is NOT a winning system. Because IF a system is a long term winner "the more you play it, the more money you will be making".
3) No system that includes a progression can be a long term winner.(because if you will face a bad sequence of betting you will not be able to recover)
4) Every spin is independent but overall and in the majority of the game(this is what we need, the majority in order to win more than we lose)after some occasions/results, some GROUPS of spins have a better advantage because of the probability/way of the randomness of the game.
5)If and when a system is a long term winner ,it MUST have a reason why it wins. Without any genuine reason ,you just play with the famous disadvantage of the game -2.7.
Roulette is a mathematical/probability game. So the advantage/reason should come also from the maths/probability of the game.

The method:

In every Casino we can find plenty of wheels.
Every wheel has a board with the last 12 results (at least)

The method is only on ECs
So we are searching for this sequence:  (The given example is with the Reds and Blacks. We do the same with the other 2 ECs)

IN THE LAST 12 NUMBERS WE MUST HAVE:  4(or less) Reds and 8(or more) Blacks. (Or opposite)

When we are having this sequence, then for the next 10 spins we are FLAT betting on the colour that has the less hits (in the eg.. above we would bet the RED)

We don t care if we are +1 or +2 or ââ,¬â€œ 5 in any stage of the bettingââ,¬Â¦WE ARE JUST BETTING 10 SPINS of the SAME.
No stop win ,NO stop lossââ,¬Â¦.the stop is being defined by the end of the 10 betting spins.

There you go! You are all Roulette Pros now!

Do you have the discipline and patience needed to run around the tables to find these sequences?Do you have the desciplin to not gamble(by betting something else than ur system)?Then go and make some money.
Are you greedy? who cares? If you are its a good thing. because now you are playing with a long term winner.

Band Roll needed =40 chips.

Ps.Do you have the patience to suffer some times from the UPs and DOWNS in some visits?

Even with the this winning method 1 in 100 will aplly it CORECTLY and make money.
Because the other 99 want a system that makes 100 chips in 2 spins

I WILL NOT POST IN THIS TOPIC AGAIN.YOU HAVE IT ALL.

[Kattila]

Ok, thanks Jordan.
This can be tested with RX, because have clear rules.
Maybe someone who have the RX program will test this .

[Fripper]

Ye some testing in RX would be nice, I have some hope in this one.  Or with some tweaks.

[Steve Morgan]

I can see some merit in this approach but I'll reserve final judgement until I've had a chance to check out with some pre-recorded spins I have.  All takes time but I think this may be a worth a look.  Thanks for posting
Steve M

[albalaha]

I think it can work better with RNG than Live one and needs progressions too.

[Jordan]

rng and live wheels are the same because its alllllllll random(exept if we have a cheat)

and progressions will not work in this or in any system.

[F_LAT_INO]

You can't escape his mayesty-zero-
Lasciate ogni esperanca voi che entrate.

[albalaha]

Exactly, zero would suck this game.

[Boo_Ray]

,it MUST have a reason why it wins. 

I cant see a reason in this sistem. . . .  and also I tested it. . .  after just 1000 spins it was down -47 and ofcourse not 1000betting spins. . .  it was once up +4 at spin 188. . . .

I dont know how you come up with that idea but 12number window will never give you any statistical advantage(if you are aiming for that). .

[albalaha]

Dear Jordon,
                      with due respect I say this system of whoever is just not workable in practical situations in its present form. give it  a try yourself and you would know this. May be some alterations required. Please check the systems efficiency yourself before posting it to avoid criticism. No system can be 100% safe but it should be positive.

[Jordan]

I just saw a system that made impression to me and I posted it.

If anyone likes it, he can use it.

[VLS]

Hello Guys, I just had to edit some parts of this thread as they were getting off-topic.

Please feel free to continue with the proper debate regarding this system.

Thanks.