Beating the even money

[atlantis]

Hee Hee! Simple system for betting LAST 2 'pair' results: 1-2, 1-1, 2-1 and 2-2 to repeat in exactly the same order.
I use 10 sessions of winner's past results posted earlier.

1
2
1 w
1 L
1 w
1 w
2 L
2 L
2 w
2 w
2 w
1 L
2 w
1 w
2 w
1 w
2 w
1 w  = +8


2
1
2 w
1 w
2 w
2 L
2 w
1 L
2 w
0==
1 w
2 w
1 w
2 w
1 w
2 w
2 L
2 w
0==
1 L   = +7 (half-stake returns on 0's)


1
2
1 w
2 w
0==
1 w
2 w
1 w
2 w
1 L
1 L
1 w
0==
1 w
2 L
2 L
1 L
2 w
1 w
0==
1 L = +2.5 (half-stake returns on 0's)


2
1
1 L
1 w
2 L
2 L
2 w
2 w
2 w
2 w
2 w
2 w
2 w
1 L
1 L
2 L
2 L
1 L  = +0

2
2
2 w
1 L
1 L
2 L
1 w
2 w
2 L
2 w
1 L
1 L
1 w
1 w
1 w
2 L
2 L
1 L  = -2

1
2
2 L
1 L
2 w
2 w
2 w
1 L
0==
2 w
1 w
1 L
2 L
1 w
1 L
0 L
2 L
2 L
1 L
2 w  = -3.5  (half-stake returns on 0's)




1
1
2 L
1 w
2 w
1 w
1 L
2 L
2 L
1 L
1 L
1 w
1 w
2 L
1 w
1 L
1 w
2 w = +0

2
1
1 L
1 w
1 w
1 w
1 w
2 L
1 w
2 w
2 L
2 w
1 L
2 w
2 L
1 L
1 L
1 w   = +2
 

2
1
2 w
2 L
2 w
0==
2 w
0==
1 L
2 w
1 w
1 L
2 L
1 w
1 L
0==
1 w
2 L
1 w
1 L
2 L  = -1.5 (half-stake returns on 0's)


2
2
1 L
1 L
1 w
1 w
1 w
1 w
2 L
2 L
2 w
2 w
0==
2 w
1 L
2 w
2 L
1 L
2 w  = +1.5 (half-stake returns on 0's)

TOTAL = +14 (flatbetting)

Probably just luck...? Still I showed it to win!

A.

[The General]

21212221201212122201=11+2
121201212111012212101=7-7 progression needed
211122222222211221=12+6
+15 with appropriate switches and progression
I won’t be posting anymore results.
So just keep at boys you’ll get it .
Maybe I’ll write a book from  the last 20 years .anyways it’s been nice to share this with you all.
Good luck o ya you don’t need it with this.

Winner,

Where's the proof of concept?  What are the logical reasons that it should work?  The math?

By the way, a progression can't turn a losing system into a winning system in the long run.

[atlantis]

Hee Hee! Simple system for betting LAST 2 'pair' results: 1-2, 1-1, 2-1 and 2-2 to repeat in exactly the same order.
I use 10 sessions of winner's past results posted earlier.

Oops- I complicate rules unnecessarily!
Results obtained by simply betting for penultimate 'pair result' to occur (last but one pair result)
- - In which case maybe use target and progression from "10 days in Monte Carlo" book pdf?

[Winner]

Winner,

Where's the proof of concept?  What are the logical reasons that it should work?  The math?

By the way, a progression can't turn a losing system into a winning system in the long run.

Who says

[Winner]

General Show me the math cause last I check your kind of play still pays 35 to 1

[The General]

Who says

Mathematicians like Dr. Edward Thorp.

[atlantis]

Ol' Teddy Thorpe's book:

link:s://:.bookyards.com/en/book/details/16582/The-Mathematics-Of-Gambling

[Winner]

Mathematicians like Dr. Edward Thorp.

It’s called countermeasures. I ve see what happens to card counters and it’s illegal to where concealed devices. I have a roulette computer and my sytem is easier anyone can use it you don’t have to be a MIT 🤓
1+1 =2 for me I think I no math

[Winner]

Mathematicians like Dr. Edward Thorp.

Hers my math
12210121111202112121-7 profit +2
21112201212211212222=0 profit +6
1122112212122122211+2
112122220121120011121-4
2112211202221111111. -6 profit +4
221222122221211111 +0 profit +6
112122212221121111 +0 profit +1
21121212121212111111-5 +1
1211101212122122121-2 profit +5
Total +27 I didn’t even break a 😓 that’s  my math

[buffalowizard]

With all due respect "winner" , his point is valid because anyone can post endless winning sessions without giving the full system. These roulette forums have been full of semi systems that promise so much but are never fully discovered (see 120+ pages of Vaddi etc)
That's the kicker. As soon as the cat is out the bag, it'll be tested and run through thousands of spins until it loses , you know this - but you shouldn't see this as a dent to your reputation. 
Issue is this, you wont tell anyone if they finally "get it". So the whole excerise is one big merry go round

[Winner]

Any ways I’m not really interested in what u have to say Mr General go and win your way and I’ll win mine

[Winner]

With all due respect "winner" , his point is valid because anyone can post endless winning sessions without giving the full system. These roulette forums have been full of semi systems that promise so much but are never fully discovered (see 120+ pages of Vaddi etc)
That's the kicker. As soon as the cat is out the bag, it'll be tested and run through thousands of spins until it loses , you know this - but you shouldn't see this as a dent to your reputation. 
Issue is this, you wont tell anyone if they finally "get it". So the whole excerise is one big merry go round

Merry go round  don’t no about that
You have a bet selection
You have progression and all the switches
Sorry if you can’t manage to put a winning bet together it’s all there .

[atlantis]

12210121111202112121-7 profit +2

Can anyone tell me how he gets +2 even using his progression 1-1-1-2-4-8-16-32-64. Struggling to understand...

A.

[buffalowizard]

12210121111202112121-7 profit +2

Can anyone tell me how he gets +2 even using his progression 1-1-1-2-4-8-16-32-64. Struggling to understand...

A.

No one knows exactly how he plays and he aint tellin' , so it's fruitless.

[Mako]

The "Magic 30©" are an illusive bunch...they are hidden in the shadows, yet fully exposed under in sun simultaneously....

We'll get there.  It will take time, and thread bumps, and many eyes smarter than the two eyes typing this post to nail them down, but I do feel Winner has given enough examples that we can break it down eventually.

Rome wasn't built in a day.  All we can do is enjoy the journey, try looking at it from various angles.