Beating the even money

[Let Me Win]

link:s://archive.org/details/TenDaysAtMonteCarloAtTheBankSEx

[atlantis]

Regarding Gr8 players prog:
LEVEL 1:  âˆ'1, 1, 1,âˆ'1, âˆ'1,âˆ'1.âˆ'1        âˆ'3 up next LEVEL
LEVEL 2:  2, âˆ'2, âˆ'2, âˆ'2, 2, 2, âˆ'2       âˆ'2 up next LEVEL
LEVEL 3:  3, âˆ'3. âˆ'3, 3.âˆ'3,âˆ'3,âˆ'3       âˆ'9  up next LEVEL what we do here? Go back to LEVEL 2 or continue?
LEVEL 4:  4, 4. 4 what we do here? Go back 2  LEVELS (start from  LEVEL2)? Or 1 back, start from LEVEL 3?

Here is how I might play your results, Loukoumas, using that progression:

-1; 1  = +0 level so restart level 1
1        =+1 new high so restart level 1
-1; -1; -1; -1; 1; -1; -1  = -4  in minus so up to 2u
-2; 2; 2; -2; 2; -2; -2    = -6  still in minus so up to 3u
3; -3; -3; -3; 3; 3; 3     = -3  improved so back down to 2u for next 7 bets

In the book LetMeWin showed each Level can have 10 bets or stages...

A.

[boyd30]

As GLC showed best with not so high stake I continued the test. It is played the most dominant last 7. Must be thousands of numbers that Mr Eko provided. Well, a bit on the way at least.

[ice789]

As GLC showed best with not so high stake I continued the test. It is played the most dominant last 7. Must be thousands of numbers that Mr Eko provided. Well, a bit on the way at least.

pls share code drsgon ts2

[boyd30]

pls share code drsgon ts2

I can't code. I'm doing it by hand.

[loukoumas]

-1; 1  = +0 level so restart level 1
1        =+1 new high so restart level 1
-1; -1; -1; -1; 1; -1; -1  = -4  in minus so up to 2u
Correct, but according GLC we havent to think for a level within a level, so we just track for at least -1 1st level  total to move up to next level.
-2; 2; 2; -2; 2; -2; -2 ?   
3; -3; -3; -3; 3; 3; 3.?   Those are different from my example.
Anyway i write what i think should be right according this old post:
LEVEL 1:  âˆ'1, 1, 1,âˆ'1, âˆ'1,âˆ'1.âˆ'1        âˆ'3 up next LEVEL
LEVEL 2:  2, âˆ'2, âˆ'2, âˆ'2, 2, 2, âˆ'2       âˆ'2 up next LEVEL
LEVEL 3:  3 (return to level 2 since we are +1plus, GLC is clear at this point,  meaning that in any stage of a level we are +1plus we have to go back to previous level)
LEVEL 2:âˆ'2,âˆ'2, 2,âˆ'2,âˆ'2,âˆ'2, 2 (instead of 4 from my example) âˆ'6 up next LEVEL
LEVEL 3: +3,+3 (if  next +3 again we have to go back at LEVEL 1 though, we always seek to return at "ville"1).
Note that is different approach  from cyclic 5 progression
11111
22222
33333
44444
55555
where always have to complete all 5 stages of a level.

[atlantis]

Regarding Gr8 players prog:
LEVEL 1:  âˆ'1, 1, 1,âˆ'1, âˆ'1,âˆ'1.âˆ'1        âˆ'3 up next LEVEL
LEVEL 2:  2, âˆ'2, âˆ'2, âˆ'2, 2, 2, âˆ'2       âˆ'2 up next LEVEL
LEVEL 3:  3, âˆ'3. âˆ'3, 3.âˆ'3,âˆ'3,âˆ'3       âˆ'9  up next LEVEL what we do here? Go back to LEVEL 2 or continue?
LEVEL 4:  4, 4. 4 what we do here? Go back 2  LEVELS (start from  LEVEL2)? Or 1 back, start from LEVEL 3?

At the end of Level 2 you have got -2 - but it should be -5
At the end of Level 3 you would be -14 overall

A.

[-Katalyst-]

Must be thousands of numbers that Mr Eko provided. Well, a bit on the way at least.

**14605 sets
- so prbly around 28500 numbers (0s inclusive)

@ Jono - the dominant 3 mechanically doesn’t hold up, having said that - there’s still money to be made with this set up - I guess that’s where intuit & experience also comes into play

-Best-

[loukoumas]

  We say same thing Atlantis, I just make the addition separately for each level.You add the total sum.

[atlantis]

  We say same thing Atlantis, I just make the addition separately for each level.You add the total sum.

Yes you are right!
All I'm saying is that at the end of level 3 you are -14
If u check the way I do it using your wins and losses it is only -3 at the end of level 3!

Agree that main idea is to try and keep as long as possible in "1-ville".

Regards,
A.

[atlantis]

Hi Loukoumas,

You w/l register  = LWWLLLLWLLLWWLWLLWLLLWWW

-1; 1  = +0 level so restart level 1
1        =+1 new high so restart level 1
-1; -1; -1; -1; 1; -1; -1  = -4  in minus so up to 2u
-2; 2; 2; -2; 2; -2; -2    = -6  still in minus so up to 3u
3; -3; -3; -3; 3; 3; 3     = -3  improved so back down to 2u for next 7 bets

LW
W
LLLLWLL
LWWLWLL
WLLLWWW

A.

[loukoumas]

Yes , right, just now your approach flashed into my mind!
So you propose a slight modification to GLCs only for level1. IF we reach +1plus within 1st level we track the level back from the start and we do it until conscecutive loses  lead us to step up.Clever!

[boyd30]

**14605 sets
- so prbly around 28500 numbers (0s inclusive)

@ Jono - the dominant 3 mechanically doesn’t hold up, having said that - there’s still money to be made with this set up - I guess that’s where intuit & experience also comes into play

-Best-

28500 numbers! So if I count it right I have passed 500 spins ( as there is no need to type down every number on RX).

[jono1167]

**14605 sets
- so prbly around 28500 numbers (0s inclusive)

@ Jono - the dominant 3 mechanically doesn’t hold up, having said that - there’s still money to be made with this set up - I guess that’s where intuit & experience also comes into play

-Best-

All good Katalyst. I’m going to test some of the other methods but with different progressions.

[Mister Eko]

Toughest session yet..... see results below....

2,2,2 - 1,1,1  LLL  (+40) -7 fb
2,2,2 - 2  W  (+44) -6 fb
2,1,2 - 0,1,2  LLW  (+42) -7 fb
1,0,1 - 1  W  (+46) -6 fb
1,1,2 - 1  W  (+47) -5 fb
2,1,2 - 1,1,1  LLL  (+41) -8 fb
2,2,1 - 1,1,2  LLW  (+38) -8 fb
1,1,2 - 1   W  (+43) -7 fb
1,2,1 - 2,2,1  LLW   (+40) -8 fb 
1,2,2 - 1,1,1  LLL  (+22) -11 fb
1,1,1 - 2,2,1  LLW  (+15) -12 fb
2,2,2 - 1,2  LW  (+16) -13 fb
1,1,2 -,2,2,2  LLL. (-14) -16 fb
1,1,1 - 1    W (-2) -15 fb
0,1,2,2 - 2  W (+9) -14 fb
1,2,0,1 - 1  W (+19) -13 fb
2,1,1 - 2,1  LW (+20) -13 fb
2,1,1 - 2,1  LW (+21) -13 fb
1,1,0,0,1 - 1  W (+30) -12 fb
1,1,1 - 1  W  (+38) -11 fb
0,1,1,2 - 2,2,1  LLW (+32) -14 fb
1,1,1 - 2,2,1  LLW  (+25) -15 fb
2,2,2 - 2  W (34) -14 fb
1,1,2 - 2,1  LW (+26) -14 fb
2,2,1 - 1,1,2  LLW (+29) -15 fb
2,1,2 - 1,1,2  LLW (+21) -16 fb
1,1,2 - 1  W (+31) -15 fb
1,1,1 - 2,1  LW  (+30) -15 fb       
2,1,0,1 - 2,2,2  LLL  (+0) -18 fb
2,2,2 - 1,2  LW (+1) -18 fb
2,2,2 - 1,1,1  LLL. (-40) -21 fb
1,1,1 - 1  W. (-25) -20 fb
1,1,2 - 2,2,1  LLW  (-28) -21 fb
0,1,1,2 - 1  W  (-13) -20 fb
1,1,2 - 2,1  LW (-12) -20 fb
0,1,2,1 - 0,1  LW (-11) -20 fb
1,1,1 - 1  W (+3) -19 fb
1,1,1 - 2,2,1  LLW (-9) -20 fb
2,2,2 - 1,2  LW (-8) -20 fb
1,1,1 - 1  W  (+6) -19 fb
1,2,2 - 1,1,1  LLL. (-36) -22 fb
1,1,1 - 1  W (-20) -21 fb
1,1,2 - 1  W (-5) -20 fb
2,2,1 - 2  W (+9) -19 fb
1,2,1 - 1  W (+22) -18 fb
1,1,1 - 2,1  LW (+23) -18 fb
2,1,1 - 1  W (+35) -17 fb
2,2,2 - 2 W  (+46) -16 fb
2,1,1 - 2,2,2   LLL (+40) -19 fb
2,2,2 - 1,1,2  LLW (+37) -20 fb
1,2,2 - 1,2  LW  (+38) -20 fb
2,1,1 - 2,1  LW (+39) -20 fb
1,1,1 - 2,1  LW (+40) -20 fb
1,1,2 - 1  W (+45) -19 fb
1,1,2 - 0,1  LW (+46) -18 fb
1,2,2 - 2  W (+50) -17 fb
1,1,1 - 1   W  (+53) -16 fb
2,2,1 - 1 W (+55) -15 fb

Total profit: +55 units (This session +9)
Flat bet -15 (This session -11).

I won’t be able to salvage the flat-bet but that’s ok.... I plan to use a conservative progression.

No more testing the ‘Dominant 3’. I’m happy the system has proved itself against a tough set of numbers.

I’m now going to test some of the other systems against Mr Eko’s numbers.
😊

Jono, I said I have incredible hard numbers. 99% of systems will fail on this.

Anyway, I worked on my against, and same switching method. I not revealed yet now, because not was the best results, but I kept to work on this, amd I think I found a way that kept me to positive after thousands of numbers. Even this is very very small numbers, an maybe the next 2000 numbers will lose more.

I wanna go thorough all my numbers, whick killed the dominant 3 method too, killed the Atlantis best of five, and now killing GLC method too.

Please guys, downllad my numbers, and try to discover something against them ! 

Cheers
Eko