Beating the even money

[jono1167]

Jono, I said I have incredible hard numbers. 99% of systems will fail on this.

Anyway, I worked on my against, and same switching method. I not revealed yet now, because not was the best results, but I kept to work on this, amd I think I found a way that kept me to positive after thousands of numbers. Even this is very very small numbers, an maybe the next 2000 numbers will lose more.

I wanna go thorough all my numbers, whick killed the dominant 3 method too, killed the Atlantis best of five, and now killing GLC method too.

Please guys, downllad my numbers, and try to discover something against them ! 

Cheers
Eko

All good Mister Eko. I would rather test myself against difficult numbers.

Still testing different methods... 😊

[Andre Chass]

I believe the best way to improve the strategy is to avoid betting the dominants
2-2-2 and 1-1-1

What do you think, guys?

[jono1167]

I believe the best way to improve the strategy is to avoid betting the dominants
2-2-2 and 1-1-1

What do you think, guys?

I think it sounds like a good idea. Give it a go Andre.

I’ve just started testing a switching method. It’s probably similar to what Mister Eko is doing...

[loukoumas]

I have been searching and found the original gr8 players post mentioned by GLC here link:s://betselection.cc/profile/gr8player/?area=showposts;start=75.
There are some hints i want to point out after reading carefully this post about his 7 step progression:
a) We pick up randomly any 7 spins to build up our 1st level ("1-villle"). Dont need to look for a new high within  it, cause this will make things unecessarily complicated. We sit at this level either on a plus or 1 unit minus at most (4-3 loss series, we move onto next level only when  -3 ,-5 or -7 occur ). IMPORTANT: We do the same with anyone stepping level eg. if we finish level 2 and we are -2 units behind (in total with level1) we stay at level 2, if we finish level 3 with -3 in total we stay also at level 3 and so on. On the contrary  if we are behind -3 units or more after we have finished level 2 we move up to level 3, at level 3  when behind -4 or more move up level 4 etc.
b) Always we seek to return to level 1, in order to keep progression as lower as possible. At this point comes the debatable part, unfortunately not cleared from gr8 player: Assuming we start level 2 with +2 units after -3 loss on level1, hence we are -1. What do we do here?  We return to level 1? (in this case -1loss must be considered the first spin in a series of a new "1-villle", so we have to track for  another 6 spins to complete it. Or we continue on level 2 until a total plus (or minus over -1units)? First choice is more safe but also more complicated than second. Why? If we start level 3 with +3 after -5 loss from previous level we are 2 units down, so we have to step back to level 2 and start over tracking for another 6 spins of 2 units and so on. However if  we start level 3 with +3 after -4 loss from previous level we are 1 unit down, therefore we have to step back to level1and start over tracking for another 6 spins of 1 unit this time. Picking to go with the second choice instead, we just seek for a plus in total to step back (not as many forths and backs), but progression may escalate a little more larger. Feel free to comment.

[atlantis]

Hi Loukoumas,

We are not tied to operate it exactly like gr8player suggests. I take your point about the further clarity which would have been helpful though. I think it a matter of personal choice in the end how one operates it. It is quite evident that there is some room for flexibility as it is described. I have already set out my own take on it - it is basically the more cautious approach that you have alluded to.  I am comfortable with that and it suits me personally. Up to others if they wish to have fewer steps or make it more aggressive.
But I think you are quite right to further question and seek clarity on this. It is most important to know how to operate a system properly each time and to react correctly in each eventuality that occurs during play  One needs to be absolutely certain and confident about such matters when practicing in order to get valid and meaningful results. If enough trial results are favourable and positive only then can one think about going on to play in real casino and prepare to risk any real monies.
A.

[Winner]

Worm guard results
W:lwllll:wllwlwll:wwllwllwlllwlwlllll:wlllwlwlwwl:lwlwwlwlwl:lllwllwllwwllwwllllwlllwwlwlwlwwlwwllwllwlll::l:wwllwl.

[Still]

Worm guard results
W:lwllll:wllwlwll:wwllwllwlllwlwlllll:wlllwlwlwwl:lwlwwlwlwl:lllwllwllwwllwwllllwlllwwlwlwlwwlwwllwllwlll::l:wwllwl.

Can you point again to the systems you studied that eventually gave you the idea for this?

Which do you think is the most valid, detailed, system proposed so far in this thread?

[Winner]

Can you point again to the systems you studied that eventually gave you the idea for this?

Which do you think is the most valid, detailed, system proposed so far in this thread?
[/quote I will not very one needs to bupuy Andrew baccarat no lose / wait all day for a trigger systems ..
This thread is call beat the even money bet under the testing thread.if any one wants holy grails need to contact mr Grasshopper Andrew he has the way.😂

[Winner]

I believe the best way to improve the strategy is to avoid betting the dominants
2-2-2 and 1-1-1

What do you think, guys?

😂 ok

[Still]

I will not very one needs to bupuy Andrew baccarat no lose / wait all day for a trigger systems ..
This thread is call beat the even money bet under the testing thread.if any one wants holy grails need to contact mr Grasshopper Andrew he has the way.😂

Can i ask, when did you discover your first system that stayed above water (in profit)? 

How long did you develop other, profitable systems, before landing on the Grasshopper Guard method you now use? 

[Andre Chass]

I believe the best way to improve the strategy is to avoid betting the dominants
2-2-2 and 1-1-1

What do you think, guys?

I know I cant beat roulette in the long term, but I like to test and create strategies. It's a hobby to keep my brain working and healthy.

I'm fine here. Good luck

[Roulettebeater]

I know I cant beat roulette in the long term, but I like to test and create strategies. It's a hobby to keep my brain working and healthy.

I'm fine here. Good luck

André

You can make fortune from roulette, all you need is smart brain, big nose and faith in the dealer !

[jono1167]

Worm guard results
W:lwllll:wllwlwll:wwllwllwlllwlwlllll:wlllwlwlwwl:lwlwwlwlwl:lllwllwllwwllwwllllwlllwwlwlwlwwlwwllwllwlll::l:wwllwl.

Great results Winner! That's a hell of a lot of W's.

I'm still testing with Mister Eko's numbers. It's been going well so I'm planning a trip to the B&M next weekend. Time to grow a pair and get serious...

This 'Worm Guard' has really got me guessing.... I should be perfectly happy with the methods I'm using because they appear to be  working. However any clues about 'Worm Guard' would be well received!

Cheers Winner - I'd say 'good luck' but I don't think you need it......

[Winner]

Wwlwwlwl:wlwll
Wllwllwwlllllwwlwlllww
Lllwlwwll:lwlllwwll
Wwl:wwlwlwlll:lll:
W:llllwl:llwlllwwlww
Lllwwlwll:lwlwl:lwllwllwlwllwlllw
Wlwwlwll:lwlwl:llll:lll:lwwl
Wwl:l:wwlwlwwlllwwl:llwllll:llwlwwlwlwlwlww

[Winner]

Wlwlwwlwlllwlll:llwwlwllw
Wwwll:wlwwllllwwlwwl::lllwwlwwlllw
L:wwllwllwlwwll:wlw.
+12 flat