Does random have limits?

[Steve]

Look, some of you guys are truly clueless. I don't care. I try to help sometimes but it isn't getting through.

[MoneyT101]

Look, some of you guys are truly clueless. I don't care. I try to help sometimes but it isn't getting through.

Yup your right i just wasted everyones time.  Had nothing better to do...

I made a mistake in my calculation

sorry to waste your time

dead end nothing to see here 

delete this topic please

[Firefox]

Why do I need a real casino?

I can play electronic wheel or rng

That’s how I know you don’t understand anything! 

... and that's how I know you don't understand how to get a real advantage. RNG and electronic wheels  cannot be beaten (except in the case of a poor RNG algorithm and very advanced study of the number  generation and seeding procedures).

There's no indication you are at that level. You've just told me you would bet 21 with an enhanced chance,  after a very short sequence  of 1s and 2s I gave. That's nothing more than fallacy level.

Only physical wheels and real life dealers can be beaten with any consistency.

There is no limit to random, nor are there any short term sequence patterns in random. When you are proved wrong, you simply throw your toys out of the pram. You can do better!

[MoneyT101]

 

Yup your right! I’m putting all my toys away as we speak.

Everyone give up roulette isn’t beatable with math.  I’m just crazy!  Everyone I mentioned as a mentor was also crazy!

Sorry for all the confusion!

Start playing vb it’s the only way to win

Good luck!

[MoneyT101]

Close this topic!! No point in speaking anymore about it.

I was wrong!

If you can delete it! Thank you

[Madi]

Close this topic!! No point in speaking anymore about it.

I was wrong!

If you can delete it! Thank you

If you cant defend your writing , dont write. We have seen your “sorry saying” couple of times before. We are not interested in losers sorry.

[MoneyT101]

If you cant defend your writing , dont write. We have seen your “sorry saying” couple of times before. We are not interested in losers sorry.

I’ve made my peace!  People like you deserve to continue being losers 

[redhot]

I would have made 2.25 units before the first 0

Redhot posted some spins and that was random and I beat it flatbet (1 loss, 2 wins all on 1 dozen)

Were you betting 0.75 units on the dozen?

Or was it 1 unit with 0.25 to cover the zero?

[MoneyT101]

Were you betting 0.75 units on the dozen?

Or was it 1 unit with 0.25 to cover the zero?

Check your pm

[The General]

Were you betting 0.75 units on the dozen?

Or was it 1 unit with 0.25 to cover the zero?

Hedging in roulette serves no purpose, yet the first bet new players make is to place one chip on each zero, and then a chip between the zero and double zero. 

[Madi]

I’ve made my peace!  People like you deserve to continue being losers 

Loser only look for peace. People like you r shameless . Say sorry and surrender . Again appear with the junk

[Madi]

Yup your right i just wasted everyones time.  Had nothing better to do...

I made a mistake in my calculation

sorry to waste your time

dead end nothing to see here 

delete this topic please

As u r accepting that , you cant calculate properly and wasting people time , i would say dont come up again with your junk.

[Herby]

there's no such thing as cycles in random numbers

First you have to define what you mean by the word "cycle in random numbers".
Then you can decide if such an object exists.

[MoneyT101]

First you have to define what you mean by the word "cycle in random numbers".
Then you can decide if such an object exists.

No such thing as cycles... don’t waste your time

[Firefox]

@Herby Good point. Well in this case, I would take it to mean regular, repeatable, predictable patterns of results over tens, thousands, or millions (or infinite numbers of spins in the case of true random numbers).

Such patterns, if identified, being an indicator of  numbers about to appear giving a greater probability of a result appearing than may be expected a priori or by chance alone, and thus being an aid to betting.

In the case of true random numbers, such cycles do not exist. That's one of the definitions of true random.

In the case of pseudo-random numbers such as a RNG algorithm from modulo arithmetic, such cycles may exist over a huge (but not infinite) number of spins. Whether such a cycle would be exploitable I don't know. Some claim to have done it, but I don't know enough about the subject to know how true that claim is.