Gambling Philosophy

[ignatus]

Yes, Agreed; "There are many "evolving" gamblers out there...99%, according to " losing is good" they are very evolved ,..." Because this is how we learn, this is our HUMAN Nature, "We learn from our mistakes",...There is *No* other way to learn how to play Roulette, to test ALL kinds of possibilities, and see what works, and what does Not work,....etc, This is how we learn, this is how we *Evolve* yes? There is *No* other way around it, this i may say is the *only* way how to learn "how to play/how to become a good/pro Roulette-player"....Yes. This is "Trial and Error", I've mentioned it many times before.....

Cheers 

All the Best, and wellwishings ~ignatus 2019 <3

[precogmiles]

Yes, Agreed; "There are many "evolving" gamblers out there...99%, according to " losing is good" they are very evolved ,..." Because this is how we learn, this is our HUMAN Nature, "We learn from our mistakes",...There is *No* other way to learn how to play Roulette, to test ALL kinds of possibilities, and see what works, and what does Not work,....etc, This is how we learn, this is how we *Evolve* yes? There is *No* other way around it, this i may say is the *only* way how to learn "how to play/how to become a good/pro Roulette-player"....Yes. This is "Trial and Error", I've mentioned it many times before.....

Cheers 

All the Best, and wellwishings ~ignatus 2019 <3

 

Ignatus, I appreciate your hard work and effort over the years.

I give you respect for putting in hours of work to show us that all systems fail in the long run.

You have proved that the best anyone can hope for is a quick 'smash and grab' if its their lucky day.

Which again makes me think why there are so many on this forum who still believe in systems?

even VB can not beat RNG.

The only way to truly beat roulette (RNG or B&M) is by precognition.

[Firefox]

Which again makes me think why there are so many on this forum who still believe in systems?

Because systems are within easier reach. One just bets certain amounts in certain ways and the profit comes rolling in. Except that it doesn't. There is no mathematical staking system, or staking system based on results which have just occurred which can gain an edge on the game.

Whereas other methods that may be able to get an edge are not available overnight. You can't just go out and play. It takes years of experience and study and practice to be able to implement them.

[Firefox]

Some further thoughts.

If it was possible to beat a random wheel with a staking system, it would have been done long ago. Just think of all the people trying and the massive computer power available over the last 40 years to try different approaches, even using the computer to try things automatically rather like a brute force chess algorithm. Either the game would have been withdrawn, or they would have fixed it by changing the conditions, had someone managed an exploit. Mathematics tells us it cant be beaten long term, but just in case you don't believe that, looking at the failure to find a winning strategy, despite the massive computer power available, would surely also be convincing.

In a sense the house changing the game conditions to thwart strategies has already happened by the setting of house min/max limits. The house realised a long time ago that the Martingale could beat the wheel in the short term by many gamblers taking hit and run profits before a long adverse run caused them ruin. Therefore they introduced min and max table limits to prevent doubling up more than 6 or 7 times and hastening the ruin of pundits playing these systems.

Moving on to the ways in which prediction can be used to alter the house edge, one can also conclude, that since players are free to use these methods for the most part, such methods must be very difficult to implement or else "everyone would be doing it" and again the game would be be withdrawn or altered. Certainly methods like VB or DS take a lot of knowledge and some precise timing abilities. I have tried teaching VB to a few friends and they can't get their heads round it. It's either the timing or the wheel spinning or the practice/dedication needed to learn and visualise the wheel and place the right bets quickly which beats them.

I know some friends who play "DS" but it's not the kind of DS I would recognise as being able to get an edge. They mark the card provided by the casino with where the ball is going from spin to spin, but they are not looking at cw/acw spins,  ball release points or ball release type, clocking exact rotor speeds, counting revs of the ball, looking at diamond falls offs and dominant drop zones, or looking at scatter patterns for similar results. When I try to talk to them about measuring and observing these things, their eyes glaze over. Its clear that all this is too much work or too difficult to understand. They are there to gamble and have fun, even if that means losing.

[Proofreaders2000]

Hate to see you go Ignatus 

It has been a pleasure. 

[Steve]

The only way to truly beat roulette (RNG or B&M) is by precognition.

Ive been saying for years, I think something along these lines is the HG (if there is such a thing).

There are multiple ways of beating roulette. It comes down to "increasing accuracy or predictions". How to do it depends on the mechanism that determines the winning number. For example, the wheel and ball. Or the RNG algorithms. NOT crap like "repeaters" or changing the size of your bets.

The reason you havent succeeded to this point Ignatus is because you didnt focus on cause and effect. The winning number is not determined by hot numbers and related things.

There are cases where previous numbers can give clues to future numbers... but not in the way almost every system player thinks.

[nottophammer]

Ig
is this what Saint said to you.
"Focus on predicting wheel sectors where the ball is expected to land" ~Steve

Expected

[Firefox]

Expectation - mathematical term. Optimal expectation = more likely.

[Steve]

Notto are you really that stupid?

Yes, you need to increase the accuracy of predictions. Why? Because if you don't, the payouts will always be lower than the odds.

Would you please, pretty please, switch your brain to the ON position.

Does it need to be wheel sectors? No. There are numerous ways to improve odds. Like I said, it depends on the mechanism that determines winning numbers. In most cases, it's the wheel, ball, and physical variables. I suppose you think it's voodoo?

Yes notto, youre thick. A very slow learner. So thick that you criticize clear fact as of it were nonsense.