Facts about Non-Random in 2019 and the cost of winning

[Anastasius]

Japanese
An exact day and date
A picture of a terminator doll 

[falkor2k15]

Japanese
An exact day and date
A picture of a terminator doll 

It's not a terminator doll... it's a baby doll inside a tank with one side representing victory of the all-seeing eye over the plagued masses following martial law.

[falkor2k15]

Here's the variance test I am looking into now based on High-Low EC Cycle:

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 D
2 2 D
1 D
2 2 2 2 D
1 1 1 D D 1 1 1 D
2 2 D D 2 2 2 2 2 2 D
1 1 D
2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 D
1 1 1 D
2 2 2 D
1 D
2 2 D D D
1 1 1 D
2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 D
1 D D 1 1 D D D
2 D
1 1 1 1 1 1 D
2 2 D D 2 2 2 D D 2 2 D
1 1 1 1 D
2 2 D D 2 2 2 2 2 2 D
1 1 1 1 1 D
2 D D 2 2 2 2 D
1 1 D
2 2 2 2 2 2 2 D
1 1 1 1 1 D D 1 1 1 1 1 1 D D D
2 D D 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 D D D
1 D
2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 D D 2 2 D D 2 2 D

[falkor2k15]

I might have found the basis for the HG, i.e. the missing concept?

Let's say we bet dozens CL2-3 twice:

1... bet 2+3
11 lose
1... bet 2+3
12... win

We had 1 loss and 1 win!

Now if we add line cycles alongside that:

D1...
L1...
bet L2+L3+L4+L5+L6
D11...
L12... win
D1...
L12...
bet D2+3
D12... win

Now we got 2 wins! The initial lines is usually in sync with the dozens, but the dozens unexpectedly got a CL1 - yet we still got the win playing on-behalf. So the HG could be about virtual wins and losses across separate streams and avoiding losses. Hard to explain...

[6th-sense]

Explain the best you can I’ve seen something like this too just wondering if your seeing the same thing

[falkor2k15]

Will do some testing first then try to explain further.

BTW, I just realised another interesting fact based on the above:
If Line 5 or 6 hits then Dozen 3 must also hit because they are dependent (on the same spin)
If Lines result in Cycle Length 2 then Dozens will mostly end on CL2 also because they are dependent (during a cycle) - but not always!

[falkor2k15]

As you know Lines 1 and 2 each overlap Dozen 1 by 50% each, but how do Dozen + Line cycles overlap?

Here's an exclusive first look at my analysis:

[falkor2k15]

This is more accurate:


But not all outcomes are possible at any given time - reminiscent of the fractal example.

[donik7777]

Please show on example what is LCL1
And DCL1

[RayManZ]

Please show on example what is LCL1
And DCL1

DCL1: 30, 30
LCL1:  30, 30
DCL2: 30,10,30
LCL2: 30,26,30

D(ozen) C(ycle) L(enght)

[falkor2k15]

I think I can finally answer this question after nearly 4 years:

“A dozen on the carpet, a dozen on the wheel, a selection of 12 numbers that changes constantly. Are they different? Do these bet selections result in changes to your predictions or the distribution?”
source: link:s://:.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=15938.0

When we combine 2 or more streams - such as dozens + lines or 4 EC options in the Fractal topic - we lock out certain outcomes at a given time. For example, Dozens CL2+Lines CL2 cannot immediately follow Dozens CL3+Lines CL3. So when it comes to the repeat or the deadlock, the distribution has changed over the course of an outer cycle or set of finite outcomes.  Therefore, we can never predict the next spin, but each sequence is no longer equally-likely = a change of distribution?

Perhaps VdW would be better at exploiting an unequal distribution because it doesn't bet every spin. Standard PHP repeats bet on every spin - unless there's a deadlock - or unless an outcome is currently locked out. So a few more concepts to add to the list there.

My other lead is when, say, Dozens CL2 appears without a Lines CL2; could this be a trigger for the double repeat or is there some kind of finite behaviour surrounding the single vs. double repeat?

[Herby]

Dozens CL2+Lines CL2 cannot immediately follow Dozens CL3+Lines CL3.

Hi falkor ,

100.000 spins: {Dozens CL, Lines CL}
Dozens CL3+Lines CL3 build together the end of a cycle:
here followed 67 times by Dozens CL2+Lines CL2

what did I get wrong ?

{{{3, 3}, {2, 2}}, 67}, {{{3, 3}, {2, 3}}, 115}, {{{3, 3}, {2,
   4}}, 89}, {{{3, 3}, {2, 5}}, 87}, {{{3, 3}, {2, 6}}, 30}, {{{3,
   3}, {2, 7}}, 6}, {{{3, 3}, {3, 2}}, 129}, {{{3, 3}, {3,
   3}}, 163}, {{{3, 3}, {3, 4}}, 187}, {{{3, 3}, {3, 5}}, 128}, {{{3,
   3}, {3, 6}}, 39}, {{{3, 3}, {3, 7}}, 12}, {{{3, 3}, {4,
   2}}, 124}, {{{3, 3}, {4, 3}}, 209}, {{{3, 3}, {4, 4}}, 199}, {{{3,
   3}, {4, 5}}, 135}, {{{3, 3}, {4, 6}}, 50}, {{{3, 3}, {4,
   7}}, 10}, {{{3, 3}, {5, 2}}, 72}, {{{3, 3}, {5, 3}}, 142}, {{{3,
   3}, {5, 4}}, 125}, {{{3, 3}, {5, 5}}, 76}, {{{3, 3}, {5,
   6}}, 29}, {{{3, 3}, {5, 7}}, 7}, {{{3, 3}, {6, 2}}, 28}, {{{3,
   3}, {6, 3}}, 55}, {{{3, 3}, {6, 4}}, 50}, {{{3, 3}, {6,
   5}}, 43}, {{{3, 3}, {6, 6}}, 14}, {{{3, 3}, {6, 7}}, 2}, {{{3,
   3}, {7, 2}}, 7}, {{{3, 3}, {7, 3}}, 8}, {{{3, 3}, {7,
   4}}, 7}, {{{3, 3}, {7, 5}}, 4}, {{{3, 3}, {7, 6}}, 6}

Greets from data desert

[falkor2k15]

That was a bad example - I meant on the very next spin.

[falkor2k15]

I think the secrets of the random thought topic might lie with vdw on dozens? It might present a similar scenario to number cycle cl25 where a deadlock is never encountered and our BR never gets exhausted - perhaps.

[mickavelli]

Hey Falkor,

I've spent the last "few months" deciphering posts from Dyksexlic and Rrbb.

After all "Language is a tool for concealing the truth"

Both were great with hints using a
NUMBER of LETTERS etc that are "clearly highlighted" within their POSTS

Seems like when Red was getting started his signature was also spelling mistakes
(You may or may not NO)

There is ALOT MORE to it , but what i can tell you is it is "quite interesting"

"So just wondering, anyone else explored this" ? [37]