HammerDown - For Now

[Maui13]

I am looking for someone who would be so kind to code this.

Preferably - inbox as I don't want to share the system here, and have all the naysayers going at me. 

This already took me a long time to do, and being distracted at least 5 times, I almost messed up. So taking out the human element just for testing purposes, would be GREAT and much appreciated. For the expert RX coder this shouldn't take too long.



Thanks in advance.
M

[Firefox]

Preferably - inbox as I don't want to share the system here, and have all the naysayers going at me. 

There is a special forum here to post systems where all the maths guys and advantage player naysayers are blocked from commenting:

link:s://:.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?board=108.0

Just saying  in case you weren't aware of it.

[Maui13]

Hey, it wouldn't be such a cool world if all of us agreed?

I just said it because I could 

Come on, I need some RX coding done, don't be like that 

[Robbert]

Dude, great! I wish i can code, but i cannot. Ignatus maybe or normy?

[Firefox]

It looks very Martingalish if that's a word Steady gain and steep drop - definitely not one for the faint hearted!

[Maui13]

It looks very Martingalish if that's a word Steady gain and steep drop - definitely not one for the faint hearted!

Not going to deny that fact that there is marty in there.... but you have to admit, not too bad hey?

Guess what, all of the graphs look like this...   

[Robbert]

It has to do something witt the rum bum eh?

[foreverBOB]

Too huge of a drawdown, auch!!

[Firefox]

Not too bad but still very scary  

It very much depends on the RNG and your luck, if testing it shows up the progression weakness. How many bets in your drawdown, was it 7 or 8, difficult to see? Many places won't let you get that far. But looks def worth softening your progression and accepting a less steady climb, just from the one graph you posted.

[Maui13]

It has to do something witt the rum bum eh?

BWHAAA!!!   

[Maui13]

Too huge of a drawdown, auch!!

If you had a 500 unit bankroll? What huge drawdown?

Some systems here hit as low as 2000 unit and then people still rave about it. Come on man, look at it for what it is.

300 spins, fairly consistent climb, 1 "big" draw down...  if I run this system 1,2,4,8 I'll still have a consistent climb in the graph.

[Maui13]

Not too bad but still very scary  

It very much depends on the RNG and your luck, if testing it shows up the progression weakness. How many bets in your drawdown, was it 7 or 8, difficult to see? Many places won't let you get that far. But looks def worth softening your progression and accepting a less steady climb, just from the one graph you posted.

Firefox - it's as raw as what it gets to systems. I just played the progression flat out to see if it would hit rock bottom. Now 1 x 8 step progression in 300 spins, is that bad. Be honest? Considering that very little people would even sit to play that.

This is the typical "hit & run" mojo.... 10 units and out.

I really believe its got potential. If only someone would step up.

[Firefox]

Are they roughly even chance type bets?

In which case an adverse run of 8 would come once in every 2^8 = 1 in  256 spins.

So your graph would be quite fair and typical of what to expect.

But once in every 512 plays (on average ) you'd get a depeer drop.

All depends on what you want from it. But if you played 100 spins a day for 5 days it comes to the same thing. At some stage you could expect a 9 step hit. (Assuming  it's a roughly even chance of missing.... if it's different to even, numbers will be slightly different)

[Maui13]

Are they roughly even chance type bets?

In which case an adverse run of 8 would come once in every 2^8 = 1 in  256 spins.

So your graph would be quite fair and typical of what to expect.

But once in every 512 plays (on average ) you'd get a depeer drop.

All depends on what you want from it. But if you played 100 spins a day for 5 days it comes to the same thing. At some stage you could expect a 9 step hit. (Assuming  it's a roughly even chance of missing.... if it's different to even, numbers will be slightly different)

Yes it's even chance, the bet selection is not my own creation but I'll give credit where due once RX'd

I was thinking to only go 1,2,4,8 and the graph would still have a steady climb.

But I've come to get to know you, and I know you are not one for systems, I do appreciate your valuable input as I have a LOT to still learn.
Joined the forum back in 2010, on/off only played live in the casino twice as I was just to scared to trust what I then believed was an awesome system. ( CODE 4 )

So I guess the reason why I asked someone to RX, is purely to put my mind at ease a bit to see that if I did play this every day for 10 units only, if I would come out on top at the end of a month.

Anyway, that was me mumbling on and on.

Ciao,
M

[Firefox]

Systems are fine for fun, but they are not money making tools. It's more for entertainment in making them up and the thrill of playing I guess 

But 10 spins a day for a month, you'd on average get one 8 bet adverse run. You might get three, you might get none, but your graph is typical.

It doesn't matter if you play one session of 300 spins or 30 of 10 the chance is the same of getting a bad streak.

It's impossible to say if you will be up after a month, and no amount of testing can tell you really. But once every 256 spins for a bad run of 8 is what chance alone says.