Cant grasp unlimited randomness

[Anastasius]

If today a person can test a million rng spins over a couple of days. So can test billions quickly and see limits for example a single number will hit 9 times in a row eventually.

How can randomness not have a limit since that would mean eventually a single number would hit 1000s of times in row.

Therefore the limits are there for those able to test.
Therefore  roulettes beatable  played within the limits.

[Anastasius]

Not just limitz but also most common categorys that stay same for million spins such as most common repeaters before x happens

[Firefox]

Anything can happen, it's just some events are very unlikely.

Don't get carried away with testing. Most times systems can be proved useless without testing. If you don't have an edge somehow on the accuracy of prediction of  a number occurring more times than 1/37 then the system will be a waste of time .

[Anastasius]

If over millions of spins 8 uniques is the most common before the first  repeat. Why cant someone test how many times this bet will miss  and make a method around that

Also why is 8 even the most common is it some math  thing.why doesnt it alternate if its random .

[Bigbroben]

8 in not the most common, it is the average.
The most common are 5,6,7.


1st column: how many nrs you play
2nd: Odds of winning (n/37)
3rd: %age of runs that will face this bet
4th: %age of runs that will win this bet.

So if you multiply A by B it gives you the percentage of winnings at n-numbers.


Most common win is with 6nrs at 10,6% of runs.
You also see that 34,7361% of the runs will hit after 8nrs.

[Firefox]

@Anastasius

It's some maths thing!

Chance 1st number is unique
37/37

Chance 2nd number is unique
37/37 x 36/37

Chance 3rd number is unique
37/37 x 36/37 x 35/37
.
.
.

Chance  8th number is unique
37/37 x  36/37 .......    30/37 = ? ? ?

Grab a calculator and check it out for yourself. You will prove for yourself why. You'll find chance goes less than 0.5.

Non of this offers you any advantage in predicting the next number though!

[Anastasius]

Even 6 numbers then is most common. . And in million runs how many times will it go over 6 and miss the bet

50.100.200? I dont get with  the info of most common events that some method cant be made.

Or even with  the triple graphs .. the most common spin numbers...how many times can they miss...

[Anastasius]

Betting 6 uniques is better than betting any 6 random numbers right?

[Bigbroben]

It's not better, it's just different.

[Anastasius]

What i mean is will u have the same losing streak as 6 bet randomly

And i dont believe in math.
It hits the 6 most through wheel magic

[Firefox]

Betting 6 uniques is better than betting any 6 random numbers right?

Uniques/repeaters etc are all irrelevant. It's exactly the same chance.

Uniques/repeaters are gambler's fallacy methods. You will lose money to the house edge by employing these tactics.

[Anastasius]

Did anyone test the total losing streaks of these methods and make a progression from the strings of losses.

Or even the most common amount of losses before the win like xxxx then win is most common so always bet after 4 misses

[Anastasius]

The most common won't  be 6 uniques and then win. It will go over a few times first  most commonly before  the majority of wins

[Bigbroben]

Did anyone test the total losing streaks of these methods and make a progression from the strings of losses.

Or even the most common amount of losses before the win like xxxx then win is most common so always bet after 4 misses

Probably lots of people have test this before.  I think I did too one day.

[Anastasius]

And it cant work  even with waiting x losses.