Cant grasp unlimited randomness

[Firefox]

They are both the same 1/37

For which you get paid 35:1 Therefore they are both losing .

The chance that 22 comes up three times in a row  is a rare event .

1 in 50,000

So you are averse to betting 22 again because the event of three in a row is rare.

But since the double has already happened that is history and has no relevance.

The chance that 22 will occur  Now is still 1/37.

You are falling victim to the fallacy, and you are doing the same with your 6 or 8 uniques.

The previous 6 numbers make no difference to the probability of the next result.

[Anastasius]

Its always 1/37 i understand

But if in million spins u saw instead 18 max numbers only 10 u could wait spin 25 then marty and always catch a win 99.9% of time. By the time u have a loss u would have won 1000 progressions. Im sure somewhere u can always get a win in x spins.

[Firefox]

It's the same as playing a Marty on an even chance. The previous results have no relevance.

You can only double up 6 or 7 times. You have a 1 in 128 chance of losing a full 7x Marty. So 99.something percent.

So Marty doesn't change anything. It gives you good promise of short term wins, but on the 128th time or sooner, you'll lose everything plus more on top.

[Anastasius]

A triple up is a max of 18 numbers in 50 spins. The most common is 3 doubles. I meant if the max was 10 instead of 18. .. it a bigger range if u start spin 25 with 4 numbers. Theres 100.000 progressions in this range. Ita just out of reach  still  u end up betting to much and after many spins it still will exceed 50 spins

[Steve]

Anastasius, it's simple. The odds of an event increase with amount of spins.

There is no limit. Like a dog chasing it's tail.

You are confusing probability in x number of spins. It's like saying in a single coin toss, the limit is 2 possibilities. So what? Does it help?

What if we did 10 tosses, or 20, 300,300000?

[Anastasius]

some graphs show 1000s of wins with few numbers before bust the prgression its always just out of reach though so far

[Anastasius]

broben

is there anything on your excel spreadhseet with where u can bet just for example 8 uniques then 1 bet only that shows the maximum amount of losses ina row or the most common losses b4 the win, im getting very good results from ur graph

[Firefox]

some graphs show 1000s of wins....

Which graphs?

Take most graphs you see posted on this forum with a very large pinch of salt, though I'd trust BigB's graphs more than some others.

Most graphs are posted using the selection device of rose tinted spectacles!

[Anastasius]

broben forget what i said i just saw 21 losses in a row now im only curious about the most common amount of losses before a win

like example 5 losses before a win happened 132 times in many spins
then second most common is 3 losses before a win which happens 100 times

but im only interested in the most common amount of losses
is there a way to find that for 6 numbers

[Anastasius]

Theres many graphs for each level of repeater  and other events basically tells u whats gunna happen long term whether u believe it... its still out of reach tho  the perfect  range doesnt mean it doesnt exist

[Steve]

You're not getting it. What does all that matter if you're winning at 1 in 37 but only get paid 35-1?

Repeaters, hot, cold, crossing lines, due, streaks, random limits.. all bullshit. They happen with RNG, real wheels or whatever.

People are still clueless to the fundamental problem: the payouts are lower than the odds.

[Proofreaders2000]

Betting 6 uniques is better than betting any 6 random numbers right?

Mathematically no.  Every number has a 1 in
37 (1 in 38 American Wheel) chance of winning.

So technically it would be (1/37) to the sixth power
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Moreover uniques tend to go stale for long periods (from observation)

I just witnessed a string of 14 consecutive unique
singles.  In and of themselves they are not reliable to bet.

[Firefox]

I think he is getting confused with the fact that if we start watching now then there's more likely to be a repeat starting around the 7th to 8th spin, if the first few are uniques.

That's correct, but it's not the same thing as waiting for x uniques and then start betting for them to repeat.

Once those uniques have gone, they are history. The wheel has no memory, it resets every spin. So those uniques may as just as well be any randoms.

It's sometimes a difficult thing to get your head around, but it's a fact which will save a lot of cash.

I feel like a repeater myself!

[Proofreaders2000]

I have been inspired by this thread.  Here is
an attempt to exploit six consecutive uniques.

*Been noticing this phenomena
quite a bit.  Perhaps it is exploitable.

-----*Six consecutive uniques 'pause' system*-----

Procedure: Track six consecutive unique singles. (qualifier)
Wait the next six spins.  (Doesn't matter if any of the six show or not)

Bet those six original uniques for up to six spins. 
Stop on a win or after six consecutive misses.

Example: 12,0,31,7,14,3 (qualifier)
...2,0,13,9,14,6 (trigger)

Bet 12,0,31,7,14,3 for up to six spins.

[Proofreaders2000]

If all six bets miss (or a hit but not in profit) start the
Procedure over with the newest six consecutive uniques.

Stop when in profit.

Total bankroll requirement: 144 units