Significance

[precogmiles]

I'm not denying the possibility of precognition, but I'm skeptical. You say look at your results on MPR, and sure, you're at the top, but I don't even know how the score works; what is it measuring? And there are others who also have positive scores who presumably are NOT using precognition. For a start, I need to know exactly how the scores are calculated.

There is no evidence that precognition works. The infamous study by Daryl Bem, which is what everyone cites when trying to show that precog has merit, was shown to be flawed. It doesn't matter so much that there is no theoretical model, there is no satisfactory model for quantum mechanics either, just a lot of speculation and multiple interpretations. But the difference is that QM WORKS. Even if ONE person could be proved to have precognitive abilities it would be enough, but it hasn't happened.

This is exactly what I mean. You will never accept it. You hold the belief that it is not possible and just give lip service to its possibility. This is because your high priests have yet to give you their approval that it is ok to believe in precognition.

You are seriously behind in the research if you think dr Bems results have been found to be flawed. Not only were they shown to be accurate but what ensued was exactly my original point. Since it is scientific heresy to believe in anything remotely ‘magical’ or what appears ‘supernatural’ or what does not fit well into their materialist paradigm the psychology community have found themselves in a embarrassing light. Rather than accept what is actually real, and accept the facts as they are, they instead use irrational arguments against the study.

The problem is data similar to Dr Bem findings have been reproduced time and again.

[Firefox]

If one looks at string theory, parallel universes in 10 or 11 dimensions according to M theory or super string theory, then a lot of it has to do with our timeline and alternate time lines.

It's a very new branch of theoretical physics only extant since the 1960s and really developed in the 1990s. We only need to be able to understand how to shift, to tap into another dimension or time line for a split second. This may be done in the future by means of headsets or other devices  or just the raw development of the human brain over many thousands of years.

Or we could be seeing the first beginnings now. Very difficult to say, but it's a new aspect of physics relatively unexplored.

[Joe]

This is exactly what I mean. You will never accept it. You hold the belief that it is not possible and just give lip service to its possibility. This is because your high priests have yet to give you their approval that it is ok to believe in precognition.

The truth is that it doesn't interest me so I'm not motivated to try to find out for myself whether it's true or not. None of us have unlimited time and resources so we have to make choices and prioritize. I'm more interested in the possibility of finding a winning system because I like statistics and programming, but this possibility is also dismissed as nonsense by the "high priests" you refer to, so it's not that I'm letting them determine my choices.

It's so easy to accuse people of not having an open mind, but do you know what having an open mind means? it means being able to change your mind when the evidence shows you are wrong, and that's very hard to do especially when you've invested a lot of time and effort into your favourite theory. And when people try hard to convince you that their pet theory is the truth it just makes me think that they really doubt it and are looking for validation.

[ati]

I was very skeptic about anything psychic, then I did a lot of research, I started meditating and it completely changed my opinion. I felt for myself how the magnetic energy of my body raised, I felt the invisible energy points (chakras) in my body during meditations. And I was also able to see numbers appearing on plain white surfaces when my focus was good. Sadly after many months of practice I did not have any consistency, and I could not improve my accuracy at all.

I know in this day and age videos don't prove anything. But you can check out this channel if you want link:s://:.youtube.com/user/TheRouletteWarrior/videos
They are real pros and easily live off of roulette or any casino games. They never tell you what's the best and most efficient ways to practice, because Ramtha school students have to sign a non-disclosure agreement.

[precogmiles]

The truth is that it doesn't interest me so I'm not motivated to try to find out for myself whether it's true or not. None of us have unlimited time and resources so we have to make choices and prioritize. I'm more interested in the possibility of finding a winning system because I like statistics and programming, but this possibility is also dismissed as nonsense by the "high priests" you refer to, so it's not that I'm letting them determine my choices.

It's so easy to accuse people of not having an open mind, but do you know what having an open mind means? it means being able to change your mind when the evidence shows you are wrong, and that's very hard to do especially when you've invested a lot of time and effort into your favourite theory. And when people try hard to convince you that their pet theory is the truth it just makes me think that they really doubt it and are looking for validation.

Do what you want. I don't care.