JavaScript to code a Roulette Bot - 2019

[Firefox]

I bet on RED if the history shows 10 flipping numbers last 10 rounds like:
RED BLACK RED BLACK RED BLACK RED BLACK RED BLACK RED

That's just fallacy territory.  Red or black are equally likely after this or any other sequence.

I'm surprised you are subscribing to such ideas, as you obviously have talents on the programming side.

[webstars]

That's just fallacy territory.  Red or black are equally likely after this or any other sequence.

I'm surprised you are subscribing to such ideas, as you obviously have talents on the programming side.

If anyone, have more experience in a good stable method to play, you can share it here, so i will make a bot and share it here.

But coming here and hating and saying the the method is shit, is unproductive. Why we all are here?

Best regards

[webstars]

Anyway.

My Laptop currently has only 4GB RAM, thats why my computer lags a bit in recording. So i can do not much on my PC simultanesly. I can only play or scripting, but not at the same time atm.
   
I have made enough money that i have bought 16GB RAM and a SSD, which i get TOMORROW.   
Then i will start to work more on my bot and expand it. 

Best regards

[Steve]

But coming here and hating and saying the the method is shit, is unproductive. Why we all are here?

What If the method really is shit?
Call it awesome, to be polite?

What If it's so old and proven to fail, and has been posting here thousands of times before?

You won enough for 16gb ram. For many players that amount is a wager on 1 spin. Any winning is good, but you need more testing and learning. There are some experienced players here to help. The forum could use more coders.

Focus on coding systems for rapid testing.

[webstars]

What If the method really is shit?
Call it awesome, to be polite?

What If it's so old and proven to fail, and has been posting here thousands of times before?

You won enough for 16gb ram. For many players that amount is a wager on 1 spin. Any winning is good, but you need more testing and learning. There are some experienced players here to help. The forum could use more coders.

Focus on coding systems for rapid testing.

Thanks for your kind response.
So far my method works well for me, i have some experience. And maybe you can see it in the topic that this is not a system that i share. I share knowledge for the programmers here.

I have 8 Methods in my bot currently.

If someone has a good method that i could program, please write here or contact me.

Till now 4 GB was enough for me. I thought its a good a reason to upgrade my laptop
16GB ram + SSD = 130â,¬
This is my current winnings in 1 day Starting balance 50â,¬ end balance: 180â,¬

Best regards

[webstars]

LAGGGGGIIIIINNNGGGG

[Firefox]

I didn't say it was shit. I said it was a fallacy method. That's just an accurate statement. It's the exact definition of a fallacy bet, LOL.

It's not shit, but offers you no advantage over any other random EC bet after any other sequence you care to mention, be it a rare or common one 

[Joe]

I'm surprised you are subscribing to such ideas, as you obviously have talents on the programming side.

I don't see why this should be so; you can be an ace programmer but be clueless when it comes to statistics and probability.

[Firefox]

You can be, but it's more unlikely than likely. Programmers are generally logical, have a good grasp of  mathematics, and statistics too.

[Steve]

If you have an idea, code it.
Running the program will tell you if your idea was shit.

That's why coders usually have good logic. But still if the programmer hasnt coded their understanding and tested,  they probably won't know better.

The result isn't opinion. Just like what does and doesn't work.

[Joe]

I don't think it's helpful to criticize system players by saying they're not logical. Even though they may agree that the next spin is independent from the last and all outcomes are equally likely probability-wise, they see that (for instance) longer streaks are relatively rare, so "logically" it seems to make sense to bet that a short or medium length streak won't become a long one. The logic of independent and equally likely outcomes seems like mere theory whereas what you actually SEE is that there is a regularity (long streaks are "rare") so this becomes one of the favored MO's for system players. I'm not defending it, just saying that it only seems to be long experience which finally convinces people that those methods don't work.

And it doesn't help that most don't understand how to test properly. If you want to know whether your hypothesis is true you need  a "control" group, but most don't use one. If they ran a  parallel test betting randomly they would quickly see that there is no difference in the results.

[webstars]

If you have an idea, code it.
Running the program will tell you if your idea was shit.

That's why coders usually have good logic. But still if the programmer hasnt coded their understanding and tested,  they probably won't know better.

The result isn't opinion. Just like what does and doesn't work.

I have allready coded and making money consistently with almost no progression...

I use 8 strategies on 22 tables
I look for patterns that almost "never" happen.

[Steve]

Yes, you told us. You paid for new pc ram.

Your system works.

[webstars]

Yes, you told us. You paid for new pc ram.

Your system works.

and a SSD. I use 8 systems and all over i make money

[Joe]

I look for patterns that almost "never" happen.

Can you show us some of these patterns? Just one will do.

Every pattern of the same length has the same probability as any other pattern. RRRRRR has the same chance as RRBRBB which looks more "random".