True/Fair Randomness

[andreib1986]

You mean the method i posted 2 weeks ago? Sometimes wins, sometimes looses just not enough. I can post the excel to play with if you want.

[Steve]

I tested everything imaginable, including random strings for repeatability. Basically every pattern was an effect, that had a cause. Repeaters can happen with poor quality rng. Like excel which is very poor.

[Anastasius]

Pls lol someone test.

Wait 2 uniques. Bet all unhits then as they hit remove bets .if u lose add one unit and continue  until uv won 13 times then stop so (15 uniques) i just wana see it lose excel pls

[andreib1986]

Remember that you also play against 0.

[zhone]

What did u test zhone wait 18 then bet just 18 for rest of set

Yes, wait till 18 numbers are covered, then bet once. No progression. Win or lose, conclude and reset for next round. Only tested using random.org numbers. Anyway, 4,000 qualifying bets could be too few to conclude anything, that's why I asked if anyone has tested this method long enough to verify the"bias" concept.

[Steve]

Anas, that was basically one of my old systems. It didnt work, then I added progression and reset after wins. It lasted longer because of progression but had same end result.

There are many ways to repackage shit.

Try starting by checking what others already tried. Then get to understand why the losing approaches lose.

[andreib1986]

For real wheels, use real physical variables.

If you want to play rng, attack the rng integrity.

I was thinking if there could be any edge by betting a high number with 0, as there will be 3 agains 2 spots on on the wheel covered?

[Steve]

Each pocket has its own independent odds.

I dont understand why you think betting 2 instead of 3 pockets is better if spins are random. Theres only a benefit to sector betting if the ball is more likely to hit around specific numbers.

[Anastasius]

Inagine the waiting for 18 uniques. I could test  that heaps ill let u know zhone .so it didnt fail? How far ahead was it

I was following alone marking the layout then when shapes got made i bet like splits and squares or lines

[Steve]

Even if you wait for 36 uniques, the odds of any number on the next or any future spins hasnt changed. So all your waiting means jack shit. It doesnt help even a little.

Why is it so hard to understand?

[andreib1986]

Anyway, 4000 spins atack would take at least 5 days of play, and meanwhile table will reset.

[andreib1986]

Please don't be to harsh on this Steve,

My method idea would be: Bet High numbers 18 units
                                                 Bet Numbers 0,3,5,8,10,15,16 1 unit Total 25 units, On win 11 units.
Bet selection: Follow sets of 3 spins.
                         ALWAYS bet when table is reseted to 0.
Ex: Spin 1, win. 2 Spins spins left, mathematical 1 should be a loss. Don't bet on spin 2. If virtual loss, bet on spin 3. If spin 2 win don't bet on spin 3. If all 3 spins are wins wait untill next reset. So now we expect 2 losses in a set. If we get in the next set a loss, we might bet on spin number 2 and use a progression for spin number 3 if we loose as we consider that the reverse will not come immediatly.

[andreib1986]

Duplicate

[Anastasius]

If most of the time its 25 uniques then 24 come out in a row.thats more wins than losses for 13 spins

[zhone]

Inagine the waiting for 18 uniques. I could test  that heaps ill let u know zhone .so it didnt fail? How far ahead was it

I was following alone marking the layout then when shapes got made i bet like splits and squares or lines

No, not 18 uniques. Just any 18 numbers being covered. Could be uniques, repeats, etc...