Lines, Pos of Lines

[Person S]

Person,

Thank you very much. That is very helpful. I get the first stream 412356 4

Then the second 241356 3 dumb question...why is the 3 last instead of the 2? The 2 is the one that hit.

Thank you again.

Because 2 is in position 3.
A parallel flow is a position.
Here is an example.
6 612345 - was in position 6, we write 6.
6 612345 6
Next number 3 - look at what position is now 3?
Read rrbb several times and you will understand the algorithm!

[Person S]

Look at where the repeats land in the second stream.

There are 195 repeats in the example, 187 of them are on the derived "low" (<4)

95%

Do you think Red, it makes sense to skip the set if the replay did not come?

[redhot]

Or is the other option simpler..keeping an eye on what ds is moving into the derived low positions ? But again it’s how to sync it for the repeat before it happens..the percentage is high after the fact but the problem is the spins beforehand with no repeat..

This is the problem, we know 'where' the repeat will happen but we don't know 'when'

So we would need to bet the derived low on each spin to catch the repeat - but this can't work, there will be times where the uniques are hitting (the derived high) and we'll lose.

So we need to cover both, but that can't work either, we can't bet on the derived high and the derived low at the same time and cover all options.

We need to eliminate some options then and find a reason to bet some of the derived high and some of the derived low.

Any ideas on how to do this?

[6th-sense]

This is the problem, we know 'where' the repeat will happen but we don't know 'when'

So we would need to bet the derived low on each spin to catch the repeat - but this can't work, there will be times where the uniques are hitting (the derived high) and we'll lose.

So we need to cover both, but that can't work either, we can't bet on the derived high and the derived low at the same time and cover all options.

We need to eliminate some options then and find a reason to bet some of the derived high and some of the derived low.

Any ideas on how to do this?

First idea off the top of my head is it begins and ends in normal cycle..only the ds or ds,s out in normal stream would be bet for a repeat if they are in the derived low stream

[Blueprint]

What is it you're trying to achieve with this data?

[Person S]

My idea is that we switch between the main stream and the positions.
We do not play them together at the same time. There must be a switch, so we are going with the flow.
Whether it can create a slope is not visible yet * (

[6th-sense]

What is it you're trying to achieve with this data?

The high percentage of what redhot showed ..just seeing if there is an advantage using it..or a way to use it ..quads look similar too ..always fascinated me the streams tracker

[Irish88]

Because 2 is in position 3.
A parallel flow is a position.
Here is an example.
6 612345 - was in position 6, we write 6.
6 612345 6
Next number 3 - look at what position is now 3?
Read rrbb several times and you will understand the algorithm!

Ok I got it now. Thanks very much for your help. Much appreciated. Is the point to bet on the lines from the first half of the stream because they have the highest likelihood of repeating?

[Blueprint]

The high percentage of what redhot showed ..just seeing if there is an advantage using it..or a way to use it ..quads look similar too ..always fascinated me the streams tracker

It’s versatile and applies to all partitions.

[6th-sense]

thankyou blueprint you are right..i see it on the tracker

[Blood Angel]

..i see it on the tracker

Is the tracker available somewhere to download?

[Person S]

Position is a brother of random flow. About, the position!
Open your secret doors before us, we see that repetitions come from above, but they also look exactly the same in a random stream. Where are we going...

[Person S]

Sorry I have no answer ...

[Blueprint]

Sorry I have no answer ...

The problem is you think there is one.

[Person S]

I wanted to show you something, maybe this analogy will be inappropriate, but I will try.
The fact that we fight this edge is 2.7%.
It seems crazy to cope with this advantage, but, for example, if we take a poker game and see how much the strongest hand has against the weakest one. This figure of 2.7% in itself seems insignificant, but even here we need a strategy on how to cope with all this.
Probably good roulette players understand this and can draw conclusions from what is happening. And in time to switch gears. Yes, you say there is a post-flop, and there are different situations. But simply if you make a projection from the edge of the house to the edge of poker there is a difference.
This is not a challenge, but just want to show.
AA has an advantage of 93%.