Wheel layout

[Anastasius]

I think there will be an anomaly with the wheel layout after recording 37 spins i have many similarities  for example the number or numbers to hit 3 times will likely have at least one of its neighbours hit and also 4 numbers have usually hit side by side.

Does anyone play like this with layout patterns

[Firefox]

Plenty of people do, but this kind of pattern is random and meaningless after 37 spins. You need 1000  and preferably more.

[6th-sense]

I think there will be an anomaly with the wheel layout after recording 37 spins i have many similarities  for example the number or numbers to hit 3 times will likely have at least one of its neighbours hit and also 4 numbers have usually hit side by side.

Does anyone play like this with layout patterns

thats excactly what started me on the vaddis bet and this was involved ..firefox is right it has to be kept in the cycle..beyond is no good on this

[Anastasius]

What is vaddis method

Im thinking to wait until 3 have hit side by side then flank them or something else like if one number triples then flank it

[6th-sense]

What is vaddis method

Im thinking to wait until 3 have hit side by side then flank them or something else like if one number triples then flank it

link:://:.money-maker-machine.com/forum/general-discussion/wish-i-could-openly-share-roulette-grail/?PHPSESSID=1pr3cfpv29n5hq0uo5iijfics6

[Anastasius]

I dont believe. He gave virtually  nothing except repeats and 6 to 10 numbers... he woulda just disappeared  and played...to u believe this riddle?

Im thinming 37 spins

Play for first  r3
And incorporate the wheel layout to predict the 3rd....  r3 happens 99.99999 % by spin 47....   i have some good ideas so far...

[Firefox]

thats excactly what started me on the vaddis bet and this was involved ..firefox is right it has to be kept in the cycle..beyond is no good on this

I was trying to say 37 spins are not statistically significant.

This is because the standard deviation is proportional to the square root of the number of spins.

Take 10 spins. The SD is K x 3.16
Take 100 spins. The SD is K x 10

The number of spins went up ten times but the SD went up only 3 times  (approx).

Thus as the number of trials gets larger, the standard deviation in proportion to those trials gets smaller.

This is a very important result.

However, basically it means you are wasting your time looking at 37 spins. But deviations from randomness are much easier to identify over a larger number of spins. And also the figures are more likely to be a reflection of reality.

Ever wondered why opinion polls have at least one  or two thousand people in the sample? This is why.

Same with number of roulette spins.

[Steve]

I dont believe. He gave virtually  nothing except repeats and 6 to 10 numbers... he woulda just disappeared  and played...to u believe this riddle?

Yes don't be so gullible. Focus on the core of what he said regarding repeaters. It's fallacy. It's using past spins in a way that has no connection to the future spins. The law of a third is basic probability. Saying it HAS to happen is as misguided as saying all numbers HAVE to spin... eventually. Great, but it changes nothing.

Vaddi was just another anonymous person on the internet speaking shit, and chances are they had or even still have other usernames.

What does it take to fool gullible people? Just give wishy washy clues and claim it's the holy grail. The gullible people don't understand basic probability and why the claims are just shit.

[Proofreaders2000]

Anastasius, I will take one more stab at the Vaddi riddle.

I think it is nine numbers that resemble a windmill.

Four windmills of three sector numbers.

"How do you play all the numbers on the wheel?"

Play each windmill once per cycle.

[Proofreaders2000]

"Windmill" Sectors like this: (European Wheel)

A: 32, 15, 19          36,11,30          14,31,9
B: 4,21,2                 8,23,10            22,18,29
C: 25,17,34             5,24,16            7,28,12
D: 6,27,13              33,1,20             35,3,26

Play once in any order (a cycle)

[Anastasius]

proofreader could u please test this with only real spins.

start tracking numbers,
then if a number triples it game over and start again ( u are looking  for the double ups)
anytime you are tracking and say you have 4 double ups , you are looking for 2 that are side by side on wheel layout)
you then only flat bet these 2 numbers, if anymore double ups occur and become neighbours of these you add them to ( usually a max of 4 neighbours in rare events) then continue flat bet until triple up,,,, if another number occurs then just re track.

also if any of your other double ups make a pair side by side u bet them also.... u just dont bet the ones that are single..... yeh or no?

[6th-sense]

I was trying to say 37 spins are not statistically significant.

This is because the standard deviation is proportional to the square root of the number of spins.

Take 10 spins. The SD is K x 3.16
Take 100 spins. The SD is K x 10

The number of spins went up ten times but the SD went up only 3 times  (approx).

Thus as the number of trials gets larger, the standard deviation in proportion to those trials gets smaller.

This is a very important result.

However, basically it means you are wasting your time looking at 37 spins. But deviations from randomness are much easier to identify over a larger number of spins. And also the figures are more likely to be a reflection of reality.

Ever wondered why opinion polls have at least one  or two thousand people in the sample? This is why.

Same with number of roulette spins.

😎👍 very good reply as always

.

[6th-sense]

Yes don't be so gullible. Focus on the core of what he said regarding repeaters. It's fallacy. It's using past spins in a way that has no connection to the future spins. The law of a third is basic probability. Saying it HAS to happen is as misguided as saying all numbers HAVE to spin... eventually. Great, but it changes nothing.

Vaddi was just another anonymous person on the internet speaking shit, and chances are they had or even still have other usernames.

What does it take to fool gullible people? Just give wishy washy clues and claim it's the holy grail. The gullible people don't understand basic probability and why the claims are just shit.

It’s not law if the third its the mechanics of roulette..
Waiting for all numbers to appear is that mechanics in action playing taking the average third of everything every cycle unhits unique repeats until those numbers appear..
And all other locations in there own cycles
It’s not magical it’s present for all to see
That’s not a farcical statement or one to toss aside with basic anything goes or happens every cycle
The thing is the odds and you can’t predict what third is going to hit in that next cycle ..
Or so you seem to think..
I’m not stuck in turbo mode before you start ranting
I’m stuck in 6th sense mode
Numbers themselves is just one partition of the overall cycles and is expensive to do

[6th-sense]

this is probably the best subject on here about law of the third

link:s://:.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=4960.0

[Steve]

Clues:
 
   For the most part: every 37 spin results in ...

   24 hits = 14 singles + 10 doubles

Its not law of a third?