HOLY GRAIL 90-100% winrate

[Mister Eko]

Does anybody have the same results like ignatus?

[Johnoholic]

Hi Ignatus, in your previous post u told us that u have tested 50k spins nonstop. May I know how do u defined your win goal? For example, your win goal is 250, then u stop/restart, nonstop mean u will continue to play with another 250 win goal. If u play non stop, what is the difference if u play 250+250+250 win goal with only 500 or 750 or 1000 win goal?
Just a friendly, clarification needed, appreciate your hard work on this.

[Steve]

For years, the truth was on my nose and i still didn't see it. Most of you are still well in that stage. When you finally understand it, you'll regret the wasted time.

[ignatus]

Hi Ignatus, in your previous post u told us that u have tested 50k spins nonstop. May I know how do u defined your win goal? For example, your win goal is 250, then u stop/restart, nonstop mean u will continue to play with another 250 win goal. If u play non stop, what is the difference if u play 250+250+250 win goal with only 500 or 750 or 1000 win goal?
Just a friendly, clarification needed, appreciate your hard work on this.

Well, the difference between WG+250/SL-500 and WG+750/SL-1000 IS ofcourse (from testing trial and error, these losing sessions with +250/500 i wanted to turn into winning sessions, therefore i tested increase SL until it became a winner, and this "limit" for this particular bet was SL -1000u, Also, to make it Profitable with this kind of Stoploss, I also had to increase WG to +750u, (Real play this is ofc an unrealistic WG, because it takes some thousand of spins to reach that.....so ofc, playing for real, you STILL would need a 1000u BR/SL (since this was the most profitable) and so on, To summarize +250/-500 WG/SL *does not* give the same profit/winrate as +750/-1000 (as i´ve tested from trial and error). 

[Steve]

Ignatus, your bet selection method changes nothing. Accuracy is unchanged. So your system is no better than random bets.

You aren't getting past the fact that trawling system rules will change the results. That's because different bets will mean either better or worse results. It doesn't mean the system is better or worse.

[Steve]

Really i want you to succeed. You work hard. But you're still looking in the wrong area and not understanding basics, like almost everyone else.

[ignatus]

But you're still looking in the wrong area and not understanding basics

May be so, but we play in different ways, this is carpet-based and played with a neg. progressionline. End of story. Now you may argue this is "bad",....but then, you can do your testings yourself, and see that this system works, perfectly fine.

Only because you play different, good... now this is what is what it is, just accept it. Only then Winrate/profits need to be proven (as i have Already proven, this IS a profitable system with a high winrate)...And that´s all that matters to me.

[Steve]

but we play in different ways

I'm not talking about how I play. I'm talking plain what does and doesn't work, and why.

Only because you play different, good... now this is what is what it is, just accept it

Again you're acting like I'm criticizing your method because of my personal preference.

If you are winning, keep doing it. Many times I once thought I had a great system, and it was working well. Then later I learned it may have performed better over a set amount of spins, but this had to do with amount of numbers covered and the progression - and some luck. I repeated this process many times and it ended in eventual disappointment, and the realization that my bet selection was completely ineffective. But everyone needs to learn that for themselves.

[Pave]

Some test results. Quite much every method loss roulette some point, i think longer you play some point house edge gets you.  But the sad thing is that the loss can come though not play for long
If you think of the history of the big winners of roulette, all have bet just single straight numbers, so  imagining that you would win other bets like split corner .etc is just a waste of time.

[ignatus]

You are not meat to play that way. As i said MONEYMANAGEMENT is crucial. With a wrong SL/WG you WILL lose ofc? ......this is just a stupid example..... if you would have listened to what i said. You *must* play with a 1000u BR/Stoploss. Everytime you LOSE that amount in one session, that is one LOST session. everytime you WIN 750u (or whatever you wingoal is).... Go try again, count and compare then your winnings to your losses. I have already demostrated that with a 1000u BR/Stoploss and 750u wingoal you WILL win more than you lose. That´s for sure. Playing endlessly like this? No. That´s wrong...

[Pave]

Is stop loss 500 units when start playing 1000 units win 750 it would be more low risk when win goal would be 30-50% so win like 300-500units when start play 1000 units

[Pave]

Test some evolution gaming live roulette each table just 100 spins played

[Pave]

more results

[Pave]

results more

[Pave]

Win 100 spins like around 30-60 units. So if win goal is 750 units, you need play quite much lot of spins maybe too much need rather long session over 1000 spins so who would play so many spins so long very long gaming session.