Is roulette spins truly random ?

[gizmotron2]

Do you expect someone post on such roulette forum this huge math finding ?

I have known that this would happen someday.

I don't want to blow the brain cells required to write the math for this. So I decided to overwhelm the world with a kind of human nature experiment instead. Many times the math the formula or discovery comes first and then it has applications in life that validate it. I have no desire to get the attention of the mathematics world by showing them the formula first. That's too much unrewarding work.

So I have decided to hand the world the practical application of a yet unknown math that can explain it. The validation comes first. It also makes a few people very happy for the time being. So I'm deliberately doing the unexpected. Perhaps you can explain this as foolishness or delusional. But what if it is objective truth? There is also that possibility. All I ask is that people give it 2 weeks to a month trying it before declaring what it is. How could they possibly know without checking it out.

We all know that the absolutist faction of the probability world will find this a threat to all they they preach. Their entire basis and foundation for reason is about to crumble. So I expect fireworks.

[Joe]

Nobody will ever post evidence or proof of dependency. Keep asking and keep waiting. Enjoy yourself.

Of course not, because if it exists it would be tantamount to posting the HG.

I'm not asking for any such thing, I'm just asking for 1) your definition of dependence, and 2) How you would test for it. Please include as much detail as possible. BTW, this applies also to Gizmo since he is also claiming he has the grail. 

[luckyfella]

I'm currently destroying all known math that applies to gambling and the so called house advantage. Only in that revelation will you find a possible connection to this thread with respect that the math must be validated during a search for a connection thru dependency.

Good luck with that.

Your quest is a difficult one.

You must have a reason for your quest. I don't have any reason. So

I wish you the very best.

[gizmotron2]

Of course not, because if it exists it would be tantamount to posting the HG.

I'm not asking for any such thing, I'm just asking for 1) your definition of dependence, and 2) How you would test for it. Please include as much detail as possible. BTW, this applies also to Gizmo since he is also claiming he has the grail. 

Good, a real question that deserves the respect of a real answer. I have already posted that HG in the full wide open where I have openly answered all questions. It's found in the Roulette section under the title "Reading Randomness."

This is that forum: gamblingforums dot com

I did this back on July 20th. It's up and running and people are learning it. But a few of those people trying are actually here at this forum. I'm just looking for validation here. The explanation is already provided. People here like to actually say something with substance. There it is like a wild west shoot-out.

[luckyfella]

Of course not, because if it exists it would be tantamount to posting the HG.

Thanks for posting this.

We are now clear and on the same page.

[luckyfella]

Good, a real question that deserves the respect of a real answer. I have already posted that HG in the full wide open where I have openly answered all questions. It's found in the Roulette section under the title "Reading Randomness."

This is that forum: gamblingforums dot com

I did this back on July 20th. It's up and running and people are learning it. But a few of those people trying are actually here at this forum. I'm just looking for validation here. The explanation is already provided. People here like to actually say something with substance. There it is like a wild west shoot-out.

GizM, I am only aware of your thread today. I stopped reading roulette forums for sometime now. Yes, I will take a look. And thank you.

[Joe]

So I have decided to hand the world the practical application of a yet unknown math that can explain it. The validation comes first.

Gizmo, no need to try to explain the maths of why it works, but I'd like to see the math that it works. I'm a numbers guy; give me some real data. You said your system is destroying the HE, so be specific - how many bets have you made? how many numbers do you bet? how many wins have you had? less waffle, more data please.

[gizmotron2]

Your quest is a difficult one.

You must have a reason for your quest. I don't have any reason. So

I wish you the very best.

Thanks,

It actually started from another person suggesting that a real Holy Grail could be posted in the full wide open and that it would not actually do any damage. I realized that this was the truth. So I posted my findings after 14 years researching the subject and refining and simplifying it. That is what is there now. No more hints here-or-there crud. I take you on the journey of learning it.

What a novelty. Someone is putting everyone to the test by doing the unthinkable. This is really fun while it lasts. I don't have to answer with cryptic clues. I don't need to take any money and then deliver under any pressure to deliver. It's just pure thought provoking experience.

There's this T-shirt my sister got me that says, "I can tell you, but I can't understand it for you."

[gizmotron2]

Gizmo, no need to try to explain the maths of why it works, but I'd like to see the math that it works. I'm a numbers guy; give me some real data. You said your system is destroying the HE, so be specific - how many bets have you made? how many numbers do you bet? how many wins have you had? less waffle, more data please.

You are going to love this answer. My numbers are irrelevant for the time being. There are people here that are putting up numbers that even astound me. They have examples published there that prove that they understand it.

If you want to be that Einstein that floats this across the math world with a paper then learn it. If you have the math skills to explain it then you can be the first. It looks like it takes about two weeks to get the basics.

This is funny. The method is there but the real discussion is here. Isn't the internet fun?

My numbers are a 2 to 1 ratio where 1 to 1 is a rounded expectation under binomial distribution standards. That obliterates all known math. Some here are getting closer to 3 to 1. I suspect that they are far more serious than I am. This is a method that rewards fine scrutiny. The implications to the investment world alone will be staggering. All known research that depends on a part of it being validated thru statistical inference will all come under a new kind of review.

You should go for it. Do you you have a fine German last name?

Joe gets the Nobel Prize.

[luckyfella]

Steve,

I believe Blueprint refers to the known "argument" that to become a 3-times repeater a number has first to be a 2-times repeater etc.
I would agree with you on this one. It is stating the obvious and does not offer a clue on how to use this FACT to our advantage.

Just to be clear, the exact issue is that bolded  and underlined.

[gizmotron2]

GizM, I am only aware of your thread today. I stopped reading roulette forums for sometime now. Yes, I will take a look. And thank you.

It's the wild west there. I have a gun too. So I shoot my mouth off freely. Some of those trolls are actually one person having conversations with themselves under different names. The worst offender is the new owner of betSelection dot cc

[Joe]

My numbers are a 2 to 1 ratio where 1 to 1 is a rounded expectation under binomial distribution standards. That obliterates all known math. Some here are getting closer to 3 to 1.

So that's 2:1 win ratio on an even chance game? Flat bets?

Ok I'm checking out your thread on the other forum. I think your videos are the best way to learn the strategy. BTW, did anyone ever tell you that you sound like Woody Harrelson? 

[gizmotron2]

So that's 2:1 win ratio on an even chance game? Flat bets?

Ok I'm checking out your thread on the other forum. I think your videos are the best way to learn the strategy. BTW, did anyone ever tell you that you sound like Woody Harrelson? 

Funny that. Do you mean like smoking something?

[gizmotron2]

So that's 2:1 win ratio on an even chance game? Flat bets?

Let me explain that. I stop at a win point that is well inside very common variance. I got the idea from this video that somebody posted there a few years ago.

This is information not found there. I adapted this thinking to Roulette and came up with the stop points out of practicality. But I got the idea from the stock market traders to begin with. I just applied reading randomness skills to it and BAMB!

link:s://:.youtube.com/watch?v=bRCtBRsLPmk

[luckyfella]

Just to be clear, the exact issue is that bolded  and underlined.

Read post #1 of this thread. It's right there together with jerome comments.
link:s://:.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=20115.0

It took me more than 1year of research to understand fully the crap that TurboG wrote.

Wtf Turbo to write math of dependency like that. Damn you.

And ofc thanks a lot.

I gave you guys a bone.

One tip from me, don't go down the same path. They don't work.
The rest is up to you.

Repeaters player.
Luckyfella