Over There but Here, Reading Randomness

[gizmotron2]

This is just to be more clear. You cannot predict better than random when a streak will start, trend, or end.

I can't predict when a win streak will start, how long it will last, and when it will end. But I know when my unfunded bet selections are in a losing streak, causing me no harm. I also know when my funded bet selections are in a win streak. This is done by observation of the conditions and has ZERO concern regarding any capability of predicting anything. Please consider my explanation. When people keep asking me this same question I think that perhaps I'm using the wrong language are that words have lost their meaning. It could be a form of blindness where the assumptions being made are the hidden secret truth. Unfortunately there is no way to predict future spins. Since that is the truth, the pursuit of that capability is ludicrous. Let me ask you a question. When will you get off of this search for prediction idea? I have decades of playing experience. You will never beat Roulette with a mathematically based system. You will never gain super powers that allow you to treat the casino as your very own personal ATM machine. All you have is a guess. After that all you have are the results. Try reading the results and playing against the swings of that. You do know that gambling bets go up and down in phases don't you? Try beating the phases of the game as it occurs.

[Richard Meisel]

Hi Gix, concerning your Bet Selection what do you think of Martin J. Silverthorn's Betting Selection with his Super Neural Strategy? Not his Betting Progressions, not his Stops, and not his Targets. Just his Betting Selection.

[gizmotron2]

Martin J. Silverthorn

There is no point for me to consider anyone else's  bet selection methods. They produce times when they work and times when they don't. They have to. All I'm interested in is seeing is the times that I like the most. For me I look at a trend and check to see if that trend is in a phase of working like it is predicting the future. In that case it is winning. So the trends are doing exactly what I want in order to win that session at that time. 30 minutes later they will probably stop working and therefore they will look like they are not predicting anything. That is how I search. So I don't need anyone else's bet selection methods. I have way more characteristics than just domination. I have 6 individual groups to search for with all my main characteristics. It's way more than enough. I just monitor these for the ones that are in a phase of working. I'm already trained in these sets of data. I don't need more data. I don't need any other bet selection categories or groupings. It almost never happens that nothing looks promising. There is almost always a thing that is in a state of continuing. It's just a matter of noticing it and the sizes that it comes in. 

But what the heck. You can go ahead and create or use any bet selection method that you want as long as it shows you the times when it is working and the times when it is not.

[Richard Meisel]

Thank you, Giz, I look for trends that end, that continue, and also are doing nothing, but are doing something because a first time Loss indicates that a winning PATTERN has begun to end. We can use Selection and the proper Timing to beat the casinos. We can seek matching PATTERNS and see formations of continuations of any kind. We can read RANDOMNESS and see TRENDS and the absence of TRENDS and find the "WORKING TREND!" Everything is RANDOM and streaks of favorable outcomes can overcome mathematical probabilities, but only in the short run because in the American Wheel with 37 numbers the exact number of 37 consecutive numbers is 2 to the 37th power. That number is exactly 137,438,953,472, that is over 137 trillion times 37 spins!  My question to you is if I'm only Betting on E/O and my Betting Selection is losing, for instance what comes up is R-B-R-B-R-B-R-B-R-B, do I stop at 4,5,6, or even 7 Losses, not using a Martingale, but a reasonal progression? Looking forward to your reply.

[gizmotron2]

You don't need a progression. You just need to stop if you get to 7 losses. The point is to win enough sessions at 3 for each session lost at 7.  When I see a perfect pattern happening at another location and I'm even in a losing streak I try to get at least one win from it. My basic rule is to not try to force a change. That's a gambler's weakness. You will see a bunch of perfect patterns or trends and you will still lose that session. It's just a perfect pattern of first try losses. It's so rare but it happens. Don't let it rile you. It will happen and it's just a coincidence. You can't win them all. You can try. If you don't get shook up when it happens then you remain in control. You will never see a swarm of good looking trends that end many sessions as losses all in a row. The most I ever saw was three sessions in a row and on different days.

[Richard Meisel]

Thank you for your guidance, Giz, you are probably the only person in this forum I can talk to.

[Richard Meisel]

Giz, where can I buy your roulette software that shows graphs?

[gizmotron2]

Giz, where can I buy your roulette software that shows graphs?

It's free at the site where the main thread is located. It's in the software section. You want the 1.4 version. Look at the link in my signature here. It is a phonetically represented link. You will need to reconstruct it.

[Richard Meisel]

Sorry to bother you, Giz. Went to your Reading RANDOMNESS thread at Gambling Forums. There are 72 pages there. Am I at the right place?

[Richard Meisel]

Just found it, thank you.

[Richard Meisel]

You've done a great study, Giz.  Without going into the math, suffice it to say that RANDOMNESS beats ALL mathematical odds because of its randomness. Random numbers produce STREAKS and CLUSTERS that can be read and intelligently bet on. I know you know this and more; much more on Bet Selection.

[gizmotron2]

You've done a great study, Giz.  Without going into the math, suffice it to say that RANDOMNESS beats ALL mathematical odds because of its randomness. Random numbers produce STREAKS and CLUSTERS that can be read and intelligently bet on. I know you know this and more; much more on Bet Selection.

It goes back 14 years where I first suggested it at Gambler's Glen. To this day a perfect occurring pattern is still considered a kind of heresy against gambling. It's very rare yet it happens. It just takes a person that can see it when it happens. I titled them "Elegant Patterns." Perhaps that alone was enough to have almost the entire world barf up a kidney. I think it is funny to say the least. It's like telling people that there are bags of gold sitting around and all you have to do is notice one and grab it.  The fact that they don't or won't gives the cynical side of my personality extreme pleasure.  It's like all the liberals that won't take Hydroxychloroquine if they get Covid-19. They would rather die than have a chance that that might help them. I mean ... what's so bad about that? They get to die rather than give Trump any break. It's too funny. So a therapeutic needs to pass political correctness in order to get wide spread use. But then that activity kills off the true enemies of freedom. They bunch together in order to wreck entire states here in America. Now that activity is going to kill them. So why not ignore bags of gold too.

[charly]

You've done a great study, Giz.  Without going into the math, suffice it to say that RANDOMNESS beats ALL mathematical odds because of its randomness. Random numbers produce STREAKS and CLUSTERS that can be read and intelligently bet on. I know you know this and more; much more on Bet Selection.

He with his "reading randomness" s.h.i.t  is spamming in all possible forums. His methodology don't work, never worked and never will work.
Have you seen his real gambling? I mean, not a recorded video but a  real gambling in live stream in some online casinos? No!!! Al this is just bla bla bla...brain f.u.c.k.i.n.g useless philosophy.

[gizmotron2]

He with his "reading randomness" s.h.i.t  is spamming in all possible forums. His methodology don't work, never worked and never will work.
Have you seen his real gambling? I mean, not a recorded video but a  real gambling in live stream in some online casinos? No!!! Al this is just bla bla bla...brain f.u.c.k.i.n.g useless philosophy.

If you want to know why I told how all this works openly it is because of charly and people like him. There is nothing more rewarding in life than acquiring a difficult skill and using it to gain a more fulfilled life from that effort. Charly thinks that he or she is saving people from a terrible injustice in this world. But I have explained it all for free. You have nothing to lose because I created software so that you can prove it to yourself at no cost or danger. The real threat here is that Charly could be completely wrong and is trying to move people away from something that actually works. His advice is free also. So try it or forget it. I have gone all the way to showing it to people. Charly is just talking out of his south end. If I'm right then he is a fool. I'm counting on him being seen as a fool. I did this for him and for those mathNazies that are so sure that math is the final word. My disclosures are far beyond the field of gambling. It goes right to the heart of statistics and experimental research methods. I wanted credit for changing what is known. When enough people use their basic human nature and exploit this technique then the academic world will respond to the demand. Charly is an irrelevant pest and nothing more

[charly]

If you want to know why I told how all this works openly it is because of charly and people like him. There is nothing more rewarding in life than acquiring a difficult skill and using it to gain a more fulfilled life from that effort. Charly thinks that he or she is saving people from a terrible injustice in this world. But I have explained it all for free. You have nothing to lose because I created software so that you can prove it to yourself at no cost or danger. The real threat here is that Charly could be completely wrong and is trying to move people away from something that actually works. His advice is free also. So try it or forget it. I have gone all the way to showing it to people. Charly is just talking out of his south end. If I'm right then he is a fool. I'm counting on him being seen as a fool. I did this for him and for those mathNazies that are so sure that math is the final word. My disclosures are far beyond the field of gambling. It goes right to the heart of statistics and experimental research methods. I wanted credit for changing what is known. When enough people use their basic human nature and exploit this technique then the academic world will respond to the demand. Charly is an irrelevant pest and nothing more

Just once show your online gambling on live stream on some online casino. Can you do that?  Or with live stream your stupid method won't work?