Over There but Here, Reading Randomness

[gizmotron2]

On the bet selection website they say you are a conman called Mark who has stolen lots of money 

That's fair. It's one man, not they. I was given $5,000 by a person that was interested in what I was doing with the understanding that I would fly to Macau and be given $50,000 to do some high roller gambling. The person giving the money and I both had self control issues that we were both interested in solving. It took years too solve it too. I did solve it and then posted Reading Randomness in the wide open for free. My name is Mark and it has been well known across many gambling forums as gizmotron and Mark. I charged under $1000 for all the students in the first school. In that first school was my first software charting system. I use to go after the huge win streaks and was prone to digging deep holes waiting for it back then.

I ran a second school for $800 as a private accessed forum. That is where I developed my AI software for double dozens. That software is now free as well. But I found the self control I needed in stop points and minimum win goals after that school was done. I developed new training and practice software to teach it with. That software and training is now free also. So I managed to find a way to get paid a small amount for my computer programming time. Last year I took on one student at $1,000 and spent 120 hours, one on one, training him with the new software. He was the proof to me that I could teach people to break all known knowledge of mathematical house advantage beliefs. I've discovered something earth shattering regarding gambling and I shared it with the world for free. If all that makes me a conman then I'm a conman. The man that was trashing my reputation is in fact a mean and dangerous person that likes to get personal information on others and "DOX" them in public. Last night he was discovered by another at the other website where we found out that this man has 16 convictions for crimes. We have his real name now. We have his picture now. We have his relatives, his bankruptcies, his divorces. We have his failed businesses and we have 33 liens against him. We have the power to DOX him. He was told to take down all the accusations or he would get published in the wide open. That threat worked because of a few hours ago all the stuff against me is gone from his website.

My con is to tell a real working method. What do you have to lose? How far are you getting with progressions and magic beans? The only thing I'm doing to people is using the suspension of disbelief against them as nobody would actually tell a real working Holy Grail.  Believe what you want. I could care less. How many people around get given $5000 with a promise to get $50,000 more. Any of you get that offer any time in the past few years? I have all the transaction emails and can prove everything. Does charging for services and being given an opportunity make me a con man? If so then I feel sorry for you because I use to get millions for construction loans from banks and covered all the loans. I was a building contractor. In your world I was a crook. But you don't actually get my houses unless you pay up. The world is not a free ride, ... until now.

[gizmotron2]

Flat betting with the reading randomness skills is the best way to go. You need a smaller sized bankroll and it will dig holes slower and with not as big of a bight when it does lose a bet. I know the videos use double the bet at times. Getting three net wins is a grinding out the won sessions technique. It is the only thing that is proving the most effective against the single bet house advantage. Timing is everything because virtual bet selections reveal current conditions at no expense. So It's not a flat bet all the time method.

[Herby]

Hi gizmotron,
I tried to test your software, it seems to need a password.
What are the conditions to get the password ?

[gizmotron2]

Hi gizmotron,
I tried to test your software, it seems to need a password.
What are the conditions to get the password ?

It's there at that forum in a bunch of operational pictures. The thread is located at:
Reading Randomness Practice Software 1.4g with graph -- in the Roulette section, not the software section.

You need to be logged in there in order to see the log in for the software. It's shows the process in a picture.

[Herby]

Thanks, it works. 

[gizmotron2]

This is just great. In my opinion Jono1167 has mastered this. He knows what he is doing with it. I just wanted to congratulate him here.

[gizmotron2]

Today is the day. I'm going to rip the lid off of known logic. Today you will see with ease how this works.

Let's go back to when my own eyes were first opened wider. I knew I was already on to winning monster sized win streaks. I also knew that I had self control problems. I didn't mind taking a hit, like a professional boxer does in order to deliver a hit. So I would dig deep holes in every session that I played in. I never had a large enough bankroll to stand in the ring against the casino with my limited bankrolls. The casino has an endless supply bankroll. So it all added up to me having what I call self control issues. I'm going to let you see the video that changed everything for me. Adam Khoo here doesn't even see it. He talks right over the example that changes everything and doesn't even know it. He shows a 10% guessing advantage and does not see this as enough to beat a casino. But I do. I will make a video today that will open everyone's eyes.

So try to keep in mind that for the past 13+ years I have always said that you can use any consistent bet selection to do this or to use this. Here is Adam Khoo's video:

link:s://youtu.be/bRCtBRsLPmk

[gizmotron2]

I have always said that you can use any consistent bet selection to use this method. So let's use Wesley Snipes' suggestion in the "Passenger 57" movie, where he says "always bet on black."

That is all that is needed to explain what I did with Adam Khoo's video idea. Did you know that Gonzalo García-Pelayo and his family marched across Europe and Las Vegas in the early 90's with just a 6% advantage against a house payout disadvantage of 2.7% and made millions, until the casinos caught on that is? Do you know that card counters wait to be in a phase of opportunity to increase their bet values? That is how they take advantage of the casino.

I will now show you a way to capitalize on coincidental changes. You can lose all or more of the bets that are expected to be lost due to common-sense everyday probability formula and still come out way ahead monetarily. If you treat a gambling session as a single event, and do what I suggest, become good at it, then you should be able to get a better over-all take from your gambling sessions than the known expectations of just about everyone on planet earth.

So here is the eye opening video:

link:s://youtu.be/f-BbdPFzn0o

[gizmotron2]

Quote: "You are destined to lose due to the house edge, variance and overall ignorance."

Funny this, but I agree, almost. The notion of a house edge is totally dead. The house only has an edge if you surrender yourself to it. Most gamblers believe that the house's advantage is the real reason that they lose. The casino teaches it. Gambling addiction therapists teach it. It's repeated all over the gambling forums. Math oriented gambling research is all based on it. It is one of the best lies ever believed by mankind. People want there to be something to blame for them losing so they grasp onto this lie. Most people will not give it up no matter what. They are married to it.

If it were true then the corporate earnings reports for table games in corporate owned casinos would reflect this. But they don't The worst table game advantage is 5.26%. But the casinos earnings, after giving away comp points is 17% on average. You can't lie in a yearly earnings report without doing jail time. Ignorance and variance are the true culprits in this game of bait and switch. That space between the ears of a gambler is the real cause for people losing. The casino could play a no-zero game in Roulette, all fair, with no cheating, and I doubt that the casinos would lower their average earnings report percentages.

People need to blame the casino's minor advantage so that they won't blame themselves. It's like getting them to think and smell Philly-Steak while eating a sh*t sandwich. Addicted gamblers are hooked on the chemicals produced in their own bodies to the point that they don't mind losing. It's all about not minding losing. It even happens here in all the gambling forums. People search and test mechanical systems like crash test dummies. They don't mind losing. The key to all this is to get people to not mind losing. It's fun. It's entertainment. These things in life cost money. That is to be expected. The mind of a gambler is a war zone. People do battle even if they don't know it. It's fun to watch each new and crazy system that comes along and how excited people get about it.

Turbo is the master at putting a carrot on a string. People want to believe. That is a battle of the mind too. It could be that he is one of the greatest comedians the world has ever seen or that he is captured by his own amazement as well. But you have to love him for going for it in all these years. All his stuff has a tinge of believable color to it. He's is the master.

With so much garbage out there it is no wonder that I came to believe that I could tell the story of a real working method and it would not have much of an effect on the minds of most people that need an excuse to lose in order to keep them going. It's one thing to lose because you are supposed to. It's quite another to accept that you are actually supposed to win. That's a very tough nut to crack. I'm enjoying watching people crack that nut. I'm also enjoying watching people shy away from it. "We have met the enemy and they are us." -- “Pogo,” by Walt Kelly

[Tinsoldiers]

If it were true then the corporate earnings reports for table games in corporate owned casinos would reflect this. But they don't The worst table game advantage is 5.26%. But the casinos earnings, after giving away comp points is 17% on average. You can't lie in a yearly earnings report without doing jail time.

Dear Gizmo, I may or may not agree to what you are saying otherwise, but the above is the summation of ignorance. Earnings report is no reflection of house edge as both are different things.  See below the explanation so that you can understand. 

If you say casino has some costs for managing their casino, this Is for dealer salary, casino lease, utilitites, taxes etc - for argument sake let’s say 1mn every month. Now if there is less money wagered in a month - let’s say 10Mn and the house edge for argument sake is 5%.  So the casino has earned 500,000 that month.  Net they make a loss.  50%. 

However if there is more money wagered , let’s say 30Mn- with house edge of 5% they make 1.5Mn and after deducting costs they make 1Mn profit.  See the difference between earnings and house edge?

[gizmotron2]

Dear Gizmo, I may or may not agree to what you are saying otherwise, but the above is the summation of ignorance. Earnings report is no reflection of house edge as both are different things.  See below the explanation so that you can understand. 

If you say casino has some costs for managing their casino, this Is for dealer salary, casino lease, utilitites, taxes etc - for argument sake let’s say 1mn every month. Now if there is less money wagered in a month - let’s say 10Mn and the house edge for argument sake is 5%.  So the casino has earned 500,000 that month.  Net they make a loss.  50%. 

However if there is more money wagered , let’s say 30Mn- with house edge of 5% they make 1.5Mn and after deducting costs they make 1Mn profit.  See the difference between earnings and house edge?

That's a nice and pretty story but it's not factual. Earnings from the Table Games only. It's the base value before overhead is taken out.This figure must be shown before the right offs. Comp points attributed to bets placed at these tables are not overhead costs. These reports must show the base value in order to show if the practice is worth keeping. The IRS will not allow the casino to mask its earnings in overhead costs.

[Tinsoldiers]

Can you pls point to one report where it is shown? I don’t want to tell that you are fooling around, but it is in your hands to show one such earnings report. 

[luckyfella]

Governments collect gaming taxes at source based on revenue, mostly players losses.

The highest gaming tax at source is collected from gaming machines followed by lotteries.

[gizmotron2]

Can you pls point to one report where it is shown? I don’t want to tell that you are fooling around, but it is in your hands to show one such earnings report.

It took me less than 5 minutes: Load Q219 Earnings Release

Here: link:s://investor.sands.com/financial-reports/latest-financial-reports/default.aspx

Look at the second quarter of this year. Search for the word "table" 179 million in activity, 20.2% win percentage

The house's advantage is complete bullshit.

[Tinsoldiers]

Ok gizmo. I will leave that there.