Over There but Here, Reading Randomness

[Richard Meisel]

Hi Gix, got your software downloaded, but what do I put in the question box after I press RUN? Thank you.

[thocxo2207]

007 software?

[gizmotron2]

007 software?

I thought it was funny. It's asking if this is spyware as a metaphor.  I came up with a password for my first student that suggested using one. The software does not connect to the internet or store data in any way. You can save results as a text only file. It won't allow you to use your highlight and copy function on purpose. You must use the display Past Sessions and then Save Past buttons. This was all done back with the very first student. Didn't want this out there yet.  It's out there for free now because it's a difficult skill to get good at. Nevertheless, it's still a skill that a few have perfected. It's my joke on human nature. Nobody would freely give away a working skill, method, or system. So they reject it because trends don't always work. Funny that because I'm not the last person on earth to notice that. Part of all this is about learning to use judgment and use good timing. These are not magical concepts.

[Richard Meisel]

Hi Giz, what do I put in the box after RUN?

[winforus]

Gizmontron, so by “reading randomness”, you are saying that there are patterns occurring. And you can read those patterns - similar to Nikola Tesla’s 369, but instead of individual numbers, in groups. In this case, you are not reading random, because there is no such thing as random in the first place, otherwise you wouldn’t even be able to read it.

How has that worked out in practice? Are you winning with this consistently in casinos?

[gizmotron2]

Hi Giz, what do I put in the box after RUN?

You put the number of spins you would like to just run, typically before you start making bet selections. It's also a way to chart a ton of spins and just look at the charts for learning characteristics.

[gizmotron2]

Gizmontron, so by “reading randomness”, you are saying that there are patterns occurring. And you can read those patterns - similar to Nikola Tesla’s 369, but instead of individual numbers, in groups. In this case, you are not reading random, because there is no such thing as random in the first place, otherwise you wouldn’t even be able to read it.

How has that worked out in practice? Are you winning with this consistently in casinos?

I just wrote this there. Frankly it's all you deserve. I have explained everything already at that other forum. I only want to write the explanation once.

Personally, I can't think of anything worse than losing a parleyed bet. It really messes with your head than you have just turned a positive into a negative.

As for dominant side, this is all after the event observations. You do know there is no-correlational between the next hand and last series of hands? Observing a score board is like looking at the past, it's gone, it may or may not continue, each time it does, equally it won't :D

"Right on point. If anyone is going to learn anything from betting on the continuation of a trend or pattern they should learn how to live with just one or at most two flat bet wins. Everything ends and almost always sooner rather than later. Just take the one win from a trend. It's more than enough. If you can get just three net wins advantage you are doing great for a session. People just can't figure that out though."

[Clf7]

I just wrote this there. Frankly it's all you deserve. I have explained everything already at that other forum. I only want to write the explanation once.

"Right on point. If anyone is going to learn anything from betting on the continuation of a trend or pattern they should learn how to live with just one or at most two flat bet wins. Everything ends and almost always sooner rather than later. Just take the one win from a trend. It's more than enough. If you can get just three net wins advantage you are doing great for a session. People just can't figure that out though."

Do you have your own winning method? And are you winning with it (like pro playing for a living)?

[huskerdu]

If anyone is going to learn anything from betting on the continuation of a trend or pattern they should learn how to live with just one or at most two flat bet wins. Everything ends and almost always sooner rather than later. Just take the one win from a trend. It's more than enough. If you can get just three net wins advantage you are doing great for a session

I absolutely agree with this statement.
The problem is that it is difficult to figure out when a trend starts and stops.
And when you'll catch  the trend you will just try to recover the loses from the previous unsuccessful tries.
Because randomness kills also this kind of play.

[Steve]

The trend might continue. You might bet and win, then stop, thinking your system worked.

Or you could stop, and avoid distaster, thinking your system saved you.

Or you can win lots, thinking your system is awesone.

The truth is your system changed nothing. You can either be lucky or unlucky. The odds didn't change. You've just fooled yourself.

[Richard Meisel]

You can either be lucky or unlucky. The odds didn't change.

Steve, I personally do not believe in luck or unluck. How can God get any Glory if you believe in luck? And as for the odds that say any previous Spins will not influence the present Spin, I just cannot believe this. But you'll probably say that the present Spin has a 1/37 or 1/38 chance of happening. True. But take a look at the past 38 Spins and look at all the Even Bets (R/B - E/O - H/L) and the 3 Dozens and the 3 Columns {there are others also but just these here), and look at the Trends and the Clusters and the Singles and the Doubles and the Triples and the Weak Side and the Strong Side, etc. Now looking at them all on one sheet decide where you would have Bet (say you choose about 7 Bets), and find out for yourself if you would have Won or Lost. I predict you would have Won with these Guesses because they were EDUCATED guesses. So I believe that the Past most certainly affects the Now and the Future even though the chance is still 1/37 or 1/38. Now Giz likes to get 3 Wins before 7 Losses, but I prefer 2 Wins before 5 Losses. But if you want to spend a lot of time at the Wheel I do have a nice Method as probably most of the Roulette players have. There are a tremendous amount of Systems and Methods of playing Roulette listed many places on the internet.

[gizmotron2]

The problem is that it is difficult to figure out when a trend starts and stops.
And when you'll catch  the trend you will just try to recover the loses from the previous unsuccessful tries.
Because randomness kills also this kind of play.

That goes to the point of Reading Randomness. If you are in a session that is just grinding away then you are not in a win streak session.  It takes a lot of playing experience to learn to recognize the different types of sessions, the speed of changes, the duration of mini streaks, the actual characteristic of the currently occurring session. It takes a lot of experience so that you don't jump to impulsive conclusions and then make bad moves. The better you are at seeing what is happening to your bet selections the easier it is to use this method. I got this from the very rare ultra extreme skiing world. The steeper it gets the less energy it takes to control the descent. But the steeper it gets the greater are the consequences if you make a mistake. First you must be an expert before you can see how easy it is. This is true of reading randomness. You must be looking at the results of your moves and how the terrain changes. If you try to get ahead of yourself with wishful thinking then all that planning will blow up in your face. This is why people can't use trends to win. They anticipate what they want and then project that into their decisions. It's ignorance. And after getting killed they conclude that it does not work. It takes self control and the ability to command your will strategically. Everyone can't be a prize fighter. How hard are you willing to work your brain?  You have your reason to quit. So use it. You have just successfully failed. Nice going. You set out to lose once again. This is so common. If you want to set out to win then you must really get the education that it takes. I invented all this from nothing and without guidance. That includes taking hits while knowing that it works. You have a road map and the ability to not have to take decades of bad mistakes along the way. If you can't figure it out with all this then the world is just a facsinating place full of people that only want an easy path in life. I never took the easy path.

Don't blame the nature of trends when it's your ability to live with common ordinary changes that are not natural. Trends are only good for you if you know how to catch them and practically hang on to them. That comes specifically from playing experience. They are never a magic panacea.

[gizmotron2]

The trend might continue. You might bet and win, then stop, thinking your system worked.

Or you could stop, and avoid distaster, thinking your system saved you.

Or you can win lots, thinking your system is awesone.

The truth is your system changed nothing. You can either be lucky or unlucky. The odds didn't change. You've just fooled yourself.

Knowing what I know I just suspect that it is you Steve that are fooling yourself. But you might need to believe what you think is the truth. You need trends to not work.  Seeing a trend changes nothing. It can't predict the next outcome. But at times trends dominate as a pattern that keeps repeating. This occurs long enough to get just one net win from it. People don't play Roulette just to win one battle at a time.  They play with some wishful thinking that will eventually change their lives. Everyone wants a progression that works like magic. Heck, even those that buy your computers want that activity to change their lives. The real battle is the space between your ears. I know when I'm in a cluster of the same trend characteristic. I know how to turn that into a massive win streak. I don't need to know when it will end. I just need to see when it ends and adjust accordingly. Everyone wants to put down trends because they don't predict the future. It's always funny, that argument. Of course it does not predict the future. Get past it please.  It doesn't launch battle ships or fly to Mars either.  It's just people taking a straw man stand. Trends don't predict the future. So why does it need to? That question never gets asked or answered. Why do you need trends to predict the future?

[gizmotron2]

Do you have your own winning method? And are you winning with it (like pro playing for a living)?

I have far more knowledge on this topic than I have disclosed in the thread. I have decades of playing experience regarding changes and winning and losing streaks. I can't teach experience. All I can do is hand people the road map to gain that experience. You asking me if I'm a pro is actually you searching for confidence or evidence of validation. Here is your answer to that from me. Take the information, perfect the skill needed to execute the strategies, and give yourself unequivocal validation. Or, on the other hand, you can wait for the consensus to give you that validation after it becomes too late. It is my goal to get the math oriented absolutist to be in the latter group. If that gobbles up the naturally cynical and skeptical I don't really care much. People are good at saying they should have jumped on this or that when they had a chance. Could be a trend people like to bet on.

[Richard Meisel]

You put the number of spins you would like to just run, typically before you start making bet selections. It's also a way to chart a ton of spins and just look at the charts for learning characteristics.

Hi Giz, I downloaded your Even Chance Pro 1.4 With Graphs and when I push RUN, a box comes up and asks: "What is the question?". Whatever I put in the box won't allow me to use your program.