• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

Every system can win in the short-term. It just depends on the spins you play.

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

New insight

Started by Theoldsoul, Sep 15, 07:54 PM 2019

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 7 Guests are viewing this topic.

Joe

Quote from: Let Me Win on Sep 17, 04:29 PM 2019Maya, (Sanskrit: “magic” or “illusion”) a fundamental concept in Hindu philosophy, notably in the Advaita (Nondualist) school of Vedanta. Maya originally denoted the magic power with which a god can make human beings believe in what turns out to be an illusion.

"everything is MAYA"

Well, not everything can be maya (illusion) because "everything" includes the statement "everything is MAYA", and so the philosophy would undermine itself. And there must be something other than illusion otherwise  we couldn't call it "illusion", as compared to reality.
Logic. It's always in the way.

Let Me Win

I've read this argument before.

The answer is and I'm still learning as I only discovered MAYA through quantum physics...

Not that everything is an illusion in the sense that it does not exist it's more that what we are seeing and experiencing how it appears to us is not the true reality.

Some example such as we see a traffic light turn red.
It looks instant to us but really we are seeing things in the past due to the time it takes for the light to reach our eyes and our brains to process that.


Andre Chass

This is the most nonsense thread I've ever seen.  :o
Nothing ventured, nothing gained...

Andre Chass

Quote from: Theoldsoul on Sep 17, 06:48 PM 2019
pay 2000 dollars for metaphysical and spiritual growth in addition to advanced roulette approachs of course.
<a href="link:s://ibb.co/9rKqKQ1">

Lol
Nothing ventured, nothing gained...

Taotie

Quote from: Andre Chass on Sep 18, 03:10 AM 2019
This is the most nonsense thread I've ever seen.  :o


Oh, I don't know. Some of your threads have been right up there.  :xd:

Steve

Quote from: Theoldsoul on Sep 17, 09:56 PM 2019Why do I keep offending people, the energy of this forum is really weird.

F*CK YOU.

Wtf u talking about???
"The only way to beat roulette is by increasing the accuracy of predictions"
Roulettephysics.com ← Professional roulette tips
Roulette-computers.com ← Hidden electronics that predicts the winning number
Roulettephysics.com/roulette-strategy ← Why most systems lose

Joe

Quote from: Let Me Win on Sep 18, 02:51 AM 2019Not that everything is an illusion in the sense that it does not exist it's more that what we are seeing and experiencing how it appears to us is not the true reality.

Some example such as we see a traffic light turn red.
It looks instant to us but really we are seeing things in the past due to the time it takes for the light to reach our eyes and our brains to process that.

But there is no unreality in what "appears", and two aspects of reality doesn't mean that one is false. To take your example, just because the light appears to our eyes to turn red instantly doesn't mean it's an illusion, because it's also a reality that light can't travel instantaneously; the only "unreality" is us not taking this into account. Just because our understanding of reality is limited at the current time (and probably always will be) is no basis for assuming that "everything is Maya". Before science, humans explained events in terms of magic and gods, and unfortunately there is still a tendency to do that.
Logic. It's always in the way.

Roulettebeater

Quote from: Joe on Sep 20, 06:30 AM 2019
But there is no unreality in what "appears", and two aspects of reality doesn't mean that one is false. To take your example, just because the light appears to our eyes to turn red instantly doesn't mean it's an illusion, because it's also a reality that light can't travel instantaneously; the only "unreality" is us not taking this into account. Just because our understanding of reality is limited at the current time (and probably always will be) is no basis for assuming that "everything is Maya". Before science, humans explained events in terms of magic and gods, and unfortunately there is still a tendency to do that.

Go on like that , nice lecture !
How should the average person translate this into workable idea in terms of roulette ?
A dollar won is twice as sweet as as a dollar earned

Let Me Win

I am a fully paid up athiest my understanding of MAYA is very scientific.

When you look at Milk 🥛 you see white liquid but really it's a bunch of atoms.

This is the Maya.

Joe

Quote from: Let Me Win on Sep 20, 09:07 AM 2019When you look at Milk 🥛 you see white liquid but really it's a bunch of atoms.

It doesn't make sense to say the glass of milk is "really" a bunch of atoms. The two descriptions are not mutually exclusive, but just two views or aspects of the one reality. If the glass of milk that we see and drink and the bunch of atoms were mutually exclusive, it would mean that the latter was real and the former imaginary, but the glass of milk has to exist (as a glass of milk) otherwise no bunch of atoms would exist. No glass of milk means no bunch of atoms and the atoms cannot exist independently of some form (whether it be a glass of milk, a human being, or a galaxy). Just because we see the atoms structured in a certain way doesn't mean the structure itself is "unreal".

Niels Bohr's interpretation of quantum mechanics is just one of many.
link:s://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interpretations_of_quantum_mechanics

Einstein disagreed with him when he famously said "God doesn't play dice". 

Logic. It's always in the way.

Let Me Win

Let me ponder the milk for a while  :)

But to quote Hawking... "Thus it seems Einstein was doubly wrong when he said, God does not play dice. Not only does God definitely play dice, but He sometimes confuses us by throwing them where they can't be seen."

link:://:.hawking.org.uk/does-god-play-dice.html


The Einstein and Bohr debate was settled in Bhor's favour by John Bell (Bell's theorem).

Blueprint

Quote from: MoneyT101 on Sep 16, 08:25 PM 2019
I knew your math knowledge increased with reading all those books but you went above and beyond to different levels 😅

Thanks for posting again...

Hope this will share some new ideas with some and also correct me if I am wrong

So in my journey what I noticed when I combined things... my mindset shifted from trying to win each time to trying to win overall.


So my idea was if I can play a combination in which I can win where either point meets.

If I’m playing Game A and game B...

I don’t care which game wins as long as I’m in profit when either game wins

So that’s the idea I’m picking up from your explanation also

So when you put it like that; it’s a matter of how do you apply the units correctly to create this new game

Are you pointing to game theory payoffs here?

Blueprint

Another thing, I know a lot of you get caught up on dependencies (me, too) so something to consider. 

There are TWO forms of dependencies.

Play around with "numbers" - what dependencies can you or have you come up with.

And play around with fruits and veggies - what dependencies still hold.






Blueprint

Great collaborative effort here! 

See ya.  Be on the lookout for a compiled version of EVERYTHING that has been shared in book form. 

Good luck all.


Blueprint

Oh, and 100% will be donated to a charity of my choice. 

Later.

-