Step In To My Game

[Blood Angel]

Hi,

I’d like to ask if the stats mentioned so far hold true on RNG or is it just real wheel?

Cheers
BA

[MoneyT101]

Hi,

I’d like to ask if the stats mentioned so far hold true on RNG or is it just real wheel?

Cheers
BA

Either It doesn’t matter as long as the results are random.

What I mean is you can put numbered papers 0-36 in a bag and pull a number out and put it back after each result.

The stats will hold.... it doesn’t matter how you get the numbers just need them to be random.

[Blood Angel]

Either It doesn’t matter as long as the results are random.

What I mean is you can put numbered papers 0-36 in a bag and pull a number out and put it back after each result.

The stats will hold.... it doesn’t matter how you get the numbers just need them to be random.

Thank you.

[MoneyT101]

You see those cycles of dozens. Imagine each of those set of unique numbers within a dozen has a statistic quality associated with it.  What if those statistic qualities give us an advantage something along the lines of below. 

Dozen 1 is no longer 12 numbers but it is 14 numbers.  Dozen 2 is no longer 12 numbers but 16 numbers. Dozen 3 is no longer 12 numbers but 6 numbers. But the payouts don't change. All the dozens still give you 2 to 1.

That's the target you need to work on.

Many routes to play, you just need one...This reference pri made is a system in itself.  I will not answer questions about game play.  Its easy to read and understand the references reading the old post.

I dont put the exact spins cause 200 is to many but i can send the exact spins that gave me this results if anyone wants to test them.

Results with 200 random spins using randbetween(1,36) and betting on dozens

Cycles 117
Same 85
Different 32

Cycle 1 - 52
Cycle 2 - 47
Cycle 3 - 18

Bets placed   126
Bets won   60
   
Bets at  -1   120
Bets at -2   6
   
Won bets -1   55
Won bets -2   5

Total Profit 48 units flatbet.....29 units flatbet by spin 100

Dillon, this post is for you!

[donik7777]

Cycle 1 - 52
Cycle 2 - 47
Cycle 3 - 18

This stat little different from 33%-44%-22%

[donik7777]

   
Bets at  -1   120
Bets at -2   6
   
Won bets -1   55
Won bets -2   5

Sorry Money T i didn't get what means -1 and -2

[MoneyT101]

This stat little different from 33%-44%-22%

The stats for these 200 spins were

44%
40%
15%

[MoneyT101]

Sorry Money T i didn't get what means -1 and -2

-1 means I was only betting 1 dozen
-2 means I was betting on two dozens

So I had 120 bets on 1 dozen and 6 bets on 2 dozens for a total of 126 bets placed in 200 spins

I won 55 bets on 1 dozen and 5 bets on 2 dozens for a total of 60 won bets out of 126 placed bets

[MoneyT101]

I’m glad to see a few ppl are understanding the message.

If you already know dozen 1 will win.  2 units to each line or 4 units to each street wouldn’t be so bad.  But think... how can i win a little more.  Maybe some sort of combination

Just look at what happens.  You don’t need to make things up.  Just look and decide

Ati - You are right and perfect. Now the follow up question that one should ask is we can clearly see there are imperfections here. Is there a potential for us to modify the bet sizes across these positions instead of 1 unit bet uniform to create an edge? I will let you ponder on that.

[RiseAgainst]

If you already know dozen 1 will win.

You really wanted to express the statement like this? Because then i hardly disagree with that, no statistic or with any limitation that you will construct your game you will be able to know that. Not for the next spin or the next x amount of spins.

[MoneyT101]

You really wanted to express the statement like this? Because then i hardly disagree with that, no statistic or with any limitation that you will construct your game you will be able to know that. Not for the next spin or the next x amount of spins.

I apologize if my message offended you or anyone.  But my message went over your head!

Yes you are correct no statistic or anything I can think of will force dozen 1 to be the result.  I agree with you 100%.  But that wasn’t the point of my message.  I worded it like that for a reason.

[Herby]

RRR, BBB, RBR, RBB, BRB, BRR

Just for completeness 2 more figures:  RRB   BBR

[luckyfella]

This is also an interesting one, because while it's true, no one can beat the no zero, no house edge roulette. So I prefer to say it's not beatable, because of the unpredictable variances.

Zero and variance wrecks havoc to all systems, we all know that.

The extra green zero pocket gives the casino the house edge due to the unfair payout.

Think of a game where zero has little impact or zero will not affect the result.

Variance is the bigger killer. Therefore, we invert the table where without variance you lose, with variance you win. The larger the variance the bigger your win.

The statistics you collate is good information. The meaning behind those stats is more important. Most people have no idea what they mean.

This is a math problem. To solve this puzzle you have to think like a mathematician.

[Steve]

Therefore, we invert the table where without variance you lose, with variance you win. The larger the variance the bigger your win.

How on Earth can you do that? What you said is as incorrect as saying "When we've got no idea, we'll make ourselves have even less idea, therefore we'll WIN"

Uncertainty is uncertainty. You can't make certainty from uncertainty.

This is a math problem. To solve this puzzle you have to think like a mathematician.

It's not really a math problem. Math is just an expression of the problem.

Say you wanted 3 apples, but only had 2 apples. This isnt a math problem. You just dont have enough apples.

Saying it's a math problem, then saying "you can beat math with math" is a really bad and incorrect thing to say. But that phrase is thrown around forums like it has substance.

The problem of beating roulette is actually quite simple: increase the accuracy of predictions.

Once you understand WHY this is the case, the question is then HOW. And there are various ways we already know works. And if you dont like them, start by looking at new ways.

[luckyfella]

How on Earth can you do that?

I know full well it sounds insane.

Find the how.