Theories, Myths, Facts And Ideas

[MoneyT101]

To the point.

But why are you assuming that we have to create a betting decision based on past spins. Creating a decision based on this is again absurd, as we all know it doesn’t work and no one can predict.

You have got two dependent streams, what is stopping you from doing a fixed templatized bet on these streams instead.  A thought, or as Mick would prefer an idea.

Thanks for seeing something... I actually thought you would be one of the ppl against me on this 😅

[Tinsoldiers]

Thanks for seeing something... I actually thought you would be one of the ppl against me on this 😅

I am not for or against.  Am still waiting for an answer on my last question from you . 

[MoneyT101]

I am not for or against.  Am still waiting for an answer on my last question from you .

Which question exactly?

[luckyfella]

You have got two dependent streams, what is stopping you from doing a fixed templatized bet on these streams instead.  A thought, or as Mick would prefer an idea.

Ofc you can.

The purpose ?

[Tinsoldiers]

The purpose ?

Purpose is to find a fixed templatized bet that is taking into consideration all the outcomes that is possible and have a solution for the same, so that for a fixed number of spins you always end up in the positive, for all possible combination of these dependent streams.

I don’t think such a fixed template exists, but theoretically that seems the only way ahead, as we clearly know past doesn’t have any influence on future spins.


And Money, this was the question.

According to me This “somehow” doesn’t exist.  If it doesn’t exist LLN is still going to come in. Do you agree?

[luckyfella]

I don’t think such a fixed template exists, but theoretically that seems the only way ahead,

I found no reason to explore this road.

as we clearly know past doesn’t have any influence on future spins.

I had a closed mind, super sure until ...

[Tinsoldiers]

No puzzles pls.

[Still]

At least you don't write stupid math on forum.

I emphasize skills in Excel once it's understood that the house has a mathematical advantage something like 37 (or 38)  of theirs to 36 of yours plus LaPartage rules and the supposed independence of spins.

You'll need Excel to disprove the independence of spins theorem short of Einstein level math skills. 

You only need enough math to manipulate Excel to produce scientific results.

Otherwise the harangue to learn math is a vague kind of smoke and mirrors...something to hide behind.

Excel or Einstien. Choose.

[Blueprint]

Excel or Einstien. Choose.

Einstein.  Only always.

[luckyfella]

Otherwise the harangue to learn math is a vague kind of smoke and mirrors...something to hide behind.

Excel or Einstien. Choose.

The reason why I kept bringing up this learn your math repeatedly is this error, mistakes and misunderstanding is real. Just read the posts on this thread. If you can't see them your math is just as bad.

Ability to code is not the same as understanding math. If you think both of them are the one and the same, my call to learn math is appropriate. Proper knowledge of math is more important than the skill to code. Although coding skill is necessary to assist in big data test work. My previous post highlighted this point.

Your smoke on mirrors comment carry more weight if you show better math knowledge. At least get your basics right.

If you make proper math related post, I will respond. Else you can continue enjoy your wordy sarcasm with no response from me.

[luckyfella]

No puzzles pls.

If you think no such fixed template exist, and

more importantly, you believe in there is no possibility that spins are not independent,

It means that you have to conclude systems bet is a 100% sure loser.

It only make sense, that discussion, analysis or test work is no more relevant.

[Still]

Einstein.  Only always.

Ok well it was Einstein at his level of math that said you can't beat the wheel. 

Likely there is no newer math that says you can and if so Luckyfeller is not at that level.

What is new since Einstein are spreadsheets and programming languages available to anyone with basic math and basic algebra experience.

If your going to find a way to beat the wheel that is the path you must go. Otherwise you are probably hiding something.  Standing next to a math statue cannot give anyone enough authority by association to hide basic ignorance.

[luckyfella]

Likely there is no newer math that says you can and if so Luckyfeller is not at that level.

This bolded is true.

What is new since Einstein are spreadsheets and programming languages available to anyone with basic math and basic algebra experience.

If your going to find a way to beat the wheel that is the path you must go.

Coders with their coding skills are over-rating their ability to achieve.

I repeat, if you steadfastly believe in the spins are independent, no amount of coding skill will change this that you believe in. That's the obvious contradiction I point out so many times. Yet you fail to understand this basic math.

Moving on from this. Not wasting any more time.

[luckyfella]

 This discussion has deteriorated to focus on the person. Instead of the topic of discussion.

If you check Still posting history, he did the same thing in the past. History repeats itself.

I want no part of this. Enjoy yourself, have fun.

[Still]

This discussion has deteriorated to focus on the person. Instead of the topic of discussion.

If you check Still posting history, he did the same thing in the past. History repeats itself.

I want no part of this. Enjoy yourself, have fun.

Checking my history would reveal I have unofficially moderated two to four cases of unbridled hubris that went beyond annoying. If you would not bring attention to yourself I would not call you out.  You should just talk about the math or just reference the Wizard Of Odds...whose math says the game can't be beaten as is.