Theories, Myths, Facts And Ideas

[MoneyT101]

Start with the hole. 🤪

😂😂😂

Using lines 1234566

1🕳🐦
2🕳🐦
3🕳🐦
4🕳🐦
5🕳🐦
6🕳🐦🐦

[MoneyT101]

I dont know what you are asking to contribute...

I understand your statement about spins vs. cycles or groups. Pri also talked about that.

If you got 2 choices. Black and red.
Group them into 3 results.
Now it will take never more than 9 groups for a group to repeat.

If we do this with 3 choices. Say dozens.
Group them into 3 results
Now it will take never more than 27 groups for a group to repeat.

If i remember correctly...

Contribute anything really.  We are just investigating topics and sharing different point of views.

Yea pri did talk about that...

Ec combined into 3 spins( 8(24) combinations) max repeat 27 spins

Dozens combined into 3 spins(27 combinations)  max repeat 30 spins

You can also combine spins how I did in my example(2-4 post back) to make more events that happen at the same time. To create faster repeats using same spin count

[Tinsoldiers]

It is possible that we are not understanding what you are trying to say. Don’t get tired if you want to get the point across.

This is what you posted as an example.

i run all 3 methods at the same time

method 1.....spins 12,34,56 -consecutive
method 2.....spins 24,46,78 - even
method 3.....spins 13,57,9/11 -odd

Now what does 34, 56 etc mean.  What does 9/11 mean here. I don’t understand. May be others follow.

[mickavelli]

but if a bet is dependent on the result of another bet you can avoid some of the losses before betting

I often wondered things like this with VDW
For example if you observe spin 1 of the finite 9 spins and play for the opposite on spin 2 and you lose, you now get your first A.P opportunity on spin 3.
If the A.P does not form on spin 3, it will not be possible to form on combinations - 2,3,4 or 1,3,5
Meaning future combinations become dependent on what also comes from spin 4
But it's possible you may already have a plan or a chops and changes game in play and get your win on spin 4
So definately i think certain bets can be dependent on future bets
Just depends on your game plan

[mickavelli]

Who around here has played around with betting plans and combinations around VDW??
Be interested to read into it

[Tinsoldiers]

All you are trying to do is introduce multiple games in parallel. What difference does it make if you bet on 500 outcomes in one spin or 500 spins. LLN will still come into picture.

Unless you have a way of playing roulette like Money was explaining where you get one shot to play two numbers with odds still at 1:37 which is not possible in a practical situation as you will always be playing for 2:37.  In the example where you are combining RRR etc, you are in essence playing for 1:8 instead of 1:2 and hence it is natural to get the results they are talking about.

[MoneyT101]

It is possible that we are not understanding what you are trying to say. Don’t get tired if you want to get the point across.

This is what you posted as an example.

Now what does 34, 56 etc mean.  What does 9/11 mean here. I don’t understand. May be others follow.

This was just an idea on making a result dependent on another result. 

But the numbers are the spins and which spins to combine

Spin 1 & spin 2
Spin 3 & spin 4
Spin 9 & spin 11
Etc

[MoneyT101]

Who around here has played around with betting plans and combinations around VDW??
Be interested to read into it

If you see the crazy stuff I tried to come up with using vdw or the idea of combining spins 😂

I went as far as wanting to place bets ahead of time to catch a future repeat  😳

Example: Like bet spin 1 in advance aiming for the repeat that happens with spin 1 & spin 4 & spin 7

But since you know spin 1 is responsible for 3 results you place 3 units on it in advance 😂😂

My brain was frying with the thinking I was attempting to make this bet possible 😂😂😂

I had a headache for months 😂

Sh*t talking about it makes me want to try it again 😂😂😂😂😂

[Tinsoldiers]

This was just an idea on making a result dependent on another result. 

The devil is always in the details. How does that combining help you is what am not able to understand. You can ofcourse combine two EC to see as one bet. But that is automatically going to become 1:4 bet which has its own disadvantages.

[mickavelli]

Sh*t talking about it makes me want to try it again 😂😂😂😂😂

lol mate... Intellectual stimulation👍

[MoneyT101]

The devil is always in the details. How does that combining help you is what am not able to understand. You can ofcourse combine two EC to see as one bet. But that is automatically going to become 1:4 bet which has its own disadvantages.

In the way I explained it... you still bet 1 time (50/50).  You just use the first result to confirm if the bet is playable.

The idea is to make a result dependent on another.  But you don’t have to use this.. it’s just me throwing ideas

[MoneyT101]

lol mate... Intellectual stimulation👍

Hahaah I can’t head down that road again 🥴🤒

[MoneyT101]

If the A.P does not form on spin 3, it will not be possible to form on combinations - 2,3,4 or 1,3,5
Meaning future combinations become dependent on what also comes from spin 4

Exactly... you already know which combinations have a possibility of forming or not forming

Now combine this same idea with cycles... let’s say within a cycle you can have an idea if it will win or lose.  Look at my method 1/method 2/method 3 example.

Is it possible to already have an idea?

Btw you don’t need this!  It’s just ideas to make things different and fun. This isn’t needed to win and things don’t have to be complicated.

[Joe]

So Joe is correct no dependency in each spin!  That is a fact!  I can’t deny that! I agree.

But Joe is talking about apples and I am talking about oranges.  His statement on apples is true and no denying it.  But his statement on oranges is wrong and needs to be investigated.

Which was my statement about oranges? You agreed with me that there can be no dependency between spins.

[mickavelli]

The way i see it from your explanation....
The decision to bet on a future spin combination is based on a previous result that is an already predetermined betting combination.. So based on the previous result, our predetermined betting combination has a bet or it doesnt.. But the way you have constructed it we have overlapping bets between the rows and columns! Really interesting!