Theories, Myths, Facts And Ideas

[MoneyT101]

They make assumptions but because they don't know how to properly test them or even understand what it is that they should be testing, the assumptions are never tested. They then assume that because their ideas seem to 'work', the assumptions must be true.

Some ideas you don’t even need to assume.  You can look at the fact and it can be clear as day.

[MoneyT101]

I didn't say any of those people were scammers, although they may be for all I know.

Everyone can send me money

PayPal, cashapp, Venmo, deposit into my account. I will be adding bitcoin soon

No checks please   

😂

[Blueprint]

Summary so far for anyone following:

Lots of theories.
Lots of myths.
Few facts.
0 new ideas.

[MoneyT101]

keeps saying everyone is fixated on the next spin and we should look at sequences of spins. But a sequence of spins is made up of single spins, and if you can't get an advantage on one spin then you won't get an advantage on a sequence; a sequence doesn't have some magical properties which aren't present in a single spin.

You understand apples but not oranges.

Stick with apples my friend.  Oranges aren’t for you 🍎🍊

Everyone else oranges aren’t so bad😋

[MoneyT101]

Summary so far for anyone following:

Lots of theories.
Lots of myths.
Few facts.
0 new ideas.

Yes by far my favorite post.  Nothing to see here...

Let’s move along 😋🍊

[Blueprint]

We all know why you’re posting.

My advice - use this time to play instead of posting.

I know you won’t listen though. So much for the open mind life lessons.

[MoneyT101]

We all know why you’re posting.

My advice - use this time to play instead of posting.

I know you won’t listen though. So much for the open mind life lessons.

These silly theories/facts/ideas have come to an end. Thank you all for participating.  You can continue without me. Moving forward no more post from me on what has been spoken of in this or anything I have posted in the past.

I’m just your regular roulette forum poster playing martingale on FTL 😆

[Blueprint]

I’m just your regular roulette forum poster playing martingale on FTL 😆

Finally some facts!

[MoneyT101]

Finally some facts!

How dumb of me to think I can fool you?!
🤦‍â™,️😩

[Joe]

Some ideas you don’t even need to assume.  You can look at the fact and it can be clear as day.

You would think that about independence of spins, wouldn't you? It's so obvious it hardly needs pointing out, and yet most systems are predicated on its opposite. 

[Joe]

0 new ideas

There is plenty of scope for new ideas, but when they're built on really dumb ideas, they have no value.

[redhot]

We all know why you’re posting.

Why would that be? 

[MoneyT101]

Why would that be? 

Yes I would love to hear the answer to that 👂

[MoneyT101]

There is plenty of scope for new ideas, but when they're built on really dumb ideas, they have no value.

You know it all and nothing new to learn.  I wish I was as smart as you 🍎🍊

[Tinsoldiers]

You would think that about independence of spins, wouldn't you? It's so obvious it hardly needs pointing out, and yet most systems are predicated on its opposite. 

I think everyone who is posting knows about the independence of spins. It will continue to be a good discussion if we discuss beyond working out a winning method and focus on the basics and the facts and assumptions. Guess it’s not going to happen, as every thread started goes to someone wanting to establish as a messiah. 

Money has been giving contradicting views about the facts that he has established earlier and can’t provide an example to substantiate what he is thinking. Example he has provided even the lAst one on the repeaters and stopping ahead, clearly contradicts the LLN example that he provided earlier by logging bets under different columns. 

Joe regarding the links you gave it doesn’t say anything about the two dependence examples that were discussed. What’s your opinion on those examples.

Similarly, luckyfella, you stated something and stopped and jumped on to something else.  You care to finish your sentence which you ended by saying “until”? And your opinion on fancy betting template - LOL, I was suggesting an alternative to look at during the brainstorming, that doesn’t mean am vouchcing for one.

Once again, it was an interesting discussion - but guess there was no common intention - the goals for everyone participating was different. It would still be good if we leave out the winning method part and discuss the math behind it.