Theories, Myths, Facts And Ideas

[ozon]

Thanks Kav to promote my post.
Unfortunately, these topics will not lead to anything, because no one really wants to share the edge on open forum.
I will say simply, using the strategy I presented with hit n run for one session gives some strange positive results.
I still don't get it. If we start sessions on 1 spin and play up to 30 spins, we have better results and smaller drowdawn than we would play in the flow of numbers.
WHAT I understand by flow of numbers, playing sesion after sesion with tracking, worst EC numbers.
My test was on RS, and alweys start session on 1 spin, but you will use live spins in continuity, the results are worse.
Why?

[falkor2k15]

OK, I think I've finally sussed out how to work with multiple repeat front runners and tame LLN! 

Let's say we've got 3 outcomes on the dozen cycles (tally below). There's more chance of a repeat compared to 3 uniques showing:

020 or 200 or 002

When 3 uniques do show then it's a sign that LLN is kicking in:

111

Now, if we keep playing then we will fall into LLN's trap that has begun to pull us in with 111. So what do we do?

Well, perhaps we should switch to playing lines, numbers or something else instead of the dozen events?

No! I think there's a better way... We need to wait out LLN till it's strength begins to fade and the tides turn back to the repeat:

001 101 111 112 212 222 322 332 432

Now we can start playing again...

110 120
011 021
020
110 120
011 012
002
101 201
101 102
101 201
200
101 201
200
200
110 210
110 111 211 311
110 111 112 113
002

[luckyfella]

OK, I think I've finally sussed out how to work with multiple repeat front runners and tame LLN! 

Let's say we've got 3 outcomes on the dozen cycles (tally below). There's more chance of a repeat compared to 3 uniques showing:

020 or 200 or 002

When 3 uniques do show then it's a sign that LLN is kicking in:

111

Now, if we keep playing then we will fall into LLN's trap that has begun to pull us in with 111. So what do we do?

Well, perhaps we should switch to playing lines, numbers or something else instead of the dozen events?

No! I think there's a better way... We need to wait out LLN till it's strength begins to fade and the tides turn back to the repeat:

001 101 111 112 212 222 322 332 432

Now we can start playing again...

110 120
011 021
020
110 120
011 012
002
101 201
101 102
101 201
200
101 201
200
200
110 210
110 111 211 311
110 111 112 113
002

For the first time you have shown a different angle from the same old.

For dependent outcome it must have two unconnected points of reference.

[falkor2k15]

For the first time you have shown a different angle from the same old.

For dependent outcome it must have two unconnected points of reference.

What does that mean...?

Anyhow, so what do you think... am I on the Money now? 

[luckyfella]

Anyhow, so what do you think... am I on the Money now? 

Still far from your intended destination.

[falkor2k15]

Still far from your intended destination.

Does this get me any closer: when LLN strikes we should play opposite instead of waiting it out? 

[luckyfella]

Does this get me any closer: when LLN strikes we should play opposite instead of waiting it out? 

On the right track.
Read my posts. Reread until you get it.
They were written to indicate what don't work.
Saves you the trouble, a giveaway.
If you keep going down those dead paths you are bound to fail.

[Kav]

You are trolling each other, right?

[luckyfella]

You are trolling each other, right?

Kav, I am interested in your MM strategies, want to pick your brain.

Start a thread to discuss MM. Or post links of your MM work. Thanks

I don't have to pay you mentoring fees right ?

Trying my luck, ofc I hv to pay wtf fees.

[Kav]

ozon,
the reason these topics lead nowhere is NOT the secrecy of the "knowers".

It is because they are discussed by people who have no idea and are lost in in a labyrinth of thoughts and concept that make no sense.
Oh, and they are NOT playing the game. This is obvious. You have more real game experience (at least recently) from the main posters of this topic. These are couch players who like to play the "I know but I won't tell" game. Can't you see these people are not actually playing the game? They just enjoy a good roulette riddle and playing with "roulette problems". To me this is obvious.

Again your system is a good one. I mean it. Congrats

[luckyfella]

Can't you see these people are not actually playing the game? They just enjoy a good roulette riddle and playing with "roulette problems". To me this is obvious.

Better than losing real money playing your sure to lose MM strategies.

You have to read steve's posts about your losing MM strategies.

[Kav]

Better than losing real money playing your sure to lose MM strategies.
You have to read steve's posts about your losing MM strategies.

No, it's not better to have people who don't play the game pretending to know more than those who actually play it and experience it every other day.

Trying to create friction between me and other posters... FAILED.

[luckyfella]

Trying to create friction between me and other posters... FAILED.

It's about your 100% losing MM strategy.

Your MM strategy has not change the accuracy of your bet, not changed the odds. It's a loser.

Learnt this from steve.

What's worse is collecting money from people selling sure to lose MM strategy.

[Kav]

It is really surprizing that after all the knowledge people have amassed from your posts they are still looking for something that really works 

It's really funny that although I do not promote or hint at my strategies, people like you always bring them up! Free promotion!
And stop referring to things you have no idea about, like mathematics or my strategies. You have no clue about either.

[luckyfella]

It is really surprizing that after all the knowledge people have amassed from your posts they are still looking for something that really works 

It's really funny that although I do not promote or hint at my strategies, people like you always bring them up! Free promotion!
And stop referring to things you have no idea about, like mathematics or my strategies. You have no clue about either.

Stick to the method you sell, commercial marketer kav.

Does your method have a net positive edge ?

Yes or no ?