Theories, Myths, Facts And Ideas

[falkor2k15]

Maybe something like this?

11
2132
313
22
1231
33
212

Anyone else.....?

Here's another example of dependency that's fresh from my supercomputer this evening:

In order to avoid a deadlock on the Streets and finish CL1 to CL11 - would potentially boost us further along an open number cycle - any of the following need to be true:
Half CL1 - between 6 and 13
OR
Dozen CL1 - between 4 and 8
OR
Dozen CL2 - between 5 and 6
OR
Line CL1 - between 1 and 6
OR
Line CL2 - between 2 and 6
OR
Line CL3 - between 2 and 4

If you don't start to rack up early repeats on any of those lesser groups then it's not worth parachuting to the Street cycle - and in turn the number cycle - till closure.

Street cycle spin 12 and Number cycle spin 25 are more important than Petra and Mecca! They mark important keyframes on the only 2 guaranteed events that I know of, which we could use to exploit the game without any "edge" as we know it - thanks to the carpet layout more than anything - doesn't matter which direction you pray!

[luckyfella]

What is the math meaning behind cycles ?
Example 11
1.          2.          3
x
x

Example 121
1.          2.          3
x.          x
x

Example 1231
1.           2.          3
x.           x.          x
x

[luckyfella]

The same number of pockets remain on the wheel from one spin to the next, so why should the probability of winning change?  .......DSAA

That's a fair comment and question.

I don't have the answer.
Makes me think why.

[Steve]

Because, you know.. lines gotta cross, repeats gotta happen. Stuff like that.

[Herby]

why should the probability of winning change?

If you have a fair wheel the probability of winning doesn't change?

Saying different is misleading and should be banned !
So who was the last one to say so ? 

[Herby]

Number cycle spin 25 are more important than Petra and Mecca!

Petra and Mocca are more important than Number cycle spin 25.

Number cycle spin 26 will come in when it hurts you most.
The devil never sleeps. 

[Herby]

any of the following need to be true:
Half CL1 - between 6 and 13

Half CL1 - between 6 and 13 never can be true.

So you have a piece of program that never can be reached.

[falkor2k15]

The same number of pockets remain on the wheel from one spin to the next, so why should the probability of winning change?  .......DSAA

That's a fair comment and question.

I don't have the answer.
Makes me think why.

I think we can guarantee a win in 5 spins! I am going to run a test today/tomorrow to find out EXACTLY what conditions are needed to guarantee a repeat on the lines within 5 spins. It would mean losing a few chips for a number of cycles - or just watching - and then when the right moment comes you can bet 1000!

[falkor2k15]

Half CL1 - between 6 and 13 never can be true.

So you have a piece of program that never can be reached.

Yeah, it's actually the proceeding group (lines) that is more likely to be a trigger. I think is much higher than 5-10%, which is what Dozen CL1 conditions must satisfy to guarantee a repeat on the lines, respectively. However, I am going to delve deeper on the first 5 spins in my next test to see if we can find a trigger above 5-10%.

[Herby]

I think I see what you are trying.
If I'm right so my program about this topic half way ready, program runs but no statistics.
Arising problem: "conditional probability". (Bayes) -> probabilities don't change

[falkor2k15]

I think I see what you are trying.
If I'm right so my program about this topic half way ready, program runs but no statistics.
Arising problem: "conditional probability". (Bayes) -> probabilities don't change

It's the same reason why a number cycle closes by spin 25 and we NEVER see 36 unique numbers - now just in microcosm on the lines and streets.

[Herby]

a number cycle closes by spin 25 and we NEVER see 36 unique numbers

Probability of the first repeat of any shown number (in %)

{{1,2.7027},{2,5.25931},{3,7.46254},{4,9.14329},
{5,10.1935},{6,10.5792},{7,10.341},{8,9.58236},
{9,8.44931},{10,7.10453},{11,5.70282},{12,4.3717},
{13,3.2},{14,2.23535},{15,1.48879},{16,0.944243},
{17,0.569417},{18,0.325898},{19,0.176651},{20,0.0904612},
{21,0.0436414},{22,0.0197706},{23,0.00837944},{24,0.00330845},
{25,0.00121086},{26,0.000408421},{27,0.000126093},{28,0.0000353412},{29,8.90354×10-6},{30,1.99147×10-6},{31,3.89324×10-7},
{32,6.51701×10-8},{33,9.08199×10-9},{34,1.01159×10-9},
{35,8.44331×10-11},{36,4.69435×10-12}}

[Herby]

It's the same reason why a number cycle closes by spin 25 and we NEVER see 36 unique numbers - now just in microcosm on the lines and streets.

You might NEVER see 36 unique numbers - there is a good chance to see 12 streets.

[luckyfella]

If you have a fair wheel the probability of winning doesn't change?

Saying different is misleading and should be banned !
So who was the last one to say so ? 

This is my explanation.

Although the probability of hitting the pocket does not change but the actual spins have positive and negative variance measured against this probability.

Here is the contoversial claim I make since I returned to this forum.

I am proposing that using applied statistical techniques I can predict this variance accurately.

Read my earlier post that clearly stated that for math based systems betting method, it must be able to predict variance for the bet to increase accuracy.

I use a similar tesla369 concept to pick the specific pockets for betselection and place bets in a determined time frequency.

I am full aware this sounds outright ludicrous but yes that's what I have found. Two elements of right pockets and right timing.

Now anyone can chose to call me liar, attention seeker, personality disorder, mistake, uneducated, deluded, scammer.

I take this risk to make this post expecting the rocks thrown at me.
Carry on.

Note - for those who know me, this is where I am at now. I have to walk away to focus on my own things steeped in math. I made all these posts just for you, read them. Guys, this is the ONLY path to the solution.

[Herby]

If you have a fair wheel the probability of winning doesn't change?

Saying different is misleading and should be banned !
So who was the last one to say so ? 

This was my joking answer to the previous joking answer above from ... who was it ?