The Secret of Tesla's 3 6 9

[icebaby]

4,13,22,31

4 -group 3
13 -group 6
22--group 9
31--group 3

you have to use top group number not bottom.when root number street hit

what i meant if it comes 5,24 instead of 4 and 22 bet will be same

[ludo8400]

@ icebaby

In my excel file I use TESLA groupes

groupe 3 = 2,3,4
groupe 6 = 5;6;7
groupe 9 = 1,8,9

groupe 3 I play 2,3,4, 11,12,13,20;21;22

etc. for the other groupes


ludo8400

[icebaby]

can you help me to make one excel for me for my method

[ludo8400]

can you help me to make one excel for me for my method

I will do it
Ludo8400

[ludo8400]

@ ICEBAY

your excel file methode one


ludo8400

[luckyfella2]

Earlier tesla369 invited me to his now paid skype group, I declined.

There's is this weird fetish that people believe in some nice sounding scientific related groupings that somehow will give them advantage in their betting.

NO it will not !

The only way to place bets with a positive edge is through the use of real MATH.

I post below a few sessions played on rsim as demonstration that when you place bets at the right place and time with real MATH the outcome will ALWAYS be MATH based 100% of the time.

+32
+20+
+8
+28
+16

That graph is a sample of the rest of the games.

I can continue to do these sessions all day long.
(You will only get to see this post and the pic if steve approves, or I select some member to post on my behalf)

***I challenged steve to produce a similar result on rsim. We all know he can't. He responded to moderate my account.

For those who still doubt, as I claimed earlier I can produce these results based on calculated math over and over again.

[6th-sense]

ludo..are your calculations right on method one..you have plus 2 minus 2? its betting 8 streets a time? or am i missing something

[ludo8400]

@ 6th-sense

Yes you were right
It is minus 2 and PLUS 1
I made a correction in second file
ludo8400

[Steve]

Ok Lucky, maybe I'll teach you something.

First, specify what your account on RS is. You've only shown trash like anonymous accounts with $3016 bankroll, when the starting bankroll is $3000. I mean, really???

My purpose is to point out that you are completely wrong that MATH cannot be used to design a winning bet. I have done that as shown on my rsim rated games result. I can produce this same result again and again.

Ok, so tell everyone your RS username and make it public, so everyone can see. Why hide it if you're proving you're great?

Specify the account you've been showing us. I'll check the entire account history matches with what you've shown so far - to verify you aren't using duplicate accounts. It shouldn't be a problem, right?

Your MATH knowledge is basic statistics.

Actually, I know a bit more. What I need to explain is just really simple math, which you still don't understand. I dare not explain anything like Calculus or Trigonometry. I'm no math expert though. I'm closer to a physicist. You dont need to be an expert in anything to understand basic principles.

I have no personal vendetta against you

Strange, coming from someone who recently declared this:

I am here with the sole purpose to point out all the false rubbish you post on forums to mislead other people with your own lack of knowledge. That's my ONLY purpose.

Why don't you just go win real money, instead of using multiple RS accounts winning fake money, to prove everyone how stupid I am?

you are nobody

That hurts.

But if success in roulette is your measure of one's worth, and I've made multiple millions with automated image recognition computers that allow me to win at home in pijamas, and you're still messing around with fake money and +$16 profits, then what does it make you?

You advice is misleading based on limited knowledge.

My statements about what is and isn't possible coincide with what every other gaming professional, statistician, mathematician etc all say. Do you mean to say we're all wrong? And I thought all them highly qualified people, especially mathematicians and statisticians learned something at school.

Lucky, you dont understand really basic math.  In the countless tests done by many people, including myself, repeaters have shown to have absolutely zero value. But hey, you claim to be the genius who found the way. You won $16 fake money on an online game. You even did it a few times. Good on you. Nobel prize coming up.

I'm here to tell the world that MATH alone can be used as a form of advantage play. So yes I am an advantage player - AP. Telling the world about the possibility of math based advantage play is not trolling.

APs attack the mechanism that determines game outcomes, ie the wheel. Past winning numbers offer clues to future winning numbers, but they do not at all INFLUENCE future numbers. Using repeaters is using irrelevant past data in attempt to predict future spins. There is no correlation between past and future spins like this. It's like saying you had reds like RRRRRR and thinking B is "due". I know you don't understand it. I don't care.

So, let's look at this challenge you're making. Start by identifying the RS account you're using to make a fool of me.

You're heading in deeper with this obsession with me. I don't think it'll end well for you. But if you want to push it, ok.

[luckyfella2]

Ok Lucky, maybe I'll teach you something.

First, specify what your account on RS is. You've only shown trash like anonymous accounts with $3016 bankroll, when the starting bankroll is $3000. I mean, really???

I repeat, the bankroll required is not 3000units. 3000units is automatically given by rsim, I don't need 3000units br.

Ok, so tell everyone your RS username and make it public, so everyone can see. Why hide it if you're proving you're great?

What will revealing my username achieve ? As long as I chose to set it to private the owners of rsim will check my rated games, they're the only ones who benefit. Anyway, some veteran members of this forum know my account name.

***I have deleted this account. I won't need rsim anymore.

Specify the account you've been showing us. I'll check the entire account history matches with what you've shown so far - to verify you aren't using duplicate accounts. It shouldn't be a problem, right?

Your attempt to cast aspersion that this is a duplicate account won't work. I just keep adding to the list of results previously posted.

Actually, I know a bit more. What I need to explain is just really simple math, which you still don't understand. I dare not explain anything like Calculus or Trigonometry. I'm no math expert though. I'm closer to a physicist. You dont need to be an expert in anything to understand basic principles.

Strange, coming from someone who recently declared this:

Why don't you just go win real money, instead of using multiple RS accounts winning fake money, to prove everyone how stupid I am?

That hurts.

But if success in roulette is your measure of one's worth, and I've made multiple millions with automated image recognition computers that allow me to win at home while sitting at home in pijamas, and you're still messing around with fake money and +$16 profits, then what does it make you?

Sorry, I don't believe your claim.

My statements about what is and isn't possible coincide with what every other gaming professional, statistician, mathematician etc all say. Do you mean to say we're all wrong. And I thought all them highly qualified people, especially mathematicians and statisticians learned something at school.

Lucky, you dont understand really basic math.  In the countless tests done by many people, including myself, repeaters has shown to have absolutely zero value. But hey, you claim to be the genius that found the way. You won $16 fake money on an online game. You even did it a few times. Good on you. Nobel price coming up.

APs attack the mechanism that determines game outcomes, ie the wheel. Past winning numbers offer clues to future winning numbers, but they do not at all INFLUENCE future numbers. Using repeaters is using irrelevant past data in attempt to predict future spins. There is no correlation between past and future spins like this. It's like saying you had reds like RRRRRR and thinking B is "due". I know you don't understand it. I don't care.

Your knowledge is basic statistics. Stop your silly teaching to a true expert. 

So, let's look at this challenge you're making. Start by identifying the RS account you're using to make a fool of me.

Your attempt to provoke me to reveal the math will not work.

You're heading in deeper with this obsession with me. I don't think it'll end well for you. But if you want to push it, ok.

This latest result shows controlled losses based on math. I already posted the details of the expected value in my earlier post. Long term results must converge to this expected value. That's real math based betting.

link:s://:.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=26361.msg232923#msg232923

My message is plain and simple.

We can build math based mechanical systems bet that is a form of advantage play which gives a net positive edge.

I'm done posting charts and everything I wanted to convey I have posted. Just read my posts.

Steve, you took my posts too personal as though they were directed at you. No they're not. Yes I used your forum to convey this message of math based advantage play.

Back to making real money. Signing out from online for the last time - 7 Nov 2019

[Steve]

I already posted the details of the expected value in my earlier post

Oh you said you have a massive edge. That must mean it's true.
Thanks for clearing it up.

What will revealing my username achieve ?

It will determine if you're constantly resetting your bankroll back to $3000, which seems to be the case anyway. Because all you've shown is bankrolls like $3016. I mean you say your system works. So where is the massive bankroll you keep building?

I have deleted this account. I won't need rsim anymore.

Riiiight.

Sorry, I don't believe your claim.

...and that makes me smile.

Your knowledge is basic statistics. Stop your silly teaching to a true expert.

Lucky, you've revealed yourself as a poser with nothing. Anyone who was paying attention knows this now. People dont need to be experts to see that.

Your attempt to provoke me to reveal the math will not work.

I dont give a shit about your fantasy math. Why? Because we're not even at the stage where anything you've shown is remotely credible. I mean a few $16 wins with fake money? Seriously.

Then you challenge me, bait me expecting it would go well for you, I move towards taking your challenge, you shit yourself, backpeddle, and fall on your face.

My message is plain and simple.
We can build math based mechanical systems bet that is a form of advantage play which gives a net positive edge.
I'm done posting charts and everything I wanted to convey I have posted. Just read my posts.
Steve, you took my posts too personal as though they were directed at you. No they're not. Yes I used your forum to convey this message of math based advantage play. Back to making real money. Signing out from online for the last time - 7 Nov 2019

Blah, blah, blah. It's nothing of substance. You just backed out of your own challenge.

And why? Because you've got nothing - except a screenshot of a few +$16 wins of fake money.

You hide your RS account name probably because you know we'll see the many bankroll resets. When you see where it's headed, you abruptly declare you deleted the account. Who here was born yesterday?

Seriously Lucky, I hoped you'd put up at least a semi-interesting challenge. Instead you fell flat on your face.

Next time when you challenge someone, ... look, maybe just don't challenge anyone again. You're no good at it.

Back to making real money. Signing out from online for the last time - 7 Nov 2019

Translation: I embarrassed myself. I better leave.

I'm sorry Lucky, you've made a dick of yourself and wasted enough of my time.

[Steve]

Keep in mind Lucky, if you're going to be a dick or push me, you'll get it right back. I ignored you for a while, but you persisted in attacking me personally - even declaring your sole reason for being here is showing everyone how uneducated and inexperienced i am. When I responded, you made a fool of yourself. I'm not wasting more time on you.

[Clf7]

Steve did you ever hear abou a italian women named Roberta Cottone? A math genie or so, who claims that he can "crack"lotto and roulette.Her Blog is in italian and is very old, on the web i cant find a thing about this Person, only a weird youtube channel.

Here is the link from her Forum---> link:://robertcotton258.blogspot.com/

[Irish88]

Some very interesting stuff in this thread incorporating the ideas of 3,6,9. Maybe it can be useful.


link:s://:.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=11302.0

[Pave]

Roberta Cottone some kind of Formula Roulette and Lottery Games

link:://robertcotton258.blogspot.com/2007/06/codici-fissi-di-tempo-per-cadenza-per_08.html
ONLY WHO KNOWS THE NUMBERS CAN WIN
THIS SCHEME FROM ME CREATED FOR THE LOT AND ROULETTE GAME GUARANTEES THE LUCK TO THOSE WHO

CAN INTERPRET THEM THE TIME CODES ARE FUNDAMENTAL, INDICATE THE NUMBER OUTPUT AND THE CADENCE AND THE TIME SET IN THE CODE and the other way around