What is THE BEST system? With real money!

[RayManZ]

I have been playing two systems with a lot of success.

Gizmotrons reading randomness
psychic roulette preditions

both take a lot of time and work to learn, but they work.

I think the same can be said for AP. It also takes alot of work to learn.

Conclusion? Nothing is simple and you have to work for it to get some results. Just like all good things in life.

[Steve]

I just wanted you to know that I was not trying to insult you with the temperature comment. It has nothing to do with prediction

You didnt know temperature actually does affect spin outcomes. Why would that insult me?

What I was trying to say is that the shoes that you wear can't tell the future.

Well if you wear clown shoes and try dancing next to a cliff, there's a high probability of falling.

For the sake of a six year old I will try one last time with a Turboesque euphemistic axiom.

Some of those words are too big for 6 year olds.

You can't bet on a thing to continue if it is not already continuing first.

the next bet is selected because it is in a state of continuance and not because of an ability to predict that it will happen my way.

If something is in a state of continuance, it is continuing to happen into the future - derived from the word "continue". Otherwise you are looking at the past.

Here's what you're saying: You are not predicting the future. You are looking at the past to predict the future.

[Steve]

It's best we leave it. I'm sure you'll agree. Again if you are winning, keep winning.

[gizmotron2]

1.) If something is in a state of continuance, it is continuing to happen into the future - derived from the word "continue". Otherwise you are looking at the past.

2.) Here's what you're saying: You are not predicting the future. You are looking at the past to predict the future.

Let's look at that and see if it is true or not. If I see 10 reds in a row then I can say that these past spins have been in a state of continuing. I'm not saying what will happen next. The future is in fact unknown. To me that alone contradicts both of these opinions. But let's take on the second one. I'm looking at the past to check the now conditions. Even though the odds have not changed for an individual spin I'm guessing that the next spin result might confirm that I'm in a win streak. I'm looking for win streaks and slow grind upwards moments. I don't get killed in a session if I encounter changes, even if I go into a swarm of them and lose a single session. The odds do not produce perfect losing streaks all the time. The future is only data that confirms what type of streak I'm in. It does not have control over me like it does people that can't see what I see. I have taught people to see this. I have just failed with you.

[gizmotron2]

Reading Randomness is about checking the condition of now. I want to know what is happening right now. I base my next bet on what is happening right now. I have no magic wand to see the future and know it. I want to know if the win streaks are solid or fragmented. It's so easy that a 5 year old can see that. When my guessing is working I'm in a win streak. When my guessing is hitting hit or miss then I'm not in a win streak. When my guessing is not hitting at all I'm in a losing streak. I can see this. It's real information that I can use to adjust bet sizes. I chose to use the appearance of a thing continuing in order to make bet selections. That way I can see when the guesses are in sync with the win streaks. It is a way of confirming past results. I'm confirming past bet selections to win/loss conditions. It's all in the past. The past tells me what win/loss state I'm now in. I just happen to know that winning conditions swarm if you are smart enough to look for them. Trends or patterns swarm too. I can tie a trend to a win streak. So I do. I'm in control of that. It does not concern me that people need to see the future in order to win disagreements. I can't see the future but I can still disintegrate known probability expectations.  It's for you math oriented people to explain it. Now is the time to keep heads down in the sand. What is coming can't be stopped. Too many people are looking at this. It's just a matter of time. I don't care who can't see this.

Now we can drop it.

[Bebediktus3]

I have been playing two systems with a lot of success.

Can you that somehow demonstrate, not only say chart from RX  . For example, to play against some order of numbers from mine wheel, you will see all and after every spin, you simply say what you bet in next, very easy...

I tested many systems and positive result show only one, which I himself created. Long-time ago that was, but I am not paid much attention to that, as all AP I think that somewhere is a mistake in algorithm.
Now again started to do some tests trying to find that mistake, but I can't

So sometimes strange things happend also for AP ....

[Steve]

If I see 10 reds in a row then I can say that these past spins have been in a state of continuing.

Are those spins in the past?
Yes = they are past.
Yes + (random future) = (your bet selection changes nothing)

Why use the word continuing if it's the past?

I get what you are saying. The problem is you're incorrect.

Even though the odds have not changed for an individual spin I'm guessing that the next spin result might confirm that I'm in a win streak.

Here you are correlating random past to random future. Only future odds count. You cant bet on the past.

I have taught people to see this. I have just failed with you.

You failed with me because I understand.

I base my next bet on what is happening right now.

And your "now" is based on past spins, which have no correlation to future spins. So why look at the past at all if you know spins are random?

Reading Randomness is about checking the condition of now

Random means random. Reading randomness is not possible because it's random. You like swimming but hate water.

Round and round. Unfortunately you're lost in fallacy land still.

What is coming can't be stopped. Too many people are looking at this. It's just a matter of time. I don't care who can't see this.

If gamblers had a nickel for every time they thought they had something but didn't, they could retire wealthy. I've been there before. We all have. The way to know if you are right or wrong is see if you have ALREADY won a fortune or not.

[gizmotron2]

I don't care. I'll read it later, someday. I'm done trying. I does not matter. People that try it out will decide.

[slopez007]

I know that it's works.
Other people know that it's works.
Don't worry.
Everyone is free to learn and practice by himself...

[gizmotron2]

There is a reason that I gave up on double dozens, 24 - 26 numbers. I really haven't gone into it much. All I have said is that it digs deep holes real fast. If you can't beat the casino flat betting then there is no money management method other than virtual bets to deal with it. Reading Randomness is about flat betting using virtual bets and waiting for win streaks that are a slow grind upward or of the super win streak type. These things occur by coincidence and only require a skilled observer to execute their exploitation. A prerequisite skill to tell the future is not required. Most of the time a condition will last at least once more once it is discovered. Very seldom do trends and patterns of winning end just when you notice them like in a swarm of losses. They win more than they lose when they are in a winning state or condition. They lose in a slow grind or a steep dive when they lose. The only skill needed is the skill to see what type of condition the session is in. Everyone talks about Money Management. This is all about Session Management. You use it to deliberately win the session. This leaves behind wishful thinking and probability expectations that have no control over recent variance. You just let variance have its way and change as it changes.

[gizmotron2]

Here's what you're saying: You are not predicting the future. You are looking at the past to predict the future.

I'm looking at the past to see what the conditions are for the session. The big changes don't act that fast. I play to win on the big changes.

But let's play your head trip game. Yes, I can predict the future. So can you if you learn what I have taught. I predict that a win streak will eventually occur. I'm 100% sure that it will occur. I will virtual bet in my charts until it occurs. I will get my three net wins and quit during that occurrence. I predict that you can do the same if you give up your "annoying" quest to prove that prediction is a skill that can't exist. Where is your proof that prediction can't work? I know that you are wrong. Now prove that prediction can't work.

[gizmotron2]

Here is proof that a win streak can occur. It starts out as a win streak, goes into a losing streak and comes back to a win streak. This is 100 spins all bet on red with no virtual bets.

[gizmotron2]

I predict that you can't prove that prediction does not work. Therefore all your logic so far is wrong. I predict that this will annoy you. I also predict that I will try to win every one of my sessions. I know that all I have to do is wait for a win streak. I love coincidence and variance. Thankfully the math police can't enforce a law that does not exist for it. Probability can't tell you when a win streak will occur, how long it will last, and when it will end. Probability is as good as prediction.

Let's drop it now.

[Tinsoldiers]

Is there race going for who is having the last word . There seem to be discussions about dropping, waiting for it to drop though.   

[gizmotron2]

Is there race going for who is having the last word . There seem to be discussions about dropping, waiting for it to drop though.   

So drop it. I have.

P.S. I predicted this.