Repeaters roulette systems

[luckyfella]

You're making the classic mistake explained at link:s://:.roulettephysics.com/can-repeaters-systems-win-at-roulette/

It's not something to argue about. The proof is really clear.

100% certain no mistakes on my part.
Won't waste time argue with you.

100% certain repeaters hit in my roulette lifetime when I place my bets at the rate shown below.

How I know I win 100% with math designed repeaters systems bet ?

This are the facts of my repeaters systems bet,

1. Flatbet,
2. 50:50 even chance payout,
3. Longterm hiitrate - 70%,
4. Max drawdown - 30%

With this real stats I have no chance to lose.
With math based repeaters designed systems bet, I don't try to predict the next spin, I simply can't do that. The repeaters hit because math dictates where and when the repeaters pockets hit.

***You can posts whatever name-calling below till your face turn blue, it won't change a thing. You can't change math.

[Kav]

Joe, with statistics you can never 100% prove something. Simply the more data you have, the more assured you are.

Even if you test over 100,000 spins with the same system, sometimes the player will profit - especially when the system uses triggers, and ends up betting only on 10,000 spins. And especially with progression, where perhaps 1000 of those spins are high bets, and 9,000 are low bets. In such a case, there would only be 1,000 significant bets - which is still short term.

Agreed!
There is no easy way to evaluate roulette methods. Or at least there is no easy way to evaluate really good roulette methods - some garbage is obvious.

[Steve]

I'm not sure what you're referring to. Even random bets can profit. It doesn't mean the system is a "winning" one (in the context "winning system" and "losing system" are used).

[Steve]

You can posts whatever name-calling below till your face turn blue, it won't change a thing. You can't change math.

The math is like I said. You just aren't understanding it. Repeaters change nothing. You don't change accuracy. Your payout is always lower than the odds.

But if I'm wrong, why be here? Just make your fortune. You have the HG. Or is your system not yet perfected? You will have it figured out soon though.

[luckyfella]

Even random bets can profit. It doesn't mean the system is a "winning" one (in the context "winning system" and "losing system" are used).

This is plain nonsense with the intention to cast doubt.

I challenge you, steve, to play with 10units bankroll with the following conditions -
1. Flatbet 1unit,
2. Hitrate -70%,
3. Max drawdown - 30%,
4. Target bankroll - 100units

Prove that you can do this.
You can try a million times and cherry pick to post only the successful attempt. Now go ahead prove it.
If you can't provide the proof I reserve the right to tell you to fark off.

[Steve]

I challenge you, steve, to play with 10units bankroll with the following conditions -
1. Flatbet 1unit,
2. Hitrate -70%,
3. Max drawdown - 30%,
4. Target bankroll - 100units

You are talking such low volume its not worth anyone's time. Just go make money. Make a fool of every professional in this industry.

[luckyfella]

But if I'm wrong, why be here? Just make your fortune. You have the HG. Or is your system not yet perfected? You will have it figured out soon though.

I am here with the sole purpose to point out all the false rubbish you post on forums to mislead other people with your own lack of knowledge. That's my ONLY purpose.

[luckyfella]

You are talking such low volume its not worth anyone's time. Just go make money. Make a fool of every professional in this industry.

So, when posed a real challenge to provide proof, you simply run away.

Now, fark off. Don't waste everybodys time.

Anyone else have anything to say, provide proof of my challenge to back up your post.

SHOW ME THE MONEY !

Else,

FARK OFF

[luckyfella]

I am very happy that some people have reported they finally see what I have tried to show them with my posts here. This makes me happier than my regular winning sessions.

This is only the beginning on what's possible with math based repeaters systems bet. Read every of my posts on this thread, especially the final key to the complete solution. I have taken special care to be specific and explicit with my choice of words and the selected pics presented in the manner as they were.

[luckyfella]

We are waiting all of you..

Tesla369 is a unique way to regroup numbers. Compare this tesla369 groups to the regular carpet dozen to see the difference. Math based repeaters systems bet can be played with tesla369 groups to yield similar results.

Personally, I recommend to try out tesla369 groups for starters, understand the underlying math then you can expand to all other permutations.

[Steve]

I am here with the sole purpose to point out all the false rubbish you post on forums to mislead other people with your own lack of knowledge

Tell me your #1 thing that demonstrates my lack of knowledge. Be VERY specific. Show me where I was wrong (in my own posts), and the proof I'm wrong. Give it your best shot.

Dont back down now. Remember, you've now revealed your sole purpose is to show everyone I'm full of shit. So do it.

So, when posed a real challenge to provide proof, you simply run away.

A real challenge? No. You said 10 units start, target bankroll 100 units? So you challenge me to bet 3 units on one number, for 3 spins. I'll achieve the 100 unit profit 1 in 12 tests. Wow, big challenge. Like I said, it's so short term it isnt worth any attention.

I have taken special care to be specific and explicit with my choice of words and the selected pics presented in the manner as they were.

No you havent. You even fell over yourself with the contradiction Kav highlighted. You say many other stupid things, but who has time to keep track?

[luckyfella]

A real challenge? No. You said 10 units start, target bankroll 100 units? So you challenge me to bet 3 units on one number, for 3 spins. I'll achieve the 100 unit profit 1 in 12 tests. Wow, big challenge. Like I said, it's so short term it isnt worth any attention.

Show us the proof steve.
Everyone is waiting which we already know you can't do it.

You don't deserve further response.
Now, fark off.

[Steve]

Proof of what exactly?
Be very specific.

If you mean betting 1 number 3 times will average a win 3/37? You need more proof?

[Andre Chass]

You just can't beat roulette.

The wheel doesn't give a crap on past spins.

Repeaters, uniques, non hits, trends, patterns, etc, are only in your f**"* heads.

Stop wasting you time, money and even your mental health.

If you're looking for some chance to win some money, try playing baccarat.

I've seen people destroying their lives obsessed on roulette systems.

[Elite]

I am very happy that some people have reported they finally see what I have tried to show them with my posts here. This makes me happier than my regular winning sessions.

This is only the beginning on what's possible with math based repeaters systems bet. Read every of my posts on this thread, especially the final key to the complete solution. I have taken special care to be specific and explicit with my choice of words and the selected pics presented in the manner as they were.

Thanks Luckyfilla, you gave new insight  , i will do test on your ideas